by Annihilators of Chan Island » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:19 pm
by Trotterdam » Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:02 pm
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:56 am
by Australian rePublic » Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:19 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:04 am
by Australian rePublic » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:27 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:28 am
by Australian rePublic » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:33 am
by Katalaysia » Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:01 am
Annihilators of Chan Island wrote:After ruffian John Smith was locked up for petty crimes days before local elections, a battalion Not an edit, just wanting to mention how much I love the idea of a battalion of anything. of John Smiths across the nation were furious that their right to vote was denied.
validity: nations that are democratic and deny prisoners the right to vote
[option] "It isn't fair!" cries unlikely voting rights advocate John Smith, normally a lobbyist for a @@MAJORINDUSTY@@ group,"I didn't go around doing bad things, I didn't get arrested, so why am I denied the right to vote? You need to implement a voter ID law based on foolproof measures, such as fingerprints and iris identification. That way this confusion cannot happen again!"
[effect] polling booths are very technologically advanced.
[option] "I have a better idea," contributes @@RANDOMNAME@@, a peanut gallery connoisseur, "How about giving prisoners the right to vote? Then this whole fiasco wouldn't happen in the first place."
[effect] the single-issue PlayPlatforms for Prisoners Party won several council seats
[option] "This whole voting thing really is a pain," says your heavily tattooed cousin,once againThis may be the first issue someone gets that has your cousin in it., "Just seize power and be the dictator of @@NAME@@. You know they will just keep voting for you over and over and over again, so why not just formalize it with this final move? Bonus points for the fact that there will be no more issues about names and voting rights."
[effect] democracy was repealed after a bizarre names fiasco
[option] "No need to be that drastic," notes @@RANDOMNAME@@, one of your aides, "But it must be noted that "John Smith" is a very popular name among certain minorities that don't vote for you. Maybe if you made sure that people with the same name as a criminal couldn't vote, you'd secure a bigger margin of victory next election. Just saying."
[effect] expectant parents extensively research old court records before naming their child
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:15 am
by Trotterdam » Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:24 am
The real problem is that if it's just one person messing up, it wouldn't really be a political issue worthy of @@LEADER@@'s attention - or if it were, it'd be about how to deal with government workers who make mistakes, not so much about the specific mistake that happened to be made this time.Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Agree here. It's a funny premise, but stretches verisimilitude.
Data errors can happen, of course, and it might be believable if we were to introduce an intern carrying out a data-entry error that accidentally excludes everyone by that name from voting. That way, systems are in place, its just that they went wrong.
How would that help? "Smith" is still clearly English, and using Mr. instead of repeating the first name, a common typographical element used to suggest "you know this guy", runs afoul of that you don't know this guy, because it's someone else with the same name, not who we were talking about before.Candlewhisper Archive wrote:One trick you can do is go @@RANDOMMALEFIRSTNAME@@ Smith, and then subsequently refer to him as "Mr. Smith".
Names sharing an etymology with John, sure. That exact spelling? I don't think so.Australian Republic wrote:Smith is the part that implies Anglosphere. John is pretty common throughout most European languages.
...Don't be ridiculous.Australian Republic wrote:Mother in every language starts with M,
..."Mother" isn't a surname in English. Or at least not one I've ever heard.Australian Republic wrote:so it's pretty safe to say M is quite universal to use as a surname.
Hmm, is it? I remember an old joke:Australian Republic wrote:A different approach, Mohammed is the most popular first name in the world, Lee is the most popular surname
If you use Mohammed Lee, that will not only be very likely name,
How can you tell which are the same or different cousins?Candlewhisper Archive wrote:So far 5 of Leader's cousins are mentioned in issues, just for the record.
by Annihilators of Chan Island » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:19 pm
Australian Republic wrote:Anothe problem-For nations without compulsory voting, this is a contradiction to it
Also, you could have some left field statistician being very happy because you compare results with all the John Smiths voting, vs results without the John Smiths
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:So far 5 of Leader's cousins are mentioned in issues, just for the record.
Gnejs wrote:In any case too few of the characters are named John Smith!
by Katalaysia » Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:26 pm
by Maljaratas » Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:53 pm
by Australian rePublic » Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:32 pm
by Australian rePublic » Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
by Trotterdam » Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:11 pm
I don't know what this "Totterdam" did, but I'm pretty sure I have nothing to do with it.Australian Republic wrote:Totterdam, that bloody hypocrite, he tells me I'm not allowed to inform people of my trademark of writing "ISSUE IDEA", but he's allowed to copyright the entire name Mohammed?
by Annihilators of Chan Island » Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:08 pm
Katalaysia wrote:The first option still has John Smith, just to let you know.
Australian Republic wrote:Option 1-People who aren't on social security would not have social security numbers
Australian Republic wrote:Totterdam, that bloody hypocrite, he tells me I'm not allowed to inform people of my trademark of writing "ISSUE IDEA", but he's allowed to copyright the entire name Mohammed?
Anyway, you can't copyright Mohammed, it's in the list of RANDOMNAMES
Also, Sheldon neither specified a spelling of Mohammed nor Lee. You can use any spelling you desire. When you break it down into all the possible spellings, it's probably not any more common than any other name
Trotterdam wrote:I don't know what this "Totterdam" did, but I'm pretty sure I have nothing to do with it.Australian Republic wrote:Totterdam, that bloody hypocrite, he tells me I'm not allowed to inform people of my trademark of writing "ISSUE IDEA", but he's allowed to copyright the entire name Mohammed?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:41 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:So far 5 of Leader's cousins are mentioned in issues, just for the record.
Where did you get that number? I'm very interest to see.
by Troperia » Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:55 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Candlewhisper Archive wrote:So far 5 of Leader's cousins are mentioned in issues, just for the record.
Raw data for the live issues. Ctrl+F. Cousin. 14 instances of the word.
Then I looked through and counted how many times we were referring to Leader's cousin.
You can do the same thing from the spoiler thread, as all the mentions are in options, not effects,
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:08 am
Annihilators of Chan Island wrote:Please no arguing in this thread, thanks. If you HAVE to feud somewhere, might I suggest a field, 2 flintlock pistols and an impartial judge to preside?
Annihilators of Chan Island wrote:A few days ago, just before local elections were due to run, a ruffian named Mohammed Lee was imprisoned for petty crimes. As per policy, this excluded him from the right to vote, but due to some sort of administrative error others of the same name - a whole battalion of Mohammed Lees across the nation - also found themselves blocked at the polling stations.
validity: democracy, has prisons, no votes for prisoners,
[option] "It isn't right!" cries unlikely voting rights advocate Mohammed Lee, normally a prominent @@MAJORINDUSTY@@ lobbyist,"I have committed no crime save sharing the prisoner's name, but I have been denied my basic democratic rights! We must implement a Voter-ID system based on foolproof measures: passports, social security numbers, fingerprints and iris-identification. Identity confusion cannot be allowed to happen again!"
[effect]polling booths are very technologically advanced.
[option] "I have a better idea," contributes Mohammed Lee, a peanut gallery connoisseur," How about giving prisoners the right to vote? Then this whole fiasco wouldn't happen in the first place."
[effect] in a recent election the single-issue PlayPlatforms for Prisoners Party won several local council seats
[option] "This whole voting thing really is a pain," says your heavily tattooed cousin twice-removed, Mohammed Lee, once again," just seize power and be dictator of @@NAME@@. You know they will just keep voting for you over and over and over again, so why not just formalize it with this final move. Bonus points for the fact that there will be no more issues about names and voting rights."
[effect] democracy was repealed after a bizarre names fiasco
[option] "No need to be that drastic," notes @@RANDOMNAME@@, one of your aides," but it must be noted that 'Mohammed Lee' is a very popular name among certain minorities that don't vote for you. Maybe if you made sure that people with the same name as a criminal couldn't vote, you'd secure a bigger margin of victory next election. Just saying."
[effect] expectant parents extensively research old court records before naming their child
by Australian rePublic » Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:34 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Sep 01, 2016 10:09 am
by Annihilators of Chan Island » Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:01 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:The title is a B- for me at the moment. Apt, but not particularly giggleworthy or clever.
Let's brainstorm on that one.
Stop, In The Name of The Lawbreaker
Elections All Locked Up
The Virtual Prison
No, nothing connecting yet. Any ideas?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement