Daitru wrote:It does not punish those who commit fraud. It punishes those who sell gems not evaluated by an IGA-accredited lab. If it made non-IGA-accredited lab-tested gems sold under the pretence of a gem evaluated by an IGA-accredited lab illegal, then it would be preventing fraud. As it is, the proposal simply squelches economic freedom.
Indeed we begin to wonder what could possibly motivate your Excellency's position on this statute. In what way does Daitru benefit from allowing massive international criminal organisations to reap ever increasing profits from a massive black market gem trade? What does your Excellency's government stand to gain from allowing poor miners, gem processors and a host of other workers in various branches of this trade, amounting to some billions of persons, to have their pockets picked by the most disgusting of criminal cartels and syndicates?
We are quite frankly appalled at what may be the answers to these questions.
Yours,


Urgench should be very proud of this resolution and Charlotte Ryberg will be eager to enter the Gem trading market with confidence.