Controversial Referenda Seek Passage
Prime Minister Brom (Labour) reading off this year's proposed amendments on EBC.
On the First of July - the customary "Referenda Day" - Eldonians will be voting on two high-profile amendments (among others), which has garnered the interest international media, with many of whom hoping for a "social-revolution" akin to what has happened in Ireland this year.
There are six total referenda on the ballot, but the ones of interest are the two regarding homosexuality, a taboo subject in Eldonian politics (aside from the civic radicals of the Progress Party). These have been long sought-after by the socially (and defensively) conservatives parties, which as of the most recent election has set aside the economic disagreements to pursue a "social counter-revolution."
The amendment process in Eldona requires first the support of 85% of the Eldonian National Council, not an easy feat. Step two is referenda approval by simple majority. The final step in the progress is to gain the signature of the King. King Shär has said that he would enshrine both of these proposed amendments if passed.
The first relating to (not directly mentioning) the issue of homosexuality (and other anomalous spousal preferences) is PA 2015-B (The Definition of Marriage Amendment), which would define marriage as a union between one consenting man and one consenting woman:
Enshrining that marriage in Eldonia consists only of the union of one
willing man and one willing woman and prohibiting the creation or recognition of
any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
PA 2015-B is expected to pass in a landslide, as it was never proposed before on grounds that it was common-sense and unnecessary.
The other, more controversial one is PA 2015-E (The Exception of Homosexual Speech Amendment) , which would criminalize homosexual propaganda as a foot-note to the Freedom of Speech.
Making unprotected the spreading of propaganda in support of homosexuality.
PA 2015-E wouldn't criminalize the spreading of such propaganda per se, but would make it possible for provincial councils to do so, for the National Council does not normally regulate social policy. It is not certain what the outcome of this amendment will be. Opinion polls for this state that ~45% For, ~43% Against, ~12% Unsure.
Dmètria Bàriz, EBC in English