by Upper America » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:01 pm
by Upper America » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:05 pm
Merizoc wrote:Declare a war on junk food, and start SWAT raids on corner stores. Hey, it's what we did with crack….
by Gauthier » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:06 pm
Merizoc wrote:Declare a war on junk food, and start SWAT raids on corner stores. Hey, it's what we did with crack….
by The Liberated Territories » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:06 pm
by Geilinor » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:07 pm
by Eleanor Ritas » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:08 pm
Merizoc wrote:Declare a war on junk food, and start SWAT raids on corner stores. Hey, it's what we did with crack….
by The Liberated Territories » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:09 pm
Geilinor wrote:Longer recess, healthier school lunches, remove vending machines, and have more frequent physical education classes.
by Russian Socialist Soviet States » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:10 pm
Upper America wrote:School has started up again for me, and as always, my school's implemented new policies, ranging from student conduct to cell phones. But what really caught my eye was the ban on sugary foods. Apparently, we are not allowed to bring in sugary foods like cookies anymore. Not only that, but my brother's school (and mine at that) have banned bringing in cupcakes and other sweets for birthdays. My thoughts is it is to help combat obesity, although there are claims that it is used to keep students focused. Even if it is not intended to prevent obesity, I know that our school lunches are being warped to prevent obesity, because the portions keep getting smaller.
I don't think they're going the right way about this. Banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes shouldn't be used to fight obesity. Rather, we should be encouraging kids to get out and exercise more, and to choose healthy foods like fruits, vegetables, and all-natural snacks. Unhealthy foods are usually more expensive than healthy foods due to supply and demand, more people want to eat healthy to stay healthy, so all-natural foods become more expensive. By banning those, it's hard for families of low income to feed their kids enough food and stay within the guidelines. And smaller school lunches only leaves the kids hungry throughout the rest of the day, and leaves them unfocused. However, by encouraging kids to eat healthy and exercise more, we can not only sufficiently feed them to keep hunger at bay, but we can create a healthier generation.
But what does NSG think? Should we encourage exercise and healthy foods, or is banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes the best way?
by Reploid Productions » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:12 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Eleanor Ritas » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:12 pm
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Upper America wrote:School has started up again for me, and as always, my school's implemented new policies, ranging from student conduct to cell phones. But what really caught my eye was the ban on sugary foods. Apparently, we are not allowed to bring in sugary foods like cookies anymore. Not only that, but my brother's school (and mine at that) have banned bringing in cupcakes and other sweets for birthdays. My thoughts is it is to help combat obesity, although there are claims that it is used to keep students focused. Even if it is not intended to prevent obesity, I know that our school lunches are being warped to prevent obesity, because the portions keep getting smaller.
I don't think they're going the right way about this. Banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes shouldn't be used to fight obesity. Rather, we should be encouraging kids to get out and exercise more, and to choose healthy foods like fruits, vegetables, and all-natural snacks. Unhealthy foods are usually more expensive than healthy foods due to supply and demand, more people want to eat healthy to stay healthy, so all-natural foods become more expensive. By banning those, it's hard for families of low income to feed their kids enough food and stay within the guidelines. And smaller school lunches only leaves the kids hungry throughout the rest of the day, and leaves them unfocused. However, by encouraging kids to eat healthy and exercise more, we can not only sufficiently feed them to keep hunger at bay, but we can create a healthier generation.
But what does NSG think? Should we encourage exercise and healthy foods, or is banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes the best way?
You school sounds very Orwellian.
by Upper America » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:13 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Bring back recess. Even for high schoolers.
Geilinor wrote:Longer recess, healthