Burning Up Over A Blue Sky OOC Thread

by **Guadalupador** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:06 pm

Welcome to the Out of Character Thread for Burning Up Over a Blue Sky! The exclusive thread about the Guadalupadorian Military shooting down an Ardokian satellite crossing over Dorian Space!

Within this thread we'll discuss OOC matters in a civil manner.

by **Ardoki** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:09 pm

We should define what we'll include as MT and PMT.

I rarely use PMT, so I'll let you suggest what is on the tables.

by **Guadalupador** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:14 pm

Ardoki wrote:We should define what we'll include as MT and PMT.

I rarely use PMT, so I'll let you suggest what is on the tables.

Alright, 2026 is essentially early PMT to me, so 2016 tech is still well in service, with a few new toys on the horizon. I've got big stuff in development, but barely anything that can be fielded yet. Though GARNET is a serviceable SAT defense network.

by **New Aeyariss** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:16 pm

Guadalupador wrote:
Ardoki wrote:We should define what we'll include as MT and PMT.

I rarely use PMT, so I'll let you suggest what is on the tables.

Alright, 2026 is essentially early PMT to me, so 2016 tech is still well in service, with a few new toys on the horizon. I've got big stuff in development, but barely anything that can be fielded yet. Though GARNET is a serviceable SAT defense network.

I would frankly agree to limit it to current tech, with mentioning the future tech in development.

by **Guadalupador** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:20 pm

New Aeyariss wrote:
Guadalupador wrote:Alright, 2026 is essentially early PMT to me, so 2016 tech is still well in service, with a few new toys on the horizon. I've got big stuff in development, but barely anything that can be fielded yet. Though GARNET is a serviceable SAT defense network.

I would frankly agree to limit it to current tech, with mentioning the future tech in development.

Exactly, though the ASM-135 was originally a US-made Anti-Sat missile created in 1984, it was canned around 1988, though let's say that a Dorian aerospace corporation picked up the designs and made it into a serviceable weapon.

by **Ardoki** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:25 pm

I would prefer the date of the incident to be 2016 (future RPs have a tendency to mess-up my timeline, and since I generally RP in the present the incident will mostly be irrelevant and might even be butterfly'ed away with future actions) ; however, I'm fine with allowing technology +10 years into the future.

by **Guadalupador** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:28 pm

I'm fine with you putting down as 2016, in your canon, you can consider us using a different calendar. I'll do vice versa for my canon events.

by **New Aeyariss** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:31 pm

Ardoki wrote:I would prefer the date of the incident to be 2016 (future RPs have a tendency to mess-up my timeline, and since I generally RP in the present the incident will mostly be irrelevant and might even be butterfly'ed away with future actions) ; however, I'm fine with allowing technology +10 years into the future.

I am okay personally with 5GEN fighters or compound helos, but not with railguns, as a good example.

by **Guadalupador** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:35 pm

Well, it's good that we came to this compromise on technology.

by **Ardoki** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 8:09 pm

New Aeyariss wrote:
Ardoki wrote:I would prefer the date of the incident to be 2016 (future RPs have a tendency to mess-up my timeline, and since I generally RP in the present the incident will mostly be irrelevant and might even be butterfly'ed away with future actions) ; however, I'm fine with allowing technology +10 years into the future.

I am okay personally with 5GEN fighters or compound helos, but not with railguns, as a good example.

Ardoki will use rail guns anyway!

by **Ardoki** » Thu Jun 02, 2016 8:12 pm

Sorry again for not posting in the thread (yet posting here). I'm just looking over some (a bit of an understatement) code, and trying to understand it. Then I have to work on a group assignment.

by **Hatay** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:19 pm

The time agreement looks good. Hatay is set in 2016.

by **Guadalupador** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:37 pm

Hatay wrote:The time agreement looks good. Hatay is set in 2016.

That's good to hear, Hatay.

by **Ardoki** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:52 pm

Do Guadalupador and Ardoki share embassies?

by **Guadalupador** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:53 pm

Ardoki wrote:Do Guadalupador and Ardoki share embassies?

Nope

by **Ardoki** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 9:59 pm

Guadalupador wrote:
Ardoki wrote:Do Guadalupador and Ardoki share embassies?

Nope

Okay, that will leave diplomacy off the tables.

I'll definitely write a news report then, when I have time.

by **Guadalupador** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:04 pm

Also, I want people to post about this incident on all the social media threads, Setsuzoku, Punch, heck even Wigle if you want to. I just want this to feel like an actual International Incident.

Ardoki, you don't mind also responding through policy as well do you? Warn the Dorians and all that...

by **New Aeyariss** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:23 pm

Guadalupador wrote:Also, I want people to post about this incident on all the social media threads, Setsuzoku, Punch, heck even Wigle if you want to. I just want this to feel like an actual International Incident.

Ardoki, you don't mind also responding through policy as well do you? Warn the Dorians and all that...

Technically US and USSR had embassies during the entire cold war. Nihon and Ardoki for sure would have, to be frank, though Nihonese ambassador would not leave the embassy even one during his stay.

by **Guadalupador** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:26 pm

New Aeyariss wrote:
Guadalupador wrote:Also, I want people to post about this incident on all the social media threads, Setsuzoku, Punch, heck even Wigle if you want to. I just want this to feel like an actual International Incident.

Ardoki, you don't mind also responding through policy as well do you? Warn the Dorians and all that...

Technically US and USSR had embassies during the entire cold war. Nihon and Ardoki for sure would have, to be frank, though Nihonese ambassador would not leave the embassy even one during his stay.

Kinda like how the Dorian Ambassador to Gran Cuscatlan acts...

by **Ardoki** » Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:18 pm

Guadalupador wrote:Also, I want people to post about this incident on all the social media threads, Setsuzoku, Punch, heck even Wigle if you want to. I just want this to feel like an actual International Incident.

Ardoki, you don't mind also responding through policy as well do you? Warn the Dorians and all that...

Yeah. I started writing a political rally, where the Dorians will be condemned and where retribution is promised.

EDIT: I tried to post this a long time ago, but it didn't post due to the preview thing and I only just realised. Woops.

by **Hatay** » Sat Jun 04, 2016 6:07 am

Hatay will certainly be backing the Dorians.

by **Ardoki** » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:00 pm

Sorry about my post still being WIP.

I have three assignments and two exams this week, and the programming assignment is a real pain.

by **Ardoki** » Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:00 am

Would the Dorians be willing to meet with Ardokian representatives, to try and avoid conflict and lessen tension?

by **Guadalupador** » Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:29 am

Ardoki wrote:Would the Dorians be willing to meet with Ardokian representatives, to try and avoid conflict and lessen tension?

You can send a representative over.

by **Ardoki** » Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:39 am

Guadalupador wrote:
Ardoki wrote:Would the Dorians be willing to meet with Ardokian representatives, to try and avoid conflict and lessen tension?

You can send a representative over.

Guadalupador committed an act of war against Ardoki. We generally don't send government officials to countries who just attacked us.

If the Dorians are serious about avoiding conflict, they will have to come to us.

Burning Up Over A Blue Sky OOC Thread

Burning Up Over A Blue Sky OOC Thread

Who is online