Holy Pointless Complications, Batman! This seriously feels like a solution in search of a problem that literally doesn't exist. Correct. Nothing I've seen here has any chance of being implemented. Even more complicated: Implement the ability to create sub-nations within a nation, which are each tre...

Riemstagrad wrote:Changing names = chaos. For humans, like most players, a unique nation name is the best way to identify and recognize other players.

Agreed. Nation names are basically usernames here. Unless the two could be separated, recycling names is a bad idea.

Congratulations on learning today that tone does not convey well via text! Hmm. :blink: I always thought it did... Maybe thats why that girl broke up with me... :rofl: She got a call that day she couldn't refuse. https://pm1.narvii.com/6831/444fb231cdfa8280a5cb88035ed7444eaf5ce185v2_00.jpg *phone v...

See no. Then you have those nations that never do cards. I say take the top 250 or 500 for cards and enter them into a raffle. Pull 15 or so and bam! you got your Mythic's. And besides, one more rank wont hurt anything. I am sure we could live without Ultra-Rare, yet we have it anyway. This is for ...

DavanteAdams wrote:

Obuba wrote:
If that's true, send me yours please. I'm sure you could live without them just fine.

I need them for my USA collection.

DavanteAdams wrote:I am sure we could live without Ultra-Rare, yet we have it anyway.

Hmm.

What I consider probably the only real solution is to make approvals permanent, or at least only removable by the person who gave the approval. Anyone who was delegate at the time the proposal went live can give their approval. We don’t need to fix something that isn’t broken. This. The system work...

So we’re looking at Koem Kab, The Northern Light, 9003, and Giovanniland all getting there cards to mythic rarity throughout seasons? I think it’d be cool if you just picked 10-20 random nations and suddenly their card had value. I am sure we could live without Ultra-Rare, yet we have it anyway. If...

DavanteAdams wrote:

Obuba wrote:
Quite right. I'm glad you can recognize my wisdom.

There's one.
But many others have been here way longer than you and we want change.

"You're new here, therefore your opinion is invalid."

Why does OP want to bog the card market? This will significantly reduce the value of Legendary cards. The whole point of these cards is that they're the top. You, at 5 days old, already have a better understanding of the cards economy than everyone in this thread advocating for an additional rarity...

Why does OP want to bog the card market? This will significantly reduce the value of Legendary cards. The whole point of these cards is that they're the top.

How you interpret statistics is generally up to you. Some stat descriptions are measured in the literal sense - while others are more vague. In general, they all imply a certain thing (in the case of Primitiveness, that the extent to which locals accredit natural phenomena to some sort of animalist...

Questions and discussions about statistics and what they mean and how they are decided by issues outcomes go in the Got Issues? forum . I'll make a request for this thread to be moved there so that some Issue Editors (and other people knowledgeable in stat meanings) can see your question and hopefu...

I am finding it difficult figuring out what some statistics mean... For example: Primitiveness; Scary Big Number Scale; Nations were ranked by World Census officials based on the number of natural phenomena attributed to the unknowable will of animal-based spirit gods. This is currently, as of the t...