UNZ Debate Floor (Members Only)

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

The United New Zealandia organisation (UNZ) is a coalition of nations who are committed to keeping the region at peace, and moderate disputes between member nations. Every nation in the UNZ is equal. It is a place for debates, trade, and commerce.

This is the UNZ debating floor, where decisions are made, deals struck, and international cooperation advocated.

To become a full member (New Zealandia only), or to become an Observer State (open to all), you can sign up here: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=312503

PDA Enactment

Antarctic Research Treaty (Proposed by Esceen) - AMENDED!
Shahak- Sjin Treaty (Proposed by Shahak)
People Determination Act (Proposed by Nova Finland)
Criminal Trial Act (proposed by Orange-Habsburg)
UNZ Condemnation of Sjin (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists) - REPEALED!
The Regional Health Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists) - AMENDED!
Regional Health Act Amendment (Original Proposal by Union of Kiwi Socialists, Amendment written by Esceen)
Nuclear Weapons Ban (Proposed by Kuki-Airani)
Regional Security Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists) - REPEALED!
WMD Classification Act Re-submission (Proposed by Esceen)
The Panama Canal Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
The Suez Canal Treaty (Proposed by Xarcan)
Repeal Regional Security Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
Repeal: 'NZ Condemnation of Sjin' (Original Proposal by Union of Kiwi Socialists, Amendment written by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
Discussion on a Constitution (Proposed by Christian Constantinople)
Australian Colonization Act (Proposed by Xarcan)
Nuclear-Free Southern Pacific Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
Proposed Euro-African Peace Plan (Submitted by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
UNZ Commendation of Lost Phantoms (Proposed by Union or Kiwi Socialists)
Antarctic Research Treaty Amendment (Original Proposal by Esceen, Amendment written by The Eastern Antarctic State)
Approve the NZ Constitution (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
2nd Amendment of the Antarctic Research Treaty (Original Proposal by Esceen, 2nd Amendment written by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
Repeal #2: The Colonization of Australia Act (Proposed by Franceali)
Mutual Stand Down of Arms (Balkan States) Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
Project World Gate (Proposed by Franceali)
Colonization Act (Proposed by Franceali)
UNZ Commendation of UKS (Proposed by Lost Phantoms)
1st Amendment of NZ Constitution (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)

WMD Classification Act (Proposed by Esceen)
People Determination Act Amendment (Original proposal by Nova Finland, amendment written by Sjin)
Recognize Slovakoczechia (Proposed by Slovakoczechia, struck out and rendered void by author)
Suez Administration Act (Proposed by Xarcan, struck out and rendered void by author)
Space Exploration Act (Proposed by Union of Kiwi Socialists)
Nuclear Weapons Ban Repeal (Proposed by Esceen)
Nuclear Weapons Ban Repeal #2 (Resubmitted by Esceen)
Nuclear Weapons Ban Repeal #3 (Resubmitted by Esceen)
Repeal: The Colonization of Australia Act (Proposed by Nova Finland)
Repeal the Antarctic Research Treaty (Proposed by Xarcan)
Territory Protection Act (Proposed by Andermor)
People Determination Act Amendment (Proposed by Esceen)
World Gate Neutrality Act (Proposed by The Eastern Antarctic State)

[Shahak]

Shahak will agree to a treaty with these terms

1. Shahak will be free from a potential attack from Sjin
2. Anti-Shahaki messages will not be posted in the RMB
3. Shahak demands recognition as a country that is not an enemy by Sjin
4. Sjin disarms HALF of their WMDs.

In exchange Shahak will.

1. Recognise Sjin as a Marxist State and not a Dictatorship
2. Will stay out of Sjin's national matters
3. Not post any Anti-Sjin messages on the RMB
4. Will agree to trade with Sjin and create Diplomatic ties with the country.

Please take this in to consideration.

Regards
The State of Shahak

[Nova Finland]

Shahak will agree to a treaty with these terms

1. Shahak will be free from a potential attack from Sjin
2. Anti-Shahaki messages will not be posted in the RMB
3. Shahak demands recognition as a country that is not an enemy by Sjin
4. Sjin disarms ALL WMDs.

In exchange Shahak will.

1. Recognise Sjin as a Marxist State and not a Dictatorship
2. Will stay out of Sjin's national matters
3. Not post any Anti-Sjin messages on the RMB
4. Will agree to trade with Sjin and create Diplomatic ties with the country.

Please take this in to consideration.

Regards
The State of Shahak

The sublime Duchy of Nova Finland will second this motion only if the WMD bit is edited from all to halved.

[Nova Finland]

OOC: how many votes needed to pass a resolution?

[Shahak]

Shahak will agree to a treaty with these terms

1. Shahak will be free from a potential attack from Sjin
2. Anti-Shahaki messages will not be posted in the RMB
3. Shahak demands recognition as a country that is not an enemy by Sjin
4. Sjin disarms ALL WMDs.

In exchange Shahak will.

1. Recognise Sjin as a Marxist State and not a Dictatorship
2. Will stay out of Sjin's national matters
3. Not post any Anti-Sjin messages on the RMB
4. Will agree to trade with Sjin and create Diplomatic ties with the country.

Please take this in to consideration.

Regards
The State of Shahak

The sublime Duchy of Nova Finland will second this motion only if the WMD bit is edited from all to halved.

Sure

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

OOC: how many votes needed to pass a resolution?

Although a majority is desired, it is unrealistic that this would occur. As a result, I propose that the nation's directly involved and half of the member states must approve any resolution. This is open to debate however.

IC:

The Democratic Socialists States of Union of Kiwi Socialists hereby approves this proposal, and hopes that it will bring about the end of Shahaki-Sjin conflicts.

[Sjin]

Shahak will agree to a treaty with these terms

1. Shahak will be free from a potential attack from Sjin
2. Anti-Shahaki messages will not be posted in the RMB
3. Shahak demands recognition as a country that is not an enemy by Sjin
4. Sjin disarms ALL WMDs.

In exchange Shahak will.

1. Recognise Sjin as a Marxist State and not a Dictatorship
2. Will stay out of Sjin's national matters
3. Not post any Anti-Sjin messages on the RMB
4. Will agree to trade with Sjin and create Diplomatic ties with the country.

Please take this in to consideration.

Regards
The State of Shahak

sounds good but i have no wmds there all gone i nused the all on greatscotland

[Shahak]

Shahak will agree to a treaty with these terms

1. Shahak will be free from a potential attack from Sjin
2. Anti-Shahaki messages will not be posted in the RMB
3. Shahak demands recognition as a country that is not an enemy by Sjin
4. Sjin disarms ALL WMDs.

In exchange Shahak will.

1. Recognise Sjin as a Marxist State and not a Dictatorship
2. Will stay out of Sjin's national matters
3. Not post any Anti-Sjin messages on the RMB
4. Will agree to trade with Sjin and create Diplomatic ties with the country.

Please take this in to consideration.

Regards
The State of Shahak

sounds good but i have no wmds there all gone i nused the all on greatscotland

The Kenetic Bombardment System?

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

Shahak will agree to a treaty with these terms

1. Shahak will be free from a potential attack from Sjin
2. Anti-Shahaki messages will not be posted in the RMB
3. Shahak demands recognition as a country that is not an enemy by Sjin
4. Sjin disarms ALL WMDs.

In exchange Shahak will.

1. Recognise Sjin as a Marxist State and not a Dictatorship
2. Will stay out of Sjin's national matters
3. Not post any Anti-Sjin messages on the RMB
4. Will agree to trade with Sjin and create Diplomatic ties with the country.

Please take this in to consideration.

Regards
The State of Shahak

sounds good but i have no wmds there all gone i nused the all on greatscotland

You used them ALL on Graetscotland?

[Sjin]

sounds good but i have no wmds there all gone i nused the all on greatscotland

You used them ALL on Graetscotland?

yes

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

The Kenetic Bombardment System?

I hereby propose a second resolution which restricts both the tests and usage of Kinetic Bombardment Systems

[Shahak]

You used them ALL on Graetscotland?

yes

What about The Kenetic Bombardment System?

[Nova Finland]

You used them ALL on Graetscotland?

yes

Nova Finland would like to request how many WMD sjin had in the first place.

[Sjin]

sounds good but i have no wmds there all gone i nused the all on greatscotland

The Kenetic Bombardment System?

not reconised as a wmd as irl is ilegil to have wmds in space and the us sined it and they are bilding one

[Nova Finland]

The Kenetic Bombardment System?

I hereby propose a second resolution which restricts both the tests and usage of Kinetic Bombardment Systems

Seconded

[Shahak]

I hereby propose a second resolution which restricts both the tests and usage of Kinetic Bombardment Systems

Seconded

I agree

[Sjin]

yes

Nova Finland would like to request how many WMD sjin had in the first place.

I have zero

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

So do you agree to the proposal Sjin?

[Shahak]

So do you agree to the proposal Sjin?

Good question?

[Esceen]

The WMD Classification act would help classify and identify Weapons of Mass Destruction. There would be a scale that rates how destructive the weapon is. Weapons classified 3 and up on the destructive scale would be banned from use and if used would be considered crimes against humanity. WMDs of any classification cannot be used against wildlife conservation areas or areas with human life.

1 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is not particularly destructive. Can only destroy a tiny area of land. E.G. a 5 x 5 square kilometer area.

2 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is Partially destructive. It is not banned, but it is not acceptable to use in a wartime scenario.

3 (Research/Defense purposes only) - A WMD that can destroy a small city and cause severe human harm and death. If used outside of users territory, it will be considered a warcrime/crime against humanity. E.G. Tsunami bombs

4 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a large city or kill large amounts of people. E.G. Chemical Weapons, Biological Weapons, Toxicological Weapons

5 (Banned) - A WMD that can cause a large amount of physical destruction and has the capability to kill large amounts of people. Weapons that are capability to cause major radioactive fallout are categorized as 5 aswell. E.G. Nuclear Weapons, Radiological Weapons

Endorsements: Shahak, Union of Kiwi Socialists, Esceen, Shamdag

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

The WMD Classification act would help classify and identify Weapons of Mass Destruction. There would be a scale that rates how destructive the weapon is. Weapons classified 3 and up on the destructive scale would be banned from use and if used would be considered crimes against humanity. WMDs of any classification cannot be used against wildlife conservation areas or areas with human life.

1 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is not particularly destructive. Can only destroy a tiny area of land. E.G. a 5 x 5 square kilometer area.

2 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is Partially destructive. It is not banned, but it is not acceptable to use in a wartime scenario.

3 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a small city and cause severe human harm and death.

4 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a large city or kill large amounts of people. E.G. Chemical Weapons, Tsunami bombs, Biological Weapons, Toxicological Weapons

5 (Banned) - A WMD that can cause a large amount of physical destruction and has the capability to kill large amounts of people. Weapons that are capability to cause major radioactive fallout are categorized as 5 aswell. E.G. Nuclear Weapons, Radiological Weapons

Endorsements:

Union of Kiwi Socialists politely requests that their Tsunami Bomb be allowed for research purposes.

[Nova Finland]

The WMD Classification act would help classify and identify Weapons of Mass Destruction. There would be a scale that rates how destructive the weapon is. Weapons classified 3 and up on the destructive scale would be banned from use and if used would be considered crimes against humanity. WMDs of any classification cannot be used against wildlife conservation areas or areas with human life.

1 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is not particularly destructive. Can only destroy a tiny area of land. E.G. a 5 x 5 square kilometer area.

2 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is Partially destructive. It is not banned, but it is not acceptable to use in a wartime scenario.

3 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a small city and cause severe human harm and death.

4 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a large city or kill large amounts of people. E.G. Chemical Weapons, Tsunami bombs, Biological Weapons, Toxicological Weapons

5 (Banned) - A WMD that can cause a large amount of physical destruction and has the capability to kill large amounts of people. Weapons that are capability to cause major radioactive fallout are categorized as 5 aswell. E.G. Nuclear Weapons, Radiological Weapons

Endorsements:

Maybe legalise 3 as deterrent?

[Shahak]

The WMD Classification act would help classify and identify Weapons of Mass Destruction. There would be a scale that rates how destructive the weapon is. Weapons classified 3 and up on the destructive scale would be banned from use and if used would be considered crimes against humanity. WMDs of any classification cannot be used against wildlife conservation areas or areas with human life.

1 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is not particularly destructive. Can only destroy a tiny area of land. E.G. a 5 x 5 square kilometer area.

2 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is Partially destructive. It is not banned, but it is not acceptable to use in a wartime scenario.

3 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a small city and cause severe human harm and death.

4 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a large city or kill large amounts of people. E.G. Chemical Weapons, Tsunami bombs, Biological Weapons, Toxicological Weapons

5 (Banned) - A WMD that can cause a large amount of physical destruction and has the capability to kill large amounts of people. Weapons that are capability to cause major radioactive fallout are categorized as 5 aswell. E.G. Nuclear Weapons, Radiological Weapons

Endorsements:

I second that

[Union of Kiwi Socialists]

The WMD Classification act would help classify and identify Weapons of Mass Destruction. There would be a scale that rates how destructive the weapon is. Weapons classified 3 and up on the destructive scale would be banned from use and if used would be considered crimes against humanity. WMDs of any classification cannot be used against wildlife conservation areas or areas with human life.

1 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is not particularly destructive. Can only destroy a tiny area of land. E.G. a 5 x 5 square kilometer area.

2 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is Partially destructive. It is not banned, but it is not acceptable to use in a wartime scenario.

3 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a small city and cause severe human harm and death.

4 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a large city or kill large amounts of people. E.G. Chemical Weapons, Tsunami bombs, Biological Weapons, Toxicological Weapons

5 (Banned) - A WMD that can cause a large amount of physical destruction and has the capability to kill large amounts of people. Weapons that are capability to cause major radioactive fallout are categorized as 5 aswell. E.G. Nuclear Weapons, Radiological Weapons

Endorsements:

Maybe legalise 3 as deterrent?

The legalization of Class 3 would ensure MAD principles for defence, I would support this amendment.

[Sjin]

The WMD Classification act would help classify and identify Weapons of Mass Destruction. There would be a scale that rates how destructive the weapon is. Weapons classified 3 and up on the destructive scale would be banned from use and if used would be considered crimes against humanity. WMDs of any classification cannot be used against wildlife conservation areas or areas with human life.

1 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is not particularly destructive. Can only destroy a tiny area of land. E.G. a 5 x 5 square kilometer area.

2 (Not Banned) - A WMD that is Partially destructive. It is not banned, but it is not acceptable to use in a wartime scenario.

3 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a small city and cause severe human harm and death.

4 (Banned) - A WMD that can destroy a large city or kill large amounts of people. E.G. Chemical Weapons, Tsunami bombs, Biological Weapons, Toxicological Weapons

5 (Banned) - A WMD that can cause a large amount of physical destruction and has the capability to kill large amounts of people. Weapons that are capability to cause major radioactive fallout are categorized as 5 aswell. E.G. Nuclear Weapons, Radiological Weapons

Endorsements:

no sorry bill but i cant let you do that