NATION

PASSWORD

Best Fighter Jet

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

What is the best fighter jet?

F-22 Raptor
150
46%
F-35 Lightning II
17
5%
F-15 Eagle
15
5%
F-16 Fighting Falcon
15
5%
F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet
12
4%
Eurofighter Typhoon
42
13%
F-2 Viper Zero
3
1%
Su-30
14
4%
Mig-29
13
4%
Other
45
14%
 
Total votes : 326

User avatar
Pochera
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Jun 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Best Fighter Jet

Postby Pochera » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:14 pm

So what do you think is the best fighter jet in the world and why? I think that the American F-22 Raptor is the best since it is very advanced, is a stealth fighter, and armed to the teeth. Sure it is expensive, but I feel that the cost is worth it. While I feel that the F-22 Raptor is the best, I think that other great fighter jets include the:

F-15 Eagle (not a single combat loss)
F-16 Fighting Falcon (advanced and widely exported)
F-35 Lightning II (highly advanced, stealth, set to be widely exported)
F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet (advanced and highly versatile)
Eurofighter Typhoon (highly advanced)
F-2 Viper Zero (basically an F-16 Fighting Falcon on steroids)
Last edited by Pochera on Sun Jun 14, 2015 8:25 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17192
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:18 pm

the MIG-23 fite me m80's
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Pochera
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Jun 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Pochera » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:19 pm

Kubra wrote:the MIG-23 fite me m80's


The MiG-23 is obsolete now and could barely stand up to Iranian Air Force F-4 Phantom II's in the Iran-Iraq War.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17192
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:21 pm

Pochera wrote:
Kubra wrote:the MIG-23 fite me m80's


The MiG-23 is obsolete now and could barely stand up to Iranian Air Force F-4 Phantom II's in the Iran-Iraq War.
aw cheating that's like putting a flyweight against and welterweight, except here weight refers to quality rather than physical weight
the MIG-23 is the best in its class of quality
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:22 pm

"Best" in terms of what, OP? Dogfighting? Ability to establish and maintain air-superiority?

User avatar
Singaporean Transhumans
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Singaporean Transhumans » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:23 pm

SYNCRETIC COMBINE - SINKRETIČKE KOMBINAT
Factbook - Trobojka
JEDNOM ZAUVEK - ARMIJA SINKOMSKA

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:44 pm

Overall I'd have to go with the obvious choice, the F-22. Raptors can, and have, been outdone in turning fights by their generation 4.5 counterparts. Of course, their unparalleled low-observable technology would allow them to intercept enemies completely undetected, and long before any dogfight scenario. They weren't designed with "fairness" in mind. :p
Last edited by Eastern Equestria on Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:52 pm

Jet Li
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:57 pm

L Ron Cupboard wrote:Jet Li


Image

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5384
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:02 am

Obviously the Saab JAS 39
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:20 am

The best Russia has to offer is the Su-35. On paper it is a formidable threat to any F-22s, it has potential as a raptor killer if the planes were to ever cross paths in battle.
Last edited by Saiwania on Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:27 am

Saiwania wrote:The best Russia has to offer in the Su-35.


But I'm afraid not, the F-22 is far superior. Of course we'll never find out in a conflict since the Americans won't export the F-22, and the Russian export model will be of lower quality with ill trained/inexperienced pilots.
Last edited by Dooom35796821595 on Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:48 am

Dooom35796821595 wrote:But I'm afraid not, the F-22 is far superior. Of course we'll never find out in a conflict since the Americans won't export the F-22, and the Russian export model will be of lower quality with ill trained/inexperienced pilots.


The Su-35S Flanker E is a highly capable aircraft which is why China is acquiring the jet. At the least it is said to be roughly on par with an F-22 and can possibly take on older generations of western aircraft currently in service. It can definitely travel at a faster mach speed than an F-35.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Atomic Utopia
Minister
 
Posts: 2488
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atomic Utopia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:54 am

F-22 hands down. It is stealth, carrier capable, not a worthless overengineered piece of shit that did not meet the design goals like the Lightning II, was cheaper than the Lightning II to design, and is capable of speeds near mach 2. All in all a terrifying plane, and tremendously effective.
Fabulously bisexual.
Note: I do not use NS stats for my RP, instead I use numbers I made up one evening when writing my factbooks.

sudo rm -rf /, the best file compression around.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:05 am

Atomic Utopia wrote:F-22 hands down. It is stealth, carrier capable, not a worthless overengineered piece of shit that did not meet the design goals like the Lightning II, was cheaper than the Lightning II to design, and is capable of speeds near mach 2. All in all a terrifying plane, and tremendously effective.


The naval variant of the F-22 was canceled in 93.
The F-22 is also designed for a completely different role then the F-35, and the latter can hover indefinitely. It required a revolutionary engine design and radar helmet, as well as lots of other innovations and upgrades, some of which may be applied to the F-22. Thus the R&D was very expensive.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:06 am

There is no single "best fighter" because there's a lot of different tasks for fighters (which include close air support btw), and operational criteria such as operation cost, time between maintenance, and cost of maintenance.

Overall, my favourites would include
as interceptors, the Su-35 and the Eurofighter, with the good old F-15c coming close
as tactical multirole, the last version of the MiG-29
as carrier-based multirole, the Rafale
as CAS, the Su-25
as interdictors, the Tornado and the Mirage F1, although the Su-34 shows a lot of promise and the F-15e has proven to be a phenomenal machine for its era
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:18 am

Saiwania wrote:The best Russia has to offer is the Su-35. On paper it is a formidable threat to any F-22s, it has potential as a raptor killer if the planes were to ever cross paths in battle.


Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22. You could make arguments for the PAK FA in that regard, but it's not in active service yet.

User avatar
The Conez Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Nov 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Conez Imperium » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:42 am

I like the SAB JAS 39 Gripen.

A 2012 Jane's Aerospace and Defense Consulting study compared the operational costs of a number of modern combat aircraft, concluding that Gripen had the lowest cost per flight hour (CPFH) when fuel used, pre-flight preparation and repair, and scheduled airfield-level maintenance together with associated personnel costs were combined. The Gripen had an estimated CPFH of $4,700 whereas the next lowest, the F-16 Block 40/50, had a 49% higher CPFH at $7,000
Salut tout le monde, c'est moi !

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:55 am

The Conez Imperium wrote:I like the SAB JAS 39 Gripen.

A 2012 Jane's Aerospace and Defense Consulting study compared the operational costs of a number of modern combat aircraft, concluding that Gripen had the lowest cost per flight hour (CPFH) when fuel used, pre-flight preparation and repair, and scheduled airfield-level maintenance together with associated personnel costs were combined. The Gripen had an estimated CPFH of $4,700 whereas the next lowest, the F-16 Block 40/50, had a 49% higher CPFH at $7,000


Gripens may be highly cost-efficient, but can they do this, or this? I didn't think so.

Also, the F-14 is getting a serious lack of love in this thread. Skip to 0:29 for the sexiest jet engines you'll ever hear.
Last edited by Eastern Equestria on Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Conez Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Nov 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Conez Imperium » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:07 am

Eastern Equestria wrote:
The Conez Imperium wrote:I like the SAB JAS 39 Gripen.



Gripens may be highly cost-efficient, but can they do this, or this? I didn't think so.

Also, the F-14 is getting a serious lack of love in this thread. Skip to 0:29 for the sexiest jet engines you'll ever hear.


Nah, I think the Germans had it first, didn't even need jet engines...

Also this thread reminds me of the Indian jet competition...
Last edited by The Conez Imperium on Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Salut tout le monde, c'est moi !

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:11 am

Eastern Equestria wrote:Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22.


Don't believe in relying on stealth, instead be skeptical of it. Stealth is doomed to matter less as radars outpace any countermeasures to being detected. A better approach is improving jamming and electronic warfare. The Su-35's airframe is virtually the same as the T-50 PAK FA's and can be easily converted to fifth generation if needed. Sukhoi markets the Su-35S as a 4++ generation fighter and has almost everything fifth generation planes offer with minor differences. It is designed to be as advanced as a fighter plane can get without falling into the fifth generation category.
Last edited by Saiwania on Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:37 am

The Conez Imperium wrote:
Eastern Equestria wrote:
Gripens may be highly cost-efficient, but can they do this, or this? I didn't think so.

Also, the F-14 is getting a serious lack of love in this thread. Skip to 0:29 for the sexiest jet engines you'll ever hear.


Nah, I think the Germans had it first, didn't even need jet engines...


Well, those noises weren't produced from any engines but from specialized sirens that the Luftwaffe had placed on their dive-bombers as part of a psychological warfare campaign against the allies.

Saiwania wrote:
Eastern Equestria wrote:Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22.


Don't believe in relying on stealth, instead be skeptical of it. Stealth is doomed to matter less as radars outpace any countermeasures to being detected. A better approach is improving jamming and electronic warfare.


Yes, anti-aircraft ground systems are getting much sticker to avoid, and this bodes much worse for non-stealth aircraft than the opposite. Speaking strictly from an air-to-air perspective as we were, the F-22 is still top dog.

The Su-35's airframe is virtually the same as the T-50 PAK FA's and can be easily converted to fifth generation if needed. Sukhoi markets the Su-35S as a 4++ generation fighter and has almost everything fifth generation planes offer with minor differences. It is designed to be as advanced as a fighter plane can get without falling into the fifth generation category.


Yeah. That's the very definition of gen 4+ fighters. Even stealth-enhanced ones like the Su-35S still don't compare with genuine 5th generation fighters.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:55 am

Saiwania wrote:
Eastern Equestria wrote:Considering that the F-22 has stealth and the Su-35 doesn't, you've got it completely backwards. Nothing the Russian Air Force currently operates can touch the F-22.


Don't believe in relying on stealth, instead be skeptical of it. Stealth is doomed to matter less as radars outpace any countermeasures to being detected. A better approach is improving jamming and electronic warfare. The Su-35's airframe is virtually the same as the T-50 PAK FA's and can be easily converted to fifth generation if needed. Sukhoi markets the Su-35S as a 4++ generation fighter and has almost everything fifth generation planes offer with minor differences. It is designed to be as advanced as a fighter plane can get without falling into the fifth generation category.


Stealth is still important as it makes it harder to keep a lock on the frame during evasive maneuvers. It will form one part of what makes the new generation of air superiority fighters, including EW, avionics, limited self repair, elastic wing material, human brain implants.....that or unmanned fighters.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Laanvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1064
Founded: Oct 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Laanvia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:57 am

Eastern Equestria wrote:"Best" in terms of what, OP? Dogfighting? Ability to establish and maintain air-superiority?

In your opinion, obviously.
Last edited by Laanvia on Sun Jun 14, 2015 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Protestant Christian and Proud

Pro: Death Penalty, Militarism, Democracy, Civil Rights, Aggressive Foreign Policy, Political Freedom, Free Syrian Army, Khalifa Haftar, Libya, Palestine, Fatah, Kurdistan, Peshmerga, Freedom of Religion, Some aspects of Socialism, Some aspects of communism, UKIP, Social Conservatism, Family Values/Tradition

Good side of Neutral: UK, U.S., ICC, NATO, UN, Conservative Party (U.K.)
Bad Side of Neutral: LGBT, gay marriage, Labour Party (UK), Israel

Anti: Dicatorship, Radical Islam, Donetsk People's Republic, Luhansk People's Republic, Russia, North Korea, Kony, LRA, Al-Nusra, ISIL, Bashar Al-Assad, Hizb'Allah, Iran, Fattah al-Sisi, Omar Al-Bashir, Military Junta, Nuclear Weapons, Green Party, SNP, Hamas

User avatar
Laanvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1064
Founded: Oct 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Laanvia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:58 am

Kubra wrote:the MIG-23 fite me m80's

Really?
:rofl: :lol2:
Protestant Christian and Proud

Pro: Death Penalty, Militarism, Democracy, Civil Rights, Aggressive Foreign Policy, Political Freedom, Free Syrian Army, Khalifa Haftar, Libya, Palestine, Fatah, Kurdistan, Peshmerga, Freedom of Religion, Some aspects of Socialism, Some aspects of communism, UKIP, Social Conservatism, Family Values/Tradition

Good side of Neutral: UK, U.S., ICC, NATO, UN, Conservative Party (U.K.)
Bad Side of Neutral: LGBT, gay marriage, Labour Party (UK), Israel

Anti: Dicatorship, Radical Islam, Donetsk People's Republic, Luhansk People's Republic, Russia, North Korea, Kony, LRA, Al-Nusra, ISIL, Bashar Al-Assad, Hizb'Allah, Iran, Fattah al-Sisi, Omar Al-Bashir, Military Junta, Nuclear Weapons, Green Party, SNP, Hamas

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Almighty Biden, Cyptopir, Eahland, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, General TN, Glorious Freedonia, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Herador, Mergold-Aurlia, Ogromogo, Plan Neonie, United Desri

Advertisement

Remove ads