[report] How Do We Know the bible is false? Spam thread

[Mavorpen]

I really have no idea how this thread can be regarded as anything but spam. The OP has shown utterly NO willingness to discuss anything and this thread might as well be the OP posting Bible quotes repeatedly.

He isn't even TRYING to hide the fact the thread was made for the explicit purpose of circle jerking.

Yes in fact I was, you see I'm a perpetual.

Were you there

Their is evidence of human evolution as late as 400-500 years ago

You know my response. I don't even have to write it.

[Archeuland and Baughistan]

I've been reported like four times this evening already. Please look at the posts in context.

[The Floating Island of the Sleeping God]

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=320989&p=22522421#p22522421
Adding to the pile. His response to a claim that there's no such scientific dichotomy as observable versus historical is the returning spammy non-sequitur of "were you there". And as a lurker in that thread, I feel it's worth noting to you mods that context does not help his case.

[Archeuland and Baughistan]

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=320989&p=22522421#p22522421
Adding to the pile. His response to a claim that there's no such scientific dichotomy as observable versus historical is the returning spammy non-sequitur of "were you there". And as a lurker in that thread, I feel it's worth noting to you mods that context does not help his case.

I don't understand what doesn't make any sense about the phrase. It's the same as calling someone out for a logical fallacy. You say 'strawman' or 'red herring'. This is like that. 'Were you there' is a simply way of conveying that they do not know for sure about this or that because they did not or could not observe it.

[Farnhamia]

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=320989&p=22522421#p22522421
Adding to the pile. His response to a claim that there's no such scientific dichotomy as observable versus historical is the returning spammy non-sequitur of "were you there". And as a lurker in that thread, I feel it's worth noting to you mods that context does not help his case.

I don't understand what doesn't make any sense about the phrase. It's the same as calling someone out for a logical fallacy. You say 'strawman' or 'red herring'. This is like that. 'Were you there' is a simply way of conveying that they do not know for sure about this or that because they did not or could not observe it.

And you're beginning to make it into a mantra. Frisbeeteria warned you about doing so earlier. You would do well to take heed of suggestions from Moderators.

Were you there

That said, your continued use of this response to events that happened more than 100 years ago are starting to get really old. You weren't there when the Bible was written either, so you can't prove that it was the Hand of God that wrote it. You need to drop that as a stock answer, or it WILL be trolling.

[Archeuland and Baughistan]

Now this will sound like trolling, but I'm not familiar with this type of language. What is a mantra, in NS terms, specifically?

[Farnhamia]

Now this will sound like trolling, but I'm not familiar with this type of language. What is a mantra, in NS terms, specifically?

Something you repeat over and over.

[The Kingdom Historia]

This man created that topic and when he was called out he would either respond with same response or change the topic real fast. He led every one on to think it was an intelligent debate but when things got hard he stopped the debating and repeated what he said before.

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

Meh. I read the OP, I locked it due to the reasons given.

[Archeuland and Baughistan]

Now this will sound like trolling, but I'm not familiar with this type of language. What is a mantra, in NS terms, specifically?

Something you repeat over and over.

Understood, thank you for the information.