NATION

PASSWORD

Too Ugly to Rape: How to feel safe in Brazil

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Should he ejected from the government for calling his accuser "too ugly to rape"?

Yes, if they have procedural means to do so.
23
15%
No, it is free speech.
61
40%
There's no discussion with people like this. They are real and there are a lot of them. They use coercion and violence to fuck other people. They aren't even reported most of the time. This man has announced what he is. We should support rape victims in Brazil and around the world. We should find and expose the lawmakers in our countries who think this way. These people are predators, and there is only one way to deal with predators who are hunting you. Find them, identify them, and remove them from the community to a place where they can't hurt others.
69
45%
 
Total votes : 153

User avatar
Eleanor Ritas
Minister
 
Posts: 2373
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Too Ugly to Rape: How to feel safe in Brazil

Postby Eleanor Ritas » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:10 pm

Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/too ... ailsignout

From the article:

A debate about sexual violence in Brazil sparked by a lawmaker's comments on the floor of Congress has spread beyond government chambers, triggering a national debate about rape and sexism in the South American nation.

Opposition congressman Jair Bolsonaro told Maria do Rosario Nunes in Congress he would not rape her "because she was not worth it."

Then, he said it again.

"Stay here Maria do Rosario!" he yelled during a parliamentary session on December 9, the eve of International Human Rights Day.

"It's been several days since you called me a rapist, and I said that I did not rape you because you weren't worth it," the 59-year-old retired soldier yelled at Rosario Nunes.

It was not clear under what circumstances Nunes called him a rapist, as alleged.

The rival lawmakers have been at loggerheads for years, and Bolsonaro was reacting after an angry debate about the 1964-1985 military dictatorship, under which he served and still supports.

His comments have sparked national fury in Brazil, a traditionally male-dominated society where 137 sexual assaults are reported daily.

Angry Brazilians also took to social media to voice their disgust at his comments, while the United Nations called his comments "unacceptable."

Rosario Nunes, a close ally of leftist President Dilma Rousseff, filed a complaint, accusing him of libel and slander, and charged him with public incitement to rape.

"I am not doing it for me, but for all Brazilian women, because no one deserves to be raped. I do not accept in Parliament or anywhere, the incitement to rape," said Rosario Nunes, former minister for Human Rights.

Unrepentant, Bolsonaro said he would not ask for her forgiveness and pressed on with his comments.

"She isn't worth it, because she's ugly, she's not my type. I would never rape her," he told Zero Hora newspaper.

The right wing Bolosnaro is known for his outspoken comments and frequent anti-leftists attacks.

He blamed Rosario Nunes for unfairly accusing him, but insisted again he was not interested in her because of her looks.

"Suddenly, she was calling me a rapist, and she repeated this offence," said Bolsonaro.

"It was an unfair verbal attack, I responded that I was not a rapist and that if I was, I wouldn't rape her because she wasn't worth it," he said in an article in Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.


So, sexual assault victims of Brazil, does it make you feel safer to know that you can prevent future rapes by being "ugly" and "not worth it"?

At least one lawmaker in Brazil is offering you this wonderful path to safety and security!

Could we apply this in other countries?

We could develop a "rape scale", similar to one that is used on "hot or not", and that way people could know whether they're really in danger or not!

"Esmerelda, did you lock the front door?"

"No, I'm a 4.8. I'm fine."

Seriously, though, apparently many people in the Brazilian government and public are rightfully fucking horked at this bullshit.

Should this guy face censure from his government? Apparently they are working on a law to make public statements inciting rape a crime, but did the lawmaker incite rape? Or just say something that is so foul that he should be immediately impeached for openly declaring that whether a rape is a plausible accusation or not should hinge on whether the victim is the offender' "type"? (see above for the quote)

Personally, I think the head people in Brazil should openly demand his resignation.

Whachoo think, NSG?
Kirby Delauter for General Forum Moderator!

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:13 pm

I'm not sure what he did could be called inciting rape.

Definitely marks him as an asshole that shouldn't be anywhere near government, though.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Eleanor Ritas
Minister
 
Posts: 2373
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eleanor Ritas » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:15 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:I'm not sure what he did could be called inciting rape.

Definitely marks him as an asshole that shouldn't be anywhere near government, though.


It will be interesting to see if his career survives this.

I'd like to think (at least I pray) that an prominent American legislator wouldn't say this shit, but I remember something several years back (maybe decades) where an American politician addressed rape with some sort of comment that the woman should just "lay back and enjoy it", but it may be an urban myth or something. I hope it is.
Kirby Delauter for General Forum Moderator!

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:17 pm

Eleanor Ritas wrote:It will be interesting to see if his career survives this.

I'd like to think (at least I pray) that an prominent American legislator wouldn't say this shit, but I remember something several years back (maybe decades) where an American politician addressed rape with some sort of comment that the woman should just "lay back and enjoy it", but it may be an urban myth or something. I hope it is.

This would seem to be it.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:18 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:I'm not sure what he did could be called inciting rape.

Definitely marks him as an asshole that shouldn't be anywhere near government, though.


The same thing could be said about 90% of the people currently in the Brazilian Congress. But I agree, I don't see what aspect of what he said was saying was "incitement to rape".

I'm also interested as to why Rosario called him a rapist in the first place. Seems to me like she fired the first shot and he fired back. If she didn't want to open the can of worms, don't try and pry the lid off.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:18 pm

So... This Bolosnaro guy is an asshole. Not sure what else needs to be said...
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:19 pm

It's freedom of speech, but definitely something that would make the politician a liability to his party.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:20 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:I'm also interested as to why Rosario called him a rapist in the first place. Seems to me like she fired the first shot and he fired back. If she didn't want to open the can of worms, don't try and pry the lid off.

My thoughts exactly.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129546
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:36 pm

Eleanor Ritas wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:I'm not sure what he did could be called inciting rape.

Definitely marks him as an asshole that shouldn't be anywhere near government, though.


It will be interesting to see if his career survives this.

I'd like to think (at least I pray) that an prominent American legislator wouldn't say this shit, but I remember something several years back (maybe decades) where an American politician addressed rape with some sort of comment that the woman should just "lay back and enjoy it", but it may be an urban myth or something. I hope it is.

That was a local weather caster here in nyc, tex antione , or some thing spelled similar. I was lucky enough to witness it as a youth. My mother, may she rest in peace, jaw dropped.

Here ya go
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tex_Antoine

User avatar
Soviet Haaregrad
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16702
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Soviet Haaregrad » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:51 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Eleanor Ritas wrote:
It will be interesting to see if his career survives this.

I'd like to think (at least I pray) that an prominent American legislator wouldn't say this shit, but I remember something several years back (maybe decades) where an American politician addressed rape with some sort of comment that the woman should just "lay back and enjoy it", but it may be an urban myth or something. I hope it is.

That was a local weather caster here in nyc, tex antione , or some thing spelled similar. I was lucky enough to witness it as a youth. My mother, may she rest in peace, jaw dropped.

Here ya go
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tex_Antoine


It was two separate incidents. That punchline is ancient.
RP Population: 1760//76 million//1920 104 million//1960 209 million//1992 238 million
81% Economic Leftist, 56% Anarchist, 79% Anti-Militarist, 89% Socio-Cultural Liberal, 73% Civil Libertarian
Privatization of collectively owned property is theft.
The Confederacy of Independent Socialist Republics
FACTBOOK
ART


There are no gods and no one is a prophet.

User avatar
-The Unified Earth Governments-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12215
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby -The Unified Earth Governments- » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:53 pm

Oh yeah, that asshole.

Second time I called him that today.
FactbookHistoryColoniesEmbassy Program V.IIUNSC Navy (WIP)InfantryAmmo Mods
/// A.N.N. \\\
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.

The Most Important Issue Result - "Robosexual marriages are increasingly common."

User avatar
Eleanor Ritas
Minister
 
Posts: 2373
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eleanor Ritas » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:57 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:I'm not sure what he did could be called inciting rape.

Definitely marks him as an asshole that shouldn't be anywhere near government, though.


The same thing could be said about 90% of the people currently in the Brazilian Congress. But I agree, I don't see what aspect of what he said was saying was "incitement to rape".

I'm also interested as to why Rosario called him a rapist in the first place. Seems to me like she fired the first shot and he fired back. If she didn't want to open the can of worms, don't try and pry the lid off.


So, his reasoning "I wouldn't rape her because she's ugly and not worth it" doesn't reveal something about how this member of the government views sexual assault, in terms of cause, dynamic, etc?
Kirby Delauter for General Forum Moderator!

User avatar
Imperium Sidhicum
Senator
 
Posts: 4324
Founded: May 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperium Sidhicum » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:12 pm

I don't quite see how this guy has wronged anyone besides calling a political opponent "too ugly to rape" in a response of an insult.

Surely, such outbursts do show him in a poor light as a politician who cannot respond to trash-talk civilly, but I hardly see how his comment would make him "sexist", "rapist", "supporter of rape", or even an ordinary asshole. Lack of restraint and consequent unprofessional conduct is all fault that I see in him.
Freedom doesn't mean being able to do as one please, but rather not to do as one doesn't please.

A fool sees religion as the truth. A smart man sees religion as a lie. A ruler sees religion as a useful tool.

The more God in one's mouth, the less in one's heart.

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:13 pm

the poll wrote:This man has announced what he is.

Since this option has had so many votes, I might as well ask what exactly he's outed himself as being. An idiot? It sounds like you're saying he's a rapist.
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Eleanor Ritas
Minister
 
Posts: 2373
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eleanor Ritas » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:26 pm

Tubbsalot wrote:
the poll wrote:This man has announced what he is.

Since this option has had so many votes, I might as well ask what exactly he's outed himself as being. An idiot? It sounds like you're saying he's a rapist.


No, he's someone who has openly stated that whether or not he raped a woman is a function of whether she is attractive or his "type", which means he is someone who views sexual assault in those terms.

He openly said, "I would not rape you because you aren't worth it, you're ugly".

Well...extrapolate that reasoning.
Kirby Delauter for General Forum Moderator!

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:31 pm

Imperium Sidhicum wrote:I don't quite see how this guy has wronged anyone besides calling a political opponent "too ugly to rape" in a response of an insult.

Surely, such outbursts do show him in a poor light as a politician who cannot respond to trash-talk civilly, but I hardly see how his comment would make him "sexist", "rapist", "supporter of rape", or even an ordinary asshole. Lack of restraint and consequent unprofessional conduct is all fault that I see in him.

Implying that the attractiveness of an individual is connected to rape is pretty bad as far as spreading harmful misinformation goes.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Empire of Narnia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5577
Founded: Oct 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Empire of Narnia » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:36 pm

He should be purged from the party.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:41 pm

Eleanor Ritas wrote:So, his reasoning "I wouldn't rape her because she's ugly and not worth it" doesn't reveal something about how this member of the government views sexual assault, in terms of cause, dynamic, etc?


His views are disgusting, but the article said that Rosario was pushing charges of libel and slander against him, as well as "incitement to rape". She had also apparently called him a rapist, which in itself is libel and slander.

It sounds like that he was replying to that call.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:59 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:
Eleanor Ritas wrote:So, his reasoning "I wouldn't rape her because she's ugly and not worth it" doesn't reveal something about how this member of the government views sexual assault, in terms of cause, dynamic, etc?


His views are disgusting, but the article said that Rosario was pushing charges of libel and slander against him, as well as "incitement to rape". She had also apparently called him a rapist, which in itself is libel and slander.

It sounds like that he was replying to that call.

By saying "the only reason I don't rape is you is because you're ugly."

That implies that, had she been attractive, he totally would rape her.

Ergo, her alleged characterization seems to be right on the mark.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:06 pm

"It was an unfair verbal attack, I responded that I was not a rapist and that if I was, I wouldn't rape her because she wasn't worth it," he said in an article in Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.

Sounds more like "Senator, have you stopped hitting your wife?" mixed with bitter political enmity than anything else.

It does not imply that he would rape her if he thought she was more attractive. It implies he's calling her ugly because she called him a rapist.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:31 pm

Galloism wrote:By saying "the only reason I don't rape is you is because you're ugly."


Actually, he stated that he wasn't a rapist and that if he was, he wouldn't rape her because of her looks. That was his response to Rosario calling him a rapist.

That implies that, had she been attractive, he totally would rape her.

Ergo, her alleged characterization seems to be right on the mark.


He's not saying that he goes around raping women based on looks. She called him a rapist, which is uncalled for in itself, and he responded. Did he respond in the right manner? Fuck no. If I was him, I'd have her in the courts on slander charges. Does this mean that he would rape her if he thought she was attractive? No. He called her ugly, which was a childish response to being called a rapist.

Nowhere has he endorsed rape of attractive women. He made a mistake in wording the response the way he did and he should be penalized for it, much in the same way Rosario should be penalized for calling him a rapist.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Romalae
Minister
 
Posts: 3199
Founded: May 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Romalae » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:49 pm

Definitely a ridiculous and unacceptable comment. It also makes the completely false assumption that more attractive = more likely to be raped and less attractive = less likely to be raped.
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.79

Location: Central Texas
Ideology: somewhere between left-leaning centrism and social democracy
Other: irreligious, white, male

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:52 pm

Romalae wrote:Definitely a ridiculous and unacceptable comment.

That also applies to her allegations of the senator in question being a rapist.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:57 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
"It was an unfair verbal attack, I responded that I was not a rapist and that if I was, I wouldn't rape her because she wasn't worth it," he said in an article in Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.

Sounds more like "Senator, have you stopped hitting your wife?" mixed with bitter political enmity than anything else.

Not really. That's a loaded question. This is turning what could have been a scoff and a dismissal of a political opponent as absolutely unprofessional and how dare they, to "I view attractiveness as a meaningful factor in the crime of rape", which has all sorts of unfortunate implications (Which, I freely admit, are only implications he may not have thought about) and reinforcing a common social position that is completely incorrect.

He fucked up. Bad. When you're accused of being a crook, you say "I am not a crook." You don't say "I am not a crook, and if I was, I wouldn't steal from the Jersey state treasury because I'm already rich."
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:59 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:He fucked up. Bad.

He didn't fuck up. Bolsonaro is a spring of spoken diarrhea 100% of the time.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Philjia, The Lone Alliance, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads