NATION

PASSWORD

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Females Only?

It's sexist
24
77%
No... no its not (please explain)
7
23%
 
Total votes : 31

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39284
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:34 am

I can't speak for any other place because I don't have extensive experience perusing rent ads in those places.

But in British Columbia, more often than not (too often) you have posted ads over the internet that says a given place is only going to be rented to females.

''Females Only.''

I'm not going to comment on the legality of it (it might not even be legal) but isn't it technically discrimination? I think it is. Its also problematic because it makes it that much harder for a male to secure a place to stay in a part of the country where owning a house is becoming increasingly impossible due to outrageous housing prices.

I'm pretty sure if the ad had said instead, ''Whites Only'' or ''Straight People Only'' there would be a serious outcry of some kind. That would clearly be discrimination. So why is it okay to advertise a rent offer as being only open to ''females''?

I have an uncle who also only rents his place to ''females.'' He tells me that its because males are more likely to ''cause trouble'' or ''be messy.'' I wonder how pervasive this stereotype is.

What do you think?

Is it sexism to rent only to females? Why or why not?
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Parhe » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:38 am

I believe it is sexist. The only exception of sex discrimination I would possibly be okay with is if there were already tenants, I hope I spelled that correctly, and they, or the individual requested only same sex tenants. Though I find it partly funny because I have yet to meet anyone cleaner than me.

EDIT: As for reason why I feel it is obvious since it is purposely discriminating against a group of people, particularly based off something they cannot control. The only argument I can think of is whether this is justified sexism, which I personally don't believe it is, and not really if it is sexism.
Last edited by Parhe on Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39284
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:40 am

Parhe wrote:I believe it is sexist. The only exception of sex discrimination I would possibly be okay with is if there were already tenants, I hope I spelled that correctly, and they, or the individual requested only same sex tenants. Though I find it partly funny because I have yet to meet anyone cleaner than me.


one thing I really don't understand is why sometimes a female on a university campus wants to sublet for the summer. Only ONE person can occupy that room and its not part of some joint suit or anything.

And the rent offer would say...

''Female only.''

Why do you even CARE who occupies your room when you're gone for the summer so long as you get paid for it?!!!

What does gender even have to do with it...
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:44 am

if it is renting a spot in your own home then I think its fine. if its renting a house or apartment I don't understand why it isn't against the law.
whatever

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39284
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:45 am

Ashmoria wrote:if it is renting a spot in your own home then I think its fine. if its renting a house or apartment I don't understand why it isn't against the law.


so it's okay if I rent a bedroom in my house and say on the ad ''I'm only renting to Whites''?

Somehow I don't think that would fly too well.

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Parhe » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:48 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Parhe wrote:I believe it is sexist. The only exception of sex discrimination I would possibly be okay with is if there were already tenants, I hope I spelled that correctly, and they, or the individual requested only same sex tenants. Though I find it partly funny because I have yet to meet anyone cleaner than me.


one thing I really don't understand is why sometimes a female on a university campus wants to sublet for the summer. Only ONE person can occupy that room and its not part of some joint suit or anything.

And the rent offer would say...

''Female only.''

Why do you even CARE who occupies your room when you're gone for the summer so long as you get paid for it?!!!

What does gender even have to do with it...

I never understood why but that may be because sex and gender is usually nothing to me and I don't attach generalizations to either. But I know a lot of people like to generalize others and make assumptions because of how a person was born or decides to identify.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39284
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:48 am

Parhe wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
one thing I really don't understand is why sometimes a female on a university campus wants to sublet for the summer. Only ONE person can occupy that room and its not part of some joint suit or anything.

And the rent offer would say...

''Female only.''

Why do you even CARE who occupies your room when you're gone for the summer so long as you get paid for it?!!!

What does gender even have to do with it...

I never understood why but that may be because sex and gender is usually nothing to me and I don't attach generalizations to either. But I know a lot of people like to generalize others and make assumptions because of how a person was born or decides to identify.


I don't like it

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:49 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:if it is renting a spot in your own home then I think its fine. if its renting a house or apartment I don't understand why it isn't against the law.


so it's okay if I rent a bedroom in my house and say on the ad ''I'm only renting to Whites''?

Somehow I don't think that would fly too well.

yes. when its your own home you get to discriminate. bad wording might cause you other troubles though.
whatever

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Parhe » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:50 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:if it is renting a spot in your own home then I think its fine. if its renting a house or apartment I don't understand why it isn't against the law.


so it's okay if I rent a bedroom in my house and say on the ad ''I'm only renting to Whites''?

Somehow I don't think that would fly too well.

Unfortunately racism is generally frowned upon more than sexism. They should both be done away with in my opinion and all pronouns should be made either gender less or based off of sex (which I though was the case but a lot of people on NS told me were based off gender which leaves me with fewer pronouns to use for myself)
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39284
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:51 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
so it's okay if I rent a bedroom in my house and say on the ad ''I'm only renting to Whites''?

Somehow I don't think that would fly too well.

yes. when its your own home you get to discriminate. bad wording might cause you other troubles though.


I'm not sure you can.

Because race is a protected ground under the federal Canada Human Rights Act (for some reason though, I don't think sex is, maybe they have added it now I'd have to double-check).

In Admin Law we read a case about someone trying to sue a landlord in Canada for allegedly not renting to Jamaicans.

It just seems a bit of a double standard though if I can deny someone a room because of his sex, but not because of his race. Both should be prohibited or allowed.

There are very few cases though because in most cases, people don't bring an application to the Tribunal (they simply move on to a different ad).
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:52 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
New Skaaneland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 749
Founded: Dec 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Skaaneland » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:52 am

They say two wrongs doesn't make one right. It should be legal to niche a certein service for one sex. However I do realise that something needs to be done to combat feminism as they wouldn't have had the same respect.
Undo the Taylor report!
Club over group. Club over country. Club over race. Club over sex. Club over God.

OOOOO HELSINGBORGS IF OOOOO

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:54 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Parhe wrote:I believe it is sexist. The only exception of sex discrimination I would possibly be okay with is if there were already tenants, I hope I spelled that correctly, and they, or the individual requested only same sex tenants. Though I find it partly funny because I have yet to meet anyone cleaner than me.


one thing I really don't understand is why sometimes a female on a university campus wants to sublet for the summer. Only ONE person can occupy that room and its not part of some joint suit or anything.

And the rent offer would say...

''Female only.''

Why do you even CARE who occupies your room when you're gone for the summer so long as you get paid for it?!!!

What does gender even have to do with it...


have you never met someone that gets weird about someone of the opposite sex in their room
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163846
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:56 am

Alyakia wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
one thing I really don't understand is why sometimes a female on a university campus wants to sublet for the summer. Only ONE person can occupy that room and its not part of some joint suit or anything.

And the rent offer would say...

''Female only.''

Why do you even CARE who occupies your room when you're gone for the summer so long as you get paid for it?!!!

What does gender even have to do with it...


have you never met someone that gets weird about someone of the opposite sex in their room

This is obviously discrimination against rooms.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:01 am

That's a prejudice, and prejudices are not a good thing, but there are two points:
First: it's a prejudice based on real facts - males are much more likely - 13 times - to commit crimes than women - check it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarcera ... States#Men
As of December 2013, the male prison population in the United States was 1,463,454, while the female population was 111,287.

Second: it's a personal choice of the renter.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:03 am

Chessmistress wrote:That's a prejudice, and prejudices are not a good thing, but there are two points:
First: it's a prejudice based on real facts - males are much more likely - 13 times - to commit crimes than women - check it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarcera ... States#Men
As of December 2013, the male prison population in the United States was 1,463,454, while the female population was 111,287.

Second: it's a personal choice of the renter.

Glad you support discrimination against black renters.

Also, much more likely to be *convicted* of committing crimes, and go to jail for such crimes, which is a significant difference than much more likely to commit crimes.
Last edited by Galloism on Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Bezkoshtovnya
Senator
 
Posts: 4699
Founded: Sep 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezkoshtovnya » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:11 am

Chessmistress wrote:Second: it's a personal choice of the renter.
And I'm sure it would be a far different tune if it were advertised as "men only".
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
ΦΣK
------------------

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Parhe » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:11 am

Chessmistress wrote:That's a prejudice, and prejudices are not a good thing, but there are two points:
First: it's a prejudice based on real facts - males are much more likely - 13 times - to commit crimes than women - check it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarcera ... States#Men
As of December 2013, the male prison population in the United States was 1,463,454, while the female population was 111,287.

Second: it's a personal choice of the renter.

Oh so people should be allowed to discriminate against whomever they want?
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:12 am

Bezkoshtovnya wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:Second: it's a personal choice of the renter.
And I'm sure it would be a far different tune if it were advertised as "men only".


maybe but it really depends on the circumstances

nobody has a problem with male only roommates or male only dorms, this is effectively just an extension of that
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:15 am

Galloism wrote:Glad you support discrimination against black renters.

Also, much more likely to be *convicted* of committing crimes, and go to jail for such crimes, which is a significant difference than much more likely to commit crimes.


I don't see references about "black renters".
I don't get the difference between "convicted of commiting crimes" and actually commiting crimes: women are 13 times less likely to be "convicted of commiting crimes" so that means women are 13 times less likely of commiting crimes.
It's fair such prejudice that against males? No, I don't think prejudices are fair, never.
But as you can see there are good reasons. As long as typical masculine behaviors (including dominance and violence) will be taught to males, they'll be generally much more likely to commit crimes than women, and some people will take their precautions.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Parhe » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:16 am

Alyakia wrote:
Bezkoshtovnya wrote:And I'm sure it would be a far different tune if it were advertised as "men only".


maybe but it really depends on the circumstances

nobody has a problem with male only roommates or male only dorms, this is effectively just an extension of that

I don't know exactly who you mean by nobody. I have a problem with male only dorms and to a lesser extent roommates.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10025
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:18 am

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:Glad you support discrimination against black renters.

Also, much more likely to be *convicted* of committing crimes, and go to jail for such crimes, which is a significant difference than much more likely to commit crimes.


I don't see references about "black renters".
I don't get the difference between "convicted of commiting crimes" and actually commiting crimes: women are 13 times less likely to be "convicted of commiting crimes" so that means women are 13 times less likely of commiting crimes.
It's fair such prejudice that against males? No, I don't think prejudices are fair, never.
But as you can see there are good reasons. As long as typical masculine behaviors (including dominance and violence) will be taught to males, they'll be generally much more likely to commit crimes than women, and some people will take their precautions.

I guess he's inferring from your conclusion that, as black people are more likely (by proportion of population) to be sentenced for committing a crime (it could be better worded), you'd support discriminating against black renters.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:19 am

Parhe wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
maybe but it really depends on the circumstances

nobody has a problem with male only roommates or male only dorms, this is effectively just an extension of that

I don't know exactly who you mean by nobody. I have a problem with male only dorms and to a lesser extent roommates.


oh then let me downgrade it to most people.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Sexism in the BC Tenancy Market?

Postby Parhe » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:19 am

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:Glad you support discrimination against black renters.

Also, much more likely to be *convicted* of committing crimes, and go to jail for such crimes, which is a significant difference than much more likely to commit crimes.


I don't see references about "black renters".
I don't get the difference between "convicted of commiting crimes" and actually commiting crimes: women are 13 times less likely to be "convicted of commiting crimes" so that means women are 13 times less likely of commiting crimes.
It's fair such prejudice that against males? No, I don't think prejudices are fair, never.
But as you can see there are good reasons. As long as typical masculine behaviors (including dominance and violence) will be taught to males, they'll be generally much more likely to commit crimes than women, and some people will take their precautions.

Point was that some people don't think data justifies, even to a worthy extent, discrimination, regardless of it being sex, sexual orientation, religion, or race.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:36 am

Chessmistress wrote:
Galloism wrote:Glad you support discrimination against black renters.

Also, much more likely to be *convicted* of committing crimes, and go to jail for such crimes, which is a significant difference than much more likely to commit crimes.


I don't see references about "black renters".
I don't get the difference between "convicted of commiting crimes" and actually commiting crimes: women are 13 times less likely to be "convicted of commiting crimes" so that means women are 13 times less likely of commiting crimes.
It's fair such prejudice that against males? No, I don't think prejudices are fair, never.
But as you can see there are good reasons. As long as typical masculine behaviors (including dominance and violence) will be taught to males, they'll be generally much more likely to commit crimes than women, and some people will take their precautions.

No, the question of whether a person committed a crime or not is a question of fact, not a question of verdict. Just because a group is convicted more often doesn't mean that they're actually committing crimes more often.

The war on drugs is a good example.

Women are far less likely to be convicted of crimes when arrested, get lighter sentences, and are much more likely to avoid prison entirely when convicted of the same crimes as men.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:38 am

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
I don't see references about "black renters".
I don't get the difference between "convicted of commiting crimes" and actually commiting crimes: women are 13 times less likely to be "convicted of commiting crimes" so that means women are 13 times less likely of commiting crimes.
It's fair such prejudice that against males? No, I don't think prejudices are fair, never.
But as you can see there are good reasons. As long as typical masculine behaviors (including dominance and violence) will be taught to males, they'll be generally much more likely to commit crimes than women, and some people will take their precautions.

I guess he's inferring from your conclusion that, as black people are more likely (by proportion of population) to be sentenced for committing a crime (it could be better worded), you'd support discriminating against black renters.

Bingo. Black people make up 39.6% of the prison population, but only 13% of the general population.

EDIT: Mea culpa, just checked, 13%
Last edited by Galloism on Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Oriental Sacred Flame, Port Carverton, Rodmenia, The Astral Mandate, Tillania, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads