NATION

PASSWORD

Is the will of the people absolute?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Russo-Byzantine Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 674
Founded: Nov 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Is the will of the people absolute?

Postby Russo-Byzantine Empire » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:06 am

So say that you live in a democratic Republic, except things are kind of going south. Then, the people elect, of their own free will, with no cheating, no vote rigging, no intimidation, to vote in a government with a platform of genocide and returning a minority to the status of slaves. You are the supreme commander of the military, who has the absolute loyalty of all of your soldiers. Do you stage a coup to depose this genocidal government that is supported by the will of the people? In my opinion, democracy should be a privilege, not a right. If the people are using democracy to restore slavery, they have no right to democracy. Thus, a coup would be absolutely justified, as would a liquidation of anyone who was part of the old government.
I am a: monarchist, feminist, humanist, democratic socialist
Republics are never the answer!

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:09 am

I absolutely stage a coup, and this time make sure that we have a Constitution guaranteeing certain rights so as to avoid that sort of jiggery-fuckery. Then, after a short while, I stand down for free elections.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:10 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I absolutely stage a coup, and this time make sure that we have a Constitution guaranteeing certain rights so as to avoid that sort of jiggery-fuckery. Then, after a short while, I stand down for free elections.

^^ This, to the letter.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:11 am

I stage a coup and appoint myself dictator, the nation will prosper under my rule.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Russo-Byzantine Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 674
Founded: Nov 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Russo-Byzantine Empire » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:19 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I absolutely stage a coup, and this time make sure that we have a Constitution guaranteeing certain rights so as to avoid that sort of jiggery-fuckery. Then, after a short while, I stand down for free elections.

But the constitution is no guarantee, since amendments have been repealed before. If alcohol has been reinstated, why not slavery?
I am a: monarchist, feminist, humanist, democratic socialist
Republics are never the answer!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:43 am

Russo-Byzantine Empire wrote:So say that you live in a democratic Republic, except things are kind of going south. Then, the people elect, of their own free will, with no cheating, no vote rigging, no intimidation, to vote in a government with a platform of genocide and returning a minority to the status of slaves. You are the supreme commander of the military, who has the absolute loyalty of all of your soldiers. Do you stage a coup to depose this genocidal government that is supported by the will of the people?


No, it would not be a coup. It would be a restoration of the Constitution.

This is a typical example of the Constitution of a democratic Republic (Italy).

Fundamental principles (not amendable)

Art. 1
Italy is a democratic republic, founded on work.
Sovereignty belongs to the people, which exercises it in the forms and within the limits of the Constitution.

Art. 2
The Republic recognizes and guarantees the inviolable rights of man, as an individual, and in the social groups where he expresses his personality, and demands the fulfilment of the intransgressible duties of political, economic, and social solidarity.

Art. 3
All citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law, without distinction of sex, race, language, religion, political opinions, personal and social conditions.
It is the duty of the Republic to remove those obstacles of an economic and social nature which, really limiting the freedom and equality of citizens, impede the full development of the human person and the effective participation of all workers in the political, economic and social organization of the country.

Art. 11
Italy rejects war as an instrument of aggression against the freedoms of others peoples and as a means for settling international controversies; it agrees, on conditions of equality with other states, to the limitations of sovereignty necessary for an order that ensures peace and justice among Nations; it promotes and encourages international organizations having such ends in view.


The popular sovereignty is not absolute but relative, and it is limited by the law (principle of rule of law), by the Constitution (democracy instead of tyranny of majority) and by the constitutional values of solidarity and equality (democratic republic instead of oligarchic/authoritarian republic), by the self-limitations necessary for an international order ensuring peace and justice (principle of international solidarity).

Hence, a cabinet and a Parliament making moves against these values (such as genocide) would be acting against the Constitution and committing an attempt against the Constitution (plus, of course, various other crimes). Its acts should be vetoed by the President of the Republic and annulled by the Constitutional Court: failing that, as Chief of Etat Majeur of the Armed Forces and as loyal citizen of the Republic, I would be required to intervene to the full extent of my capacities to restore the Constitutional values of the Republic.
.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:06 am

Risottia wrote:
Russo-Byzantine Empire wrote:So say that you live in a democratic Republic, except things are kind of going south. Then, the people elect, of their own free will, with no cheating, no vote rigging, no intimidation, to vote in a government with a platform of genocide and returning a minority to the status of slaves. You are the supreme commander of the military, who has the absolute loyalty of all of your soldiers. Do you stage a coup to depose this genocidal government that is supported by the will of the people?


No, it would not be a coup. It would be a restoration of the Constitution.

This is a typical example of the Constitution of a democratic Republic (Italy).

Fundamental principles (not amendable)

Art. 1
Italy is a democratic republic, founded on work.
Sovereignty belongs to the people, which exercises it in the forms and within the limits of the Constitution.

Art. 2
The Republic recognizes and guarantees the inviolable rights of man, as an individual, and in the social groups where he expresses his personality, and demands the fulfilment of the intransgressible duties of political, economic, and social solidarity.

Art. 3
All citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law, without distinction of sex, race, language, religion, political opinions, personal and social conditions.
It is the duty of the Republic to remove those obstacles of an economic and social nature which, really limiting the freedom and equality of citizens, impede the full development of the human person and the effective participation of all workers in the political, economic and social organization of the country.

Art. 11
Italy rejects war as an instrument of aggression against the freedoms of others peoples and as a means for settling international controversies; it agrees, on conditions of equality with other states, to the limitations of sovereignty necessary for an order that ensures peace and justice among Nations; it promotes and encourages international organizations having such ends in view.


The popular sovereignty is not absolute but relative, and it is limited by the law (principle of rule of law), by the Constitution (democracy instead of tyranny of majority) and by the constitutional values of solidarity and equality (democratic republic instead of oligarchic/authoritarian republic), by the self-limitations necessary for an international order ensuring peace and justice (principle of international solidarity).

Hence, a cabinet and a Parliament making moves against these values (such as genocide) would be acting against the Constitution and committing an attempt against the Constitution (plus, of course, various other crimes). Its acts should be vetoed by the President of the Republic and annulled by the Constitutional Court: failing that, as Chief of Etat Majeur of the Armed Forces and as loyal citizen of the Republic, I would be required to intervene to the full extent of my capacities to restore the Constitutional values of the Republic.

^^This
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Russo-Byzantine Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 674
Founded: Nov 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Russo-Byzantine Empire » Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:49 am

Well, how about this: the government is quite open about being a dictatorship, and the people vote for it anyway. What then? Furthermore, how would you feel about the coup as a citizen, not knowing that it was only temporary?
I am a: monarchist, feminist, humanist, democratic socialist
Republics are never the answer!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:54 am

Russo-Byzantine Empire wrote:Well, how about this: the government is quite open about being a dictatorship, and the people vote for it anyway. What then

Restoration of Constitutional values and of democracy through armed insurrection as per Constitution; civil war if needed. Every citizen has the duty to defend the Republic, the Constitution, and its values.
.

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:56 am

Well of course I'd stage a coup. The very fact that the society is democratic means that it is by its nature corrupt. So not only would I remove the government and erase the democracy but I would make sure I stay in power to build a new communist nation.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:21 am

Go full on Turkey with that shit, pull a coup and prepare for eventual return to civilian government. Why would a supporter of democracy, the ideal, not the process, allow such a blatant violation of basic liberal ideals? Have we forgotten the French Revolution so soon?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:22 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I absolutely stage a coup, and this time make sure that we have a Constitution guaranteeing certain rights so as to avoid that sort of jiggery-fuckery. Then, after a short while, I stand down for free elections.


Hit the nail on the head.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Satterthwaite
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 177
Founded: Oct 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Satterthwaite » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:21 am

No, because there is no such thing as "will of the people." There is only the "will of the majority."

As for your scenario, I don't see someone seizing power from an oppressive government only to relinquish said power. That's way too... idealistic.
THE MOST GLORIOUS EMPIRE OF SATTERTHWAITE

Factbook (under construction)
A hereditary nigh-absolute left-leaning monarchy with an easily dissolvable parliamentary system. Sometimes "socialist", most of the time just a welfare state. Atheistic, but tolerant of religions (sometimes). Insanely high taxes. Emperor above all. Vive l'Empereur !

