by Pochera » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:14 pm
by Kubra » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:18 pm
by Kubra » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:21 pm
aw cheating that's like putting a flyweight against and welterweight, except here weight refers to quality rather than physical weight
by Eastern Equestria » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:22 pm
by Eastern Equestria » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:44 pm
by L Ron Cupboard » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:52 pm
by Saiwania » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:20 am
by Dooom35796821595 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:27 am
Saiwania wrote:The best Russia has to offer in the Su-35.
by Saiwania » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:48 am
Dooom35796821595 wrote:But I'm afraid not, the F-22 is far superior. Of course we'll never find out in a conflict since the Americans won't export the F-22, and the Russian export model will be of lower quality with ill trained/inexperienced pilots.
by Atomic Utopia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:54 am
by Dooom35796821595 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:05 am
Atomic Utopia wrote:F-22 hands down. It is stealth, carrier capable, not a worthless overengineered piece of shit that did not meet the design goals like the Lightning II, was cheaper than the Lightning II to design, and is capable of speeds near mach 2. All in all a terrifying plane, and tremendously effective.
by Risottia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:06 am
by Eastern Equestria » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:18 am
Saiwania wrote:The best Russia has to offer is the Su-35. On paper it is a formidable threat to any F-22s, it has potential as a raptor killer if the planes were to ever cross paths in battle.
by The Conez Imperium » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:42 am
A 2012 Jane's Aerospace and Defense Consulting study compared the operational costs of a number of modern combat aircraft, concluding that Gripen had the lowest cost per flight hour (CPFH) when fuel used, pre-flight preparation and repair, and scheduled airfield-level maintenance together with associated personnel costs were combined. The Gripen had an estimated CPFH of $4,700 whereas the next lowest, the F-16 Block 40/50, had a 49% higher CPFH at $7,000
by Eastern Equestria » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:55 am
The Conez Imperium wrote:I like the SAB JAS 39 Gripen.A 2012 Jane's Aerospace and Defense Consulting study compared the operational costs of a number of modern combat aircraft, concluding that Gripen had the lowest cost per flight hour (CPFH) when fuel used, pre-flight preparation and repair, and scheduled airfield-level maintenance together with associated personnel costs were combined. The Gripen had an estimated CPFH of $4,700 whereas the next lowest, the F-16 Block 40/50, had a 49% higher CPFH at $7,000
by The Conez Imperium » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:07 am
Eastern Equestria wrote:
Gripens may be highly cost-efficient, but can they do this, or this? I didn't think so.
Also, the F-14 is getting a serious lack of love in this thread. Skip to 0:29 for the sexiest jet engines you'll ever hear.
by Saiwania » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:11 am
Eastern Equestria wrote:Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22.
by Eastern Equestria » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:37 am
The Conez Imperium wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:
Gripens may be highly cost-efficient, but can they do this, or this? I didn't think so.
Also, the F-14 is getting a serious lack of love in this thread. Skip to 0:29 for the sexiest jet engines you'll ever hear.
Nah, I think the Germans had it first, didn't even need jet engines...
Saiwania wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22.
Don't believe in relying on stealth, instead be skeptical of it. Stealth is doomed to matter less as radars outpace any countermeasures to being detected. A better approach is improving jamming and electronic warfare.
The Su-35's airframe is virtually the same as the T-50 PAK FA's and can be easily converted to fifth generation if needed. Sukhoi markets the Su-35S as a 4++ generation fighter and has almost everything fifth generation planes offer with minor differences. It is designed to be as advanced as a fighter plane can get without falling into the fifth generation category.
by Dooom35796821595 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:55 am
Saiwania wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22.
Don't believe in relying on stealth, instead be skeptical of it. Stealth is doomed to matter less as radars outpace any countermeasures to being detected. A better approach is improving jamming and electronic warfare. The Su-35's airframe is virtually the same as the T-50 PAK FA's and can be easily converted to fifth generation if needed. Sukhoi markets the Su-35S as a 4++ generation fighter and has almost everything fifth generation planes offer with minor differences. It is designed to be as advanced as a fighter plane can get without falling into the fifth generation category.
by Laanvia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:57 am
Eastern Equestria wrote:"Best" in terms of what, OP? Dogfighting? Ability to establish and maintain air-superiority?
by Laanvia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Almighty Biden, Cyptopir, Eahland, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, General TN, Glorious Freedonia, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Herador, Mergold-Aurlia, Ogromogo, Plan Neonie, United Desri
Advertisement