by Meryuma » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:31 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Ifreann » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:35 pm
Meryuma wrote:A lot of people seem to think that the whole issue of triggers, trigger warnings etc is about "political correctness" or avoiding offensive behavior. I see this on both sides of the debate - from people claiming to be "triggered" by things that mundanely offend or scare them as well as by people deriding the entire concept. It's not about that. At all.
A trigger is an involuntary psychological response where a certain image or sensory cue brings the memory of a traumatic experience to the surface of one's mind. It is real, but also niche - most people do not have "triggers". One can be triggered by something without it offending them whatsoever. For instance, I had a traumatic experience in a hospital and I can't watch graphic depictions of IVs or hypodermic needles being inserted. I can watch gory things without flinching but if I see a needle, my arm will become physically numb, tingly or cold. Does this mean that I'm offended by media with needles, or refuse to watch it? Hel no. I love Pulp Fiction, for instance. But it's still an example of a (mild) trigger. And I do believe that trigger warnings can be useful in some contexts, but they're often overextended. It's a challenge to balance comfort and short-term psychological well-being with the ability to confront and overcome trauma, but it's also very important.
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:38 pm
Ifreann wrote:Meryuma wrote:A lot of people seem to think that the whole issue of triggers, trigger warnings etc is about "political correctness" or avoiding offensive behavior. I see this on both sides of the debate - from people claiming to be "triggered" by things that mundanely offend or scare them as well as by people deriding the entire concept. It's not about that. At all.
A trigger is an involuntary psychological response where a certain image or sensory cue brings the memory of a traumatic experience to the surface of one's mind. It is real, but also niche - most people do not have "triggers". One can be triggered by something without it offending them whatsoever. For instance, I had a traumatic experience in a hospital and I can't watch graphic depictions of IVs or hypodermic needles being inserted. I can watch gory things without flinching but if I see a needle, my arm will become physically numb, tingly or cold. Does this mean that I'm offended by media with needles, or refuse to watch it? Hel no. I love Pulp Fiction, for instance. But it's still an example of a (mild) trigger. And I do believe that trigger warnings can be useful in some contexts, but they're often overextended. It's a challenge to balance comfort and short-term psychological well-being with the ability to confront and overcome trauma, but it's also very important.
Yes, but you can't tell people that or they'll just start screaming incoherently about Swag Jive Wiseguys.
by Alvecia » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:39 pm
by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:44 pm
by Ifreann » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:46 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:You're right that they aren't the same. Unfortunately, there's people on the right and "libertarian" side of things who don't (or won't) recognize that there are some topics that you do have to flag up before discussing in some contexts because they can have very real effects. Equally, though, there are some people on the other side who appropriate the concept when not actually affected in order to try to shut down arguments that they just don't like.
Basically, idiots all the way down.
by New confederate ramenia » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:47 pm
Ifreann wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:You're right that they aren't the same. Unfortunately, there's people on the right and "libertarian" side of things who don't (or won't) recognize that there are some topics that you do have to flag up before discussing in some contexts because they can have very real effects. Equally, though, there are some people on the other side who appropriate the concept when not actually affected in order to try to shut down arguments that they just don't like.
Basically, idiots all the way down.
But what's at the bottom?
by Greed and Death » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:48 pm
Meryuma wrote:A lot of people seem to think that the whole issue of triggers, trigger warnings etc is about "political correctness" or avoiding offensive behavior. I see this on both sides of the debate - from people claiming to be "triggered" by things that mundanely offend or scare them as well as by people deriding the entire concept. It's not about that. At all.
A trigger is an involuntary psychological response where a certain image or sensory cue brings the memory of a traumatic experience to the surface of one's mind. It is real, but also niche - most people do not have "triggers". One can be triggered by something without it offending them whatsoever. For instance, I had a traumatic experience in a hospital and I can't watch graphic depictions of IVs or hypodermic needles being inserted. I can watch gory things without flinching but if I see a needle, my arm will become physically numb, tingly or cold. Does this mean that I'm offended by media with needles, or refuse to watch it? Hel no. I love Pulp Fiction, for instance. But it's still an example of a (mild) trigger. And I do believe that trigger warnings can be useful in some contexts, but they're often overextended. It's a challenge to balance comfort and short-term psychological well-being with the ability to confront and overcome trauma, but it's also very important.
by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:49 pm
Ifreann wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:You're right that they aren't the same. Unfortunately, there's people on the right and "libertarian" side of things who don't (or won't) recognize that there are some topics that you do have to flag up before discussing in some contexts because they can have very real effects. Equally, though, there are some people on the other side who appropriate the concept when not actually affected in order to try to shut down arguments that they just don't like.
Basically, idiots all the way down.
But what's at the bottom?
by New confederate ramenia » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:50 pm
greed and death wrote:Meryuma wrote:A lot of people seem to think that the whole issue of triggers, trigger warnings etc is about "political correctness" or avoiding offensive behavior. I see this on both sides of the debate - from people claiming to be "triggered" by things that mundanely offend or scare them as well as by people deriding the entire concept. It's not about that. At all.
A trigger is an involuntary psychological response where a certain image or sensory cue brings the memory of a traumatic experience to the surface of one's mind. It is real, but also niche - most people do not have "triggers". One can be triggered by something without it offending them whatsoever. For instance, I had a traumatic experience in a hospital and I can't watch graphic depictions of IVs or hypodermic needles being inserted. I can watch gory things without flinching but if I see a needle, my arm will become physically numb, tingly or cold. Does this mean that I'm offended by media with needles, or refuse to watch it? Hel no. I love Pulp Fiction, for instance. But it's still an example of a (mild) trigger. And I do believe that trigger warnings can be useful in some contexts, but they're often overextended. It's a challenge to balance comfort and short-term psychological well-being with the ability to confront and overcome trauma, but it's also very important.
If needles trigger you do not work in a hospital.
IF vigorous debate triggers you do not go to university.
by Ifreann » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:50 pm
greed and death wrote:Meryuma wrote:A lot of people seem to think that the whole issue of triggers, trigger warnings etc is about "political correctness" or avoiding offensive behavior. I see this on both sides of the debate - from people claiming to be "triggered" by things that mundanely offend or scare them as well as by people deriding the entire concept. It's not about that. At all.
A trigger is an involuntary psychological response where a certain image or sensory cue brings the memory of a traumatic experience to the surface of one's mind. It is real, but also niche - most people do not have "triggers". One can be triggered by something without it offending them whatsoever. For instance, I had a traumatic experience in a hospital and I can't watch graphic depictions of IVs or hypodermic needles being inserted. I can watch gory things without flinching but if I see a needle, my arm will become physically numb, tingly or cold. Does this mean that I'm offended by media with needles, or refuse to watch it? Hel no. I love Pulp Fiction, for instance. But it's still an example of a (mild) trigger. And I do believe that trigger warnings can be useful in some contexts, but they're often overextended. It's a challenge to balance comfort and short-term psychological well-being with the ability to confront and overcome trauma, but it's also very important.
If needles trigger you do not work in a hospital.
IF vigorous debate triggers you do not go to university.
by Alvecia » Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:57 pm
by Skeckoa » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:03 pm
These reactions are usually symptoms of PTSD. The same way that buildings have to/should modify buildings to be useable by people with physical limitations (wheelchairs for example), a school should be modified to be inclusive to people with PTSD. Just because something is trigger warned doesn't mean that the student will completely not comply or do the prescribed work, but it at least serves as a warning so that the student can participate effectively and plan accordingly.greed and death wrote:If needles trigger you do not work in a hospital.
IF vigorous debate triggers you do not go to university.
by Greed and Death » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:06 pm
by Greed and Death » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:08 pm
Skeckoa wrote:These reactions are usually symptoms of PTSD. The same way that buildings have to/should modify buildings to be useable by people with physical limitations (wheelchairs for example), a school should be modified to be inclusive to people with PTSD. Just because something is trigger warned doesn't mean that the student will completely not comply or do the prescribed work, but it at least serves as a warning so that the student can participate effectively and plan accordingly.greed and death wrote:If needles trigger you do not work in a hospital.
IF vigorous debate triggers you do not go to university.
by Ifreann » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:11 pm
greed and death wrote:...
by Ostroeuropa » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:14 pm
by Fartsniffage » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:15 pm
greed and death wrote:You have trigger warnings you need exposure therapy. So if Needles trigger you a good friend wont shelter you from needles he will strap you down in that chair from clockwork orange and play 100s of hours of footage of needles being injected into people.
by Shaggai » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:22 pm
greed and death wrote:You have trigger warnings you need exposure therapy. So if Needles trigger you a good friend wont shelter you from needles he will strap you down in that chair from clockwork orange and play 100s of hours of footage of needles being injected into people.
by Ifreann » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:24 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Pretty much yeh. It's why trigger warnings are a little stupid.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Danternoust, Floofybit, Keltionialang, Kostane, Plan Neonie, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan
Advertisement