Basically a benevolent dictatorship, but don't tell anyone that.
Henry: A confused philosophy student, twenty years old, side B gay, revolutionary anti-hierarchical Catholic Marxist. There is no authority whom I follow except Christ.
*this nation does not reflect my opinions IRL and also does not follow NS stats.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:24 am

Satterthwaite wrote:No, because there is no such thing as "will of the people." There is only the "will of the majority."

As for your scenario, I don't see someone seizing power from an oppressive government only to relinquish said power. That's way too... idealistic.

Idealism is just how cynics refer to optimism.

User avatar
Satterthwaite
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 177
Founded: Oct 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Satterthwaite » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:28 am

Alvecia wrote:
Satterthwaite wrote:No, because there is no such thing as "will of the people." There is only the "will of the majority."

As for your scenario, I don't see someone seizing power from an oppressive government only to relinquish said power. That's way too... idealistic.

Idealism is just how cynics refer to optimism.

And "cynics" is just how idealists call realists.
THE MOST GLORIOUS EMPIRE OF SATTERTHWAITE

Factbook (under construction)
A hereditary nigh-absolute left-leaning monarchy with an easily dissolvable parliamentary system. Sometimes "socialist", most of the time just a welfare state. Atheistic, but tolerant of religions (sometimes). Insanely high taxes. Emperor above all. Vive l'Empereur !

Basically a benevolent dictatorship, but don't tell anyone that.
Henry: A confused philosophy student, twenty years old, side B gay, revolutionary anti-hierarchical Catholic Marxist. There is no authority whom I follow except Christ.
*this nation does not reflect my opinions IRL and also does not follow NS stats.

User avatar
Tolko Temnota
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 438
Founded: Nov 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tolko Temnota » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:29 am

I would stage a coup. Democracy's great and all, but tyranny of the majority is not something that should be strived for. This is why we have inalienable rights.
When you begin to see that your enemy is suffering, that is the beginning of insight.
―Thích Nhất Hạnh
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Rest in peace, Dyakovo.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:30 am

Satterthwaite wrote:
Alvecia wrote:Idealism is just how cynics refer to optimism.

And "cynics" is just how idealists call realists.

Glad we had this chat :)

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:31 am

Coup coup shoop da whoop.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Finland SSR
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15312
Founded: May 17, 2014
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Finland SSR » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:32 am

Risottia wrote:Hence, a cabinet and a Parliament making moves against these values (such as genocide) would be acting against the Constitution and committing an attempt against the Constitution (plus, of course, various other crimes). Its acts should be vetoed by the President of the Republic and annulled by the Constitutional Court: failing that, as Chief of Etat Majeur of the Armed Forces and as loyal citizen of the Republic, I would be required to intervene to the full extent of my capacities to restore the Constitutional values of the Republic.

Or they could just change the Constitution first? Or write a new one? Since they got a majority support, a referendum for a change isn't far from being a success.
I have a severe case of addiction to writing. At least 3k words every day is my fix.

Read my RWBY fanfiction!

User avatar
The Sons of Adam
Diplomat
 
Posts: 857
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sons of Adam » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:42 am

I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:44 am

The Sons of Adam wrote:I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?


Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Russo-Byzantine Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 674
Founded: Nov 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Russo-Byzantine Empire » Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:46 am

Satterthwaite wrote:No, because there is no such thing as "will of the people." There is only the "will of the majority."

As for your scenario, I don't see someone seizing power from an oppressive government only to relinquish said power. That's way too... idealistic.

Still, though, a non genocidal dictatorship is better, IMO, than a genocidal democracy.
I am a: monarchist, feminist, humanist, democratic socialist
Republics are never the answer!

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:32 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:Go full on Turkey with that shit, pull a coup and prepare for eventual return to civilian government. Why would a supporter of democracy, the ideal, not the process, allow such a blatant violation of basic liberal ideals? Have we forgotten the French Revolution so soon?

Apparently so
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:34 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
The Sons of Adam wrote:I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?


Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?

So siging this! :rofl:
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Hugdom
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Nov 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hugdom » Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:35 pm

I believe in a Republic, not mob rule. This would be mob rule.
Last edited by Hugdom on Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Bovad, Franners, Karazicu, New Temecula, Statesburg, Victorious Decepticons

Advertisement

Remove ads