Advertisement
by Southern Republic of Dixie » Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:21 pm
LGBTQ+ Rights Anti-Ethno Supremacy Anti-Slavery Anti-Fascist Anti-Communist Pro-IndependenceMy Nation Facts.
by Southern Republic of Dixie » Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:23 pm
Caelapes wrote:i am frankly SHOCKED at all of the people with confederate and gadsen flags coming out of the woodwork to support this garbage proposal
LGBTQ+ Rights Anti-Ethno Supremacy Anti-Slavery Anti-Fascist Anti-Communist Pro-IndependenceMy Nation Facts.
by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:16 pm
by Ransium » Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:42 pm
by Maowi » Wed Feb 20, 2019 2:13 pm
Ransium wrote:Please don’t triple post in the future, it’s a form of spam. In the future, if you want to add more content you can edit the last post you’ve made. You can also quote several different people in a single post. Thanks.
by Ransium » Wed Feb 20, 2019 2:15 pm
by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 20, 2019 2:37 pm
Ransium wrote:Please don’t triple post in the future, it’s a form of spam. In the future, if you want to add more content you can edit the last post you’ve made. You can also quote several different people in a single post. Thanks.
by Ransium » Wed Feb 20, 2019 3:08 pm
by The Reddington States » Wed Feb 20, 2019 3:22 pm
by North Saitama » Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:01 pm
Rat Piss wrote:North Saitama wrote:
1. Yes, it is that simple; doing something, anything, is disproportionate, as mere advocacy is, on its own, physically harmless and abstract, while actions are concrete and have a physical effect. Kicking-over a fascist's sand castle is, therefore, unjust, as you retaliated against their abhorrent-but-abstract ideas with concrete physical action.
2. It doesn't mean, however, that physical action is acceptable or just. Refusing to hire a neo-Nazi is different from punching a neo-Nazi; in the former case, it is refusing to interact with him (non-action), while, in the latter case, it is physically harming him (action).
In case the message isn't clear, the point is that the words don't matter; saying "exterminate <insert group>", on its own, physically harms exactly zero members of said group. Until the threshold of action is passed, there is no justification for doing harm.
Anyone who can't understand that there are both physical and nonphysical forms of violence must not have had creative enough bullies in middle school.
by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:21 pm
The Reddington States wrote:You know, if you were looking for evidence to support your proposal, then I don't understand why you didn't come to me since Northern Redlands is the epitome of a non-fascist region invaded over allegations of fascism. I mean, seriously, they used a politically incorrect joke (that was made as a result of Nazi accusations) as a means to raid. Given that this proposal is going to fail miserably, you may want to search for evidence in the community backing up your proposal since everyone who voted no can't see a single downside of NS Antifa. Asking me would be a good place to start.
by Rat Piss » Wed Feb 20, 2019 5:34 pm
North Saitama wrote:Which also leads to my dismay with Antifa playing judge, jury, and executioner. Antifa has taken it upon themselves to enforce their own international laws, and trample on with jackboots whatever regions they deem "fascist", with many regions' crimes being simply being right-wing, as shown. Then, not only are they not condemned, but they are actually applauded, for being interventionist jackboots, because "duh notzeez".
by North Saitama » Wed Feb 20, 2019 5:56 pm
Rat Piss wrote:North Saitama wrote:Which also leads to my dismay with Antifa playing judge, jury, and executioner. Antifa has taken it upon themselves to enforce their own international laws, and trample on with jackboots whatever regions they deem "fascist", with many regions' crimes being simply being right-wing, as shown. Then, not only are they not condemned, but they are actually applauded, for being interventionist jackboots, because "duh notzeez".
Its a job somebody should be doing, and unless you are recommending we come together and form some sort of committee to discuss which nations are endorsing nazism, then I'm glad Antifa is taking care of it for us. What alternatives are you suggesting? If it's that we let bygones be bygones, then, well, sorry, but no matter what you're opinion on the matter is, that's not going to happen. Fascisms own repugnant nature will always be instigating this kind of blow back.
You may not like Antifa acting as judge jury and executioner, but but in this context? Those are necessary roles.
by Wrapper » Wed Feb 20, 2019 7:00 pm
The Communist Union of B wrote:I agree with this. Antifa spreads propaganda and invades regions under the guise of “we’re removing fascism and making the world better” when all they’re doing is destabilizing peaceful right wing regions and doing more damage then the alt-right they try to fight and leaving them an empty husk. It’s time to end them once and far all.
by North Saitama » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:15 pm
Wrapper wrote:The Communist Union of B wrote:I agree with this. Antifa spreads propaganda and invades regions under the guise of “we’re removing fascism and making the world better” when all they’re doing is destabilizing peaceful right wing regions and doing more damage then the alt-right they try to fight and leaving them an empty husk. It’s time to end them once and far all.
Perhaps the answer, instead of taking it to the Security Council — many members of whom view condemnations as a desirable badge of honor (ahem) — maybe you should get like-minded GPers together and create an army to counteract Antifa.
by Impaled Nazarene » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:19 pm
Wrapper wrote:The Communist Union of B wrote:I agree with this. Antifa spreads propaganda and invades regions under the guise of “we’re removing fascism and making the world better” when all they’re doing is destabilizing peaceful right wing regions and doing more damage then the alt-right they try to fight and leaving them an empty husk. It’s time to end them once and far all.
Perhaps the answer, instead of taking it to the Security Council — many members of whom view condemnations as a desirable badge of honor (ahem) — maybe you should get like-minded GPers together and create an army to counteract Antifa.
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."
by Ceolophysia » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:31 pm
Chancellor Van Der Spul implies that people are "Isekai'd" when they die, rather than going to an afterlife.A Level 12 civilization, according to this index.
by Impaled Nazarene » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:39 pm
Ceolophysia wrote:Impaled Nazarene wrote:Because being Anti Anti-Fascist is literally pro-fascism.
It's being against a movement that just happens to be called "Antifa." Despite their name, they do not own the concept of opposition to fascism, and a person is not automatically part of this movement because of their opposition to fascism. A person who opposes this specific movement is also not necessarily a member of the group they are intended to fight, simply due to the fact that they are against it.
Please stop making arguments based on the literal definition of the name "Antifa." You don't prove a point. It's just like calling National Socialism left-wing because it has the word "socialism" in it. National socialism isn't left-wing, and Anti-Antifa isn't Anti-Anti-Fascism.
(And yes, I am voting against this condemnation.)
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."
by Ceolophysia » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:41 pm
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Ceolophysia wrote:It's being against a movement that just happens to be called "Antifa." Despite their name, they do not own the concept of opposition to fascism, and a person is not automatically part of this movement because of their opposition to fascism. A person who opposes this specific movement is also not necessarily a member of the group they are intended to fight, simply due to the fact that they are against it.
Please stop making arguments based on the literal definition of the name "Antifa." You don't prove a point. It's just like calling National Socialism left-wing because it has the word "socialism" in it. National socialism isn't left-wing, and Anti-Antifa isn't Anti-Anti-Fascism.
(And yes, I am voting against this condemnation.)
Screams in poor english
Chancellor Van Der Spul implies that people are "Isekai'd" when they die, rather than going to an afterlife.A Level 12 civilization, according to this index.
by North Saitama » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:50 pm
North Saitama wrote:Then that will just be condemned or portrayed as fascist.
by Impaled Nazarene » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:58 pm
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."
by North Saitama » Wed Feb 20, 2019 9:08 pm
by Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 20, 2019 9:12 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement