NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Condemn Great Nepal

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

[PASSED] Condemn Great Nepal

Postby Denecaep » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:12 pm

This is now up to vote!

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING Great Nepal as an oppressive dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population, along with subjecting citizens to cruel punishment.

INSULTED by the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in the slave trade while it was still a member of the World Assembly.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.
c. Using child slaves for labor purposes.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to other nations through actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Threatening to use and has actively used these cheap nuclear weapons on both WA and non-WA nations alike.
c. Creating and purchasing viruses and biological weapons.
d. Using newly founded nations as testing sites for nuclear weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal




So how is it? I did my research by going through Great Nepal's posts. Would anyone here support it?
Last edited by Kryozerkia on Sat May 08, 2010 3:58 am, edited 10 times in total.
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Denecaep » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:13 pm

Oh, and if anyone has anything to add, please say so!
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:02 am

Anyone... critique or anything?

Maybe at least a poll vote?
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:29 am

Righto, let's have a go.

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.

INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.

UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal


There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.
Last edited by South Norwega on Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
Of the Quendi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15447
Founded: Mar 18, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Of the Quendi » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:34 am

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?


Precisely. Great Nepal is no worse than so many other nations and i doubt that this can go through.
Nation RP name
Arda i Eruhíni (short form)
Alcarinqua ar Meneldëa Arda i Eruhíni i sé Amanaranyë ar Aramanaranyë (long form)

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 am

Oh my!!!!! :o :o :o

I have seen this post, and have hereby decided to cancel fights with Great Nepal International Airport. After seeing this thread though, I will have to check Great Nepal's posts first for prove. Full detail will come later.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:57 am

This quote is from this site.
Great Nepal wrote:We want 8000 slaves to work in our wepons factorys, we dont care about there race, sex etc. But we want them to be a child, and slim. More details are in the following form.

Name of State: Great Nepal
Head of Slave or Trade department (if applicable): N/A
Sex slaves (Y or N): No
Age group of slaves: Child
Characteristics: We dont care about this (just send which is cheapest)
Body condition: Slim
Special requests: Please send slaves who are able to work long and hard.

This quote is from this site.
Great Nepal wrote:To: Orlkjestad
From: Great Nepal

We are shocked to hear your message. You say you believe in freedom but oppose people who believes in slave trade? You may not like slave trade, we have nothing to say in it but we believe in slave trade so we have our right to practice it. And there is also a question of Free market. Every nation have its own views so we urge not to interference in the personal matter of a nation, it is considered immoral. And about declaring a war, we dont think this is a good reason to declare a war.

-Dictator Of Great Nepal.


So far, I have only found evidence for slavery. But as a nation, my people find it shocking that another country can blatantly get slaves. And the slaves in the slave market are children who won't have an education thanks to this event.
Technically, I half agree with Great Nepal in the other post. But the other half is that slave nations sometimes just take them away. Those are real slaves. They are forced directly.

More eveidence will come soon.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 592
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:07 am

South Norwega wrote:There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.

Vargas listened and nodded in agreement with the ambassadors statements. He did, however, want to make a statement of his own regarding one of the proposed clauses. He coughed to clear his throat and stood up, adjusting the microphone as he did.

"Hindopia wishes express our approval of this condemnation. Any nation that routinely executes children on the basis that they may be homosexual deserves not only be condemned but be expelled from this organisation. However, we cannot expel a nation on that basis so we must condemn only. We are not entirely happy with the "FURTHER REALIZING" clause as it seems to be a weak statement. There is no reason to condemn Great Nepal on the basis of it "searching for cheap nuclear weapons" or "gloating about having nuclear weapons". Also, the clause declaring the WA to be "UNNERVED" about the nation donating to Nazi and fascist organisations worries us. Hindopia is very proud of our extensive civil and political freedoms and a pillar of those is free speech. The Hindopian Government considers political donations an integral part of free speech. We would not like to see a resolution that condemns such actions. If the honored delegation for Denecaep would consider addressing these issues it would be very much appreciated.

----
Ambassador Harrowsing, for Hindopia

Harrowsing resumed his chair and tried to look busy shuffling papers and what-not.
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10025
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:47 pm

South Norwega wrote:
Righto, let's have a go.

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.

INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.

UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal


There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.

FURTHER REALIZING:
d. Has purposely threatened to use and has actively used nuclear weapons on both WA and non-WA nations alike.

Might need rephrasing, but the above is in essence true.
Last edited by Eastfield Lodge on Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:52 pm

South Norwega wrote:Righto, let's have a go.

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.

INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.

UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal


There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.



The thing that makes Great Nepal stand out, and was the action that prompted this was the "INSULTED" clause.
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:53 pm

Changes have been made, please review resolution again!
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:55 pm

Of the Quendi wrote:
From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?


Precisely. Great Nepal is no worse than so many other nations and i doubt that this can go through.


See "INSULTED" clause.
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:49 pm

Well, I'm actually quite impressed with the improvements. Good job!

I'm sure there are "tweaks" in order, however I'm not really available to dig deep and discover them at the moment... I'll take a look at it when I have time.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Denecaep
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1834
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:37 pm

So do you, honored ambassadors, think it is ready to be submitted?
Founding Senator Dene Caep of the NSG Senate

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38270
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 pm

LOL, it's about time Great Nepal got a condemnation.
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Picklepoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1167
Founded: Oct 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Picklepoo » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 pm

This is horrible! We must condemn him!!!! >:(
Just call me Pickle

Zombies are fucking awesome...

I am so into NS porn...pointless threads really just turn me on! Wait until I'm done my fan fiction...we're going to have nation on nation action here!~ Scarsaw

A daddy bull and his boy bull are standing on a hill, overlooking a valley of cows.

The son says "Hey dad, let's run down there a fuck two of those cows!"

And the dad says, "Son, let's walk down there, and fuck 'em all."~ ?

Chuck Norris can kick Rambo's ass with his penis!~ Manahakatouki

Its noisy outside with the birds, bees, and their incessant humping!~ Tyr-risuur

Theres a ghost in my shower! And she wont let me masturbate!~ Vanished shame

User avatar
Frenca
Minister
 
Posts: 2991
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:43 pm

Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..
Last edited by Frenca on Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Great Kingdom of Frenca and the Protectorates of The Kingdom of Auatris, The Kingdom of France-Bourbon, and The Kingdom of France and Bourbon
Factbook 1: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=40250 New Factbook!: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=69302
Old Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=37051 Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=44956
My villa. Resting in the archives.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.44

User avatar
Picklepoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1167
Founded: Oct 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Picklepoo » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:45 pm

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuclear wastelands. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old.

WTF is wrong with this guy!?
Just call me Pickle

Zombies are fucking awesome...

I am so into NS porn...pointless threads really just turn me on! Wait until I'm done my fan fiction...we're going to have nation on nation action here!~ Scarsaw

A daddy bull and his boy bull are standing on a hill, overlooking a valley of cows.

The son says "Hey dad, let's run down there a fuck two of those cows!"

And the dad says, "Son, let's walk down there, and fuck 'em all."~ ?

Chuck Norris can kick Rambo's ass with his penis!~ Manahakatouki

Its noisy outside with the birds, bees, and their incessant humping!~ Tyr-risuur

Theres a ghost in my shower! And she wont let me masturbate!~ Vanished shame

User avatar
Pythria
Minister
 
Posts: 2664
Founded: Feb 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pythria » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:46 pm

I agree wholeheartedly with this proposal. If it reaches the floor, I will definitely vote for it.
Last edited by Pythria on Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pythria
Minister
 
Posts: 2664
Founded: Feb 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pythria » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:48 pm

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..

Wow, I wasn't even aware of stuff like that. Jerk...
Last edited by Pythria on Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
New Amerik
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8801
Founded: Feb 08, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby New Amerik » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:48 pm

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..


Hmmm..can I get links? I wish to see this. I've heard of threatening full warfare against them, but never anyone actually nuking them. That's madness. insanity.
The Basics of New Amerik
Factbook | Portfolio | Resurrection Offered (Storefront) | Embassy
Founder of the ROUS
*NALOW 5 = Open Peace
NALOW 4 =
NALOW 3 = Defensive Actions
NALOW 2 = Open War
NALOW 1 = Total War
NALOW 0 = Blackout

User avatar
Frenca
Minister
 
Posts: 2991
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:49 pm

Picklepoo wrote:
Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuclear wastelands. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old.

WTF is wrong with this guy!?

I'm his friend in some RPs but when you talk about the nation of Great Nepal when not RPing, I hate his guts and he is VERY insane.
P.S. When he nuked me and Des-Bal and Reich1 did too, I was dumb enough to godmode.
The Great Kingdom of Frenca and the Protectorates of The Kingdom of Auatris, The Kingdom of France-Bourbon, and The Kingdom of France and Bourbon
Factbook 1: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=40250 New Factbook!: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=69302
Old Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=37051 Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=44956
My villa. Resting in the archives.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.44

User avatar
East Fancainia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6068
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby East Fancainia » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:50 pm

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..

Yeah GN likes to nuke everything, in fact one time, I joined in a war against him and he sent 30 nukes, I just used my Ignore Lasers to shoot them down.

User avatar
Frenca
Minister
 
Posts: 2991
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:52 pm

Link 1 (The posts in the beginning looked okay, in the middle everything got heated, and in the end it was better):
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=36977
The Great Kingdom of Frenca and the Protectorates of The Kingdom of Auatris, The Kingdom of France-Bourbon, and The Kingdom of France and Bourbon
Factbook 1: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=40250 New Factbook!: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=69302
Old Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=37051 Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=44956
My villa. Resting in the archives.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.44

User avatar
Frenca
Minister
 
Posts: 2991
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:56 pm

Linky 2:
(Yes, I bullied along but I didn't nuke him as bad as GN did! And I always godmoded when I was new, trust me.)
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=39703&start=0
The Great Kingdom of Frenca and the Protectorates of The Kingdom of Auatris, The Kingdom of France-Bourbon, and The Kingdom of France and Bourbon
Factbook 1: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=40250 New Factbook!: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=69302
Old Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=37051 Embassies: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=44956
My villa. Resting in the archives.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.44

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads