NATION

PASSWORD

What if the Empire supported the Confederacy?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

What if the Empire supported the Confederacy?

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue May 26, 2015 2:07 am

Imagine if in the American Civil War, the British Empire entered and supported the Confederacy, declaring war on the United States.

What would have happened?

Would the Confederates successfully secede? Or would Lincoln's forces prevail regardless and crush the independence movement?

I believe that if Britain had entered, France would have followed suit. The blockade would have been broken (the USA wouldn't be able to hurt and destroy the Southern economy). I think an army of Imperials would have marched down from Canada and turned the tide of the war by forcing Lincoln to fight on two fronts. New York would likely fall as will the capital.

Or is the USA too powerful?

What do you think?

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Tue May 26, 2015 2:11 am

The US was already starting to build power, but I'd imagine that if the British declared on one side, the French and/or the Russians would declare on the other. And then the war gets much bloodier than it already was.

And no, the British should not have intervened on the side of pig fucking pseudo-aristocrat slaver scum.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue May 26, 2015 2:14 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:I believe that if Britain had entered, France would have followed suit.

I don't think France would have entered. Instead, it would have exploited the British effort in that war to expand its African and Asian colonies further, at the expenses of the British empire. It was still before the Entente Cordiale, you know...

The Nuclear Fist wrote:And no, the British should not have intervened on the side of pig fucking pseudo-aristocrat slaver scum.

I would go further and state that the British Empire was already the strongest force that opposed the slave trade at the time.
Last edited by Risottia on Tue May 26, 2015 2:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
New Skaaneland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 749
Founded: Dec 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Skaaneland » Tue May 26, 2015 4:10 am

I think the South would've won under those conditions, yes. However they would've had to take on UK themselves if they'd want their nation to prosper after winning that war, as the British already had high demands of tributes before the first war of independance. Imagine the accumulated taxes, let alone the cost for the war against the Northern states, which the Brits would've required. They would most likely also have demanded compensations for persecutions against those loyal to the crown and it would've taken quite some time for the Americans to repay for their rebellion. After that the British influence would continue to be great - unless defeated in the additional war - and once they'd had their share Britain might even had demanded themselves for US to abolish slavery. Economically the whole thing would've been a disaster for the American settlers and at this point even the Indians might've become a serious threat.
Last edited by New Skaaneland on Tue May 26, 2015 4:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
Undo the Taylor report!
Club over group. Club over country. Club over race. Club over sex. Club over God.

OOOOO HELSINGBORGS IF OOOOO

User avatar
Escanthea
Envoy
 
Posts: 334
Founded: Aug 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Escanthea » Tue May 26, 2015 5:26 am

First world war starts 53 years early.
The US army weren't exactly pushovers btw, this wasn't the war of 1812. USA had industiralized in the north, and was capable of supporting a much bigger army than the canadian garrisons. The civil war draft was easily dodged, but if the war stepped up and conscription got seirous you could expect a metirc asston of fighting men to be spewed out. The US only took as long as it did during the war because of bad generals. If some competant leaders got conscripted you can bet the armies in canada wouldn't be much of a threat, they certainly wouldn't be effective as an invasion force, far too much numerical inferiority. The naval disadvantage would've hurt the US to be sure, but a quick assault on new orleans would stop exports in the mississipi and eliminate the need for a blockade anyway. Also, the US had a brown water navy, and Britain didn't, so attempting to take rivers would've been hard. Let's also not forget that since the early wars with britain defenses across the Eastern Coast had their guns pointed towards the atlantic, making amphibious invasion hard. Britain wasn't exactly at its height right now either, so they didn't have an astronomical advantage. Troubles in Europe meant that if France joined an american war they would end up getting double-teamed by Prussia and Italy at the same time while they were focused on the US, so their involvement would've been minimal before they pulled out to fight off all the people napoleon pissed off. This would've been a destructive and pointless war with no clear winner, but the US certainly wouldn't be a pushover, that's for sure.
Last edited by Escanthea on Tue May 26, 2015 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
HRH Justinian Ezkantion- Prince Consort of Ainulindale, Emperor of Escanthea, Sovereign of Dellenaria
"I see now that the circumstances of one's birth are irrelevant, it is what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are."
-Mewtwo

Senator of Ainur
Speaker for the Senate of Ainur
Foreign Minister of Ainur
Co-Minister of Internal Affairs of Ainur
Co-Regent of Ainur
Crown Prince of Ainur
Court Scribe of Wintreath
King of Ainur (claimant)

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15205
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Tue May 26, 2015 5:35 am

More lasers.
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112541
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue May 26, 2015 5:35 am

Escanthea wrote:First world war starts 53 years early. Canada gets torched, usa gets torched, nobody wins

I hardly think Great Britain would intervene on the side of people who's entire rationale for forming a new country was to perpetuate slavery, even if it meant twisting Brother Jonathan's nose.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Devon Teyson
Envoy
 
Posts: 244
Founded: May 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Devon Teyson » Tue May 26, 2015 5:49 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Escanthea wrote:First world war starts 53 years early. Canada gets torched, usa gets torched, nobody wins

I hardly think Great Britain would intervene on the side of people who's entire rationale for forming a new country was to perpetuate slavery, even if it meant twisting Brother Jonathan's nose.

I strongly agree.
Who doesn't like a little rainbow? Not The Perverted Isles!

This nation may have been founded today eleven many days ago, but the player behind it has a long history of being on NationStates.
Californian
The Sacramento Bee wrote:“All workers should be protected, but that’s why we elect an attorney general and pay Cal/OSHA. Other proponents don’t write state jobs for themselves into their measures. We share Weinstein’s frustrations, but Proposition 60 is a legal overreach and too hardcore.”
good job sacto, keep it up

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163860
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 26, 2015 5:49 am

What if Danaerys Targaryen led her army of Unsullied and a Dothraki khalessar though an inter-universal portal to the South to free all the slaves? The two scenarios are approximately as likely.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45970
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue May 26, 2015 5:57 am

Ifreann wrote:What if Danaerys Targaryen led her army of Unsullied and a Dothraki khalessar though an inter-universal portal to the South to free all the slaves? The two scenarios are approximately as likely.


What if the Greys flew the rogue planet Niburu at Abraham Lincoln's moon base?
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163860
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 26, 2015 5:58 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if Danaerys Targaryen led her army of Unsullied and a Dothraki khalessar though an inter-universal portal to the South to free all the slaves? The two scenarios are approximately as likely.


What if the Greys flew the rogue planet Niburu at Abraham Lincoln's moon base?

I wouldn't put it past them.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Devon Teyson
Envoy
 
Posts: 244
Founded: May 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Devon Teyson » Tue May 26, 2015 5:59 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if Danaerys Targaryen led her army of Unsullied and a Dothraki khalessar though an inter-universal portal to the South to free all the slaves? The two scenarios are approximately as likely.


What if the Greys flew the rogue planet Niburu at Abraham Lincoln's moon base?

What if Jul Mdama joined the Union to fight against the Others, then led the Night's Watch to Casterly Rock after teleporting them into his cruiser, and evacuated the Confederates to Asshai?
Who doesn't like a little rainbow? Not The Perverted Isles!

This nation may have been founded today eleven many days ago, but the player behind it has a long history of being on NationStates.
Californian
The Sacramento Bee wrote:“All workers should be protected, but that’s why we elect an attorney general and pay Cal/OSHA. Other proponents don’t write state jobs for themselves into their measures. We share Weinstein’s frustrations, but Proposition 60 is a legal overreach and too hardcore.”
good job sacto, keep it up

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue May 26, 2015 5:59 am

The Nuclear Fist wrote:The US was already starting to build power, but I'd imagine that if the British declared on one side, the French and/or the Russians would declare on the other. And then the war gets much bloodier than it already was.

And no, the British should not have intervened on the side of pig fucking pseudo-aristocrat slaver scum.

Russians really would not have cared, and the French would likely have also sided more openly with the confederates if the British had.

Both the British and the French almost became overt confederate allies as part of real politik to divide the major power in North America. The reason they did not was Lincoln's emancipation proclamation made it clear supporting the confederacy would have been supporting slavery. Both politically unpopular position in France and the UK. I will say the greatest unrecognized genius of the civil war was Lincoln's ability to play European politics.

If he had been just slightly less savvy the covert aid of the British and French would have become overt aid sometime after the 2nd battle of bull run.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue May 26, 2015 6:29 am

Risottia wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:I believe that if Britain had entered, France would have followed suit.

I don't think France would have entered. Instead, it would have exploited the British effort in that war to expand its African and Asian colonies further, at the expenses of the British empire. It was still before the Entente Cordiale, you know...

The Nuclear Fist wrote:And no, the British should not have intervened on the side of pig fucking pseudo-aristocrat slaver scum.

I would go further and state that the British Empire was already the strongest force that opposed the slave trade at the time.


Great Britain doesn't oppose slavery.

Their leadership as sympathetic towards the Confederate cause. Their working class less so but the elites preferred the South.

Also, they were the ultimate colonial masters.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue May 26, 2015 6:29 am

Ifreann wrote:What if Danaerys Targaryen led her army of Unsullied and a Dothraki khalessar though an inter-universal portal to the South to free all the slaves? The two scenarios are approximately as likely.


please don't derail my thread

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163860
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 26, 2015 6:31 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Risottia wrote:I don't think France would have entered. Instead, it would have exploited the British effort in that war to expand its African and Asian colonies further, at the expenses of the British empire. It was still before the Entente Cordiale, you know...


I would go further and state that the British Empire was already the strongest force that opposed the slave trade at the time.


Great Britain doesn't oppose slavery.

Great Britain abolished slavery in 1833, 28 years before America's civil war started.


Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if Danaerys Targaryen led her army of Unsullied and a Dothraki khalessar though an inter-universal portal to the South to free all the slaves? The two scenarios are approximately as likely.


please don't derail my thread

I'll try, but it's a very silly thread and rather begs silly responses.
Last edited by Ifreann on Tue May 26, 2015 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue May 26, 2015 6:33 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Risottia wrote:I don't think France would have entered. Instead, it would have exploited the British effort in that war to expand its African and Asian colonies further, at the expenses of the British empire. It was still before the Entente Cordiale, you know...


I would go further and state that the British Empire was already the strongest force that opposed the slave trade at the time.


Great Britain doesn't oppose slavery.

Their leadership as sympathetic towards the Confederate cause. Their working class less so but the elites preferred the South.

Also, they were the ultimate colonial masters.


At about 15 years after the repeal of the corn tax, the working class had the ability to influence policy at this time even at the expense of the landed gentry.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue May 26, 2015 6:36 am

greed and death wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Great Britain doesn't oppose slavery.

Their leadership as sympathetic towards the Confederate cause. Their working class less so but the elites preferred the South.

Also, they were the ultimate colonial masters.


At about 15 years after the repeal of the corn tax, the working class had the ability to influence policy at this time even at the expense of the landed gentry.


it still doesn't make them anti-slavery

if they were, they wouldn't be a colonial power and their leaders wouldn't have pro-Confederate sympathies

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue May 26, 2015 6:36 am

Ifreann wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Great Britain doesn't oppose slavery.

Great Britain abolished slavery in 1833, 28 years before America's civil war started.


But they continued to colonise entire nations and to buy cotton from slave states

User avatar
St Salvador
Diplomat
 
Posts: 651
Founded: Apr 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby St Salvador » Tue May 26, 2015 6:41 am

theirs a book series called southern victory by harry turtledove if your that interested in the confederacy winning.
me:if the british join just before gettysburg their likely to lose along with the confederacy. The union army by 1863 was just as good maybe better than most european armies. the west coast could probably get a bigger part in the war as well maybe stopping a british landing in california or an invasion of texas via new mexico. it would probably end like the war of 1812 but with the south occupied. The very idea of them taking washington that time around is funny since it was heavily fortified and garrisoned by a large army. oh yeah and will probably ally ourselves with the german empire do to british empires betrayal. which means worldwar ones gonna be a lot more interesting.
In ancient times, men built wonders, laid claim to the stars and sought to better themselves for the good of all. But we are much wiser now.

If the road is easy, the destination is worthless.

Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.

I highly doubt my soul mate is living in Thailand and only a click away.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163860
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 26, 2015 6:41 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Great Britain abolished slavery in 1833, 28 years before America's civil war started.


But they continued to colonise entire nations and to buy cotton from slave states

Buying cotton from slavers and continuing to hold colonies is one thing. Fighting a war to preserve slavery in America after abolishing slavery themselves is rather another.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112541
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue May 26, 2015 6:46 am

St Salvador wrote:theirs a book series called southern victory by harry turtledove if your that interested in the confederacy winning.
me:if the british join just before gettysburg their likely to lose along with the confederacy. The union army by 1863 was just as good maybe better than most european armies. the west coast could probably get a bigger part in the war as well maybe stopping a british landing in california or an invasion of texas via new mexico. it would probably end like the war of 1812 but with the south occupied. The very idea of them taking washington that time around is funny since it was heavily fortified and garrisoned by a large army. oh yeah and will probably ally ourselves with the german empire do to british empires betrayal. which means worldwar ones gonna be a lot more interesting.

The British are going to ship an army to California? How? There were no trans-continental railways and sending them by sea would take forever. New Mexico belonged to the United States and by 1864 Mexico was under French occupation.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163860
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 26, 2015 6:51 am

Farnhamia wrote:
St Salvador wrote:theirs a book series called southern victory by harry turtledove if your that interested in the confederacy winning.
me:if the british join just before gettysburg their likely to lose along with the confederacy. The union army by 1863 was just as good maybe better than most european armies. the west coast could probably get a bigger part in the war as well maybe stopping a british landing in california or an invasion of texas via new mexico. it would probably end like the war of 1812 but with the south occupied. The very idea of them taking washington that time around is funny since it was heavily fortified and garrisoned by a large army. oh yeah and will probably ally ourselves with the german empire do to british empires betrayal. which means worldwar ones gonna be a lot more interesting.

The British are going to ship an army to California? How? There were no trans-continental railways and sending them by sea would take forever. New Mexico belonged to the United States and by 1864 Mexico was under French occupation.

Hot air balloons. Thousands and thousands of hot air balloons.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue May 26, 2015 7:28 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:Great Britain doesn't oppose slavery.

Uh uh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue May 26, 2015 7:29 am

Ifreann wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:The British are going to ship an army to California? How? There were no trans-continental railways and sending them by sea would take forever. New Mexico belonged to the United States and by 1864 Mexico was under French occupation.

Hot air balloons. Thousands and thousands of hot air balloons.

Just march the Highlanders through Canada.

...

:rofl:
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, DataDyneIrkenAlliance, Foxyshire, Glorious Freedonia, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Inferior, Jerzylvania, Moreistan, Ors Might, The Caleshan Valkyrie, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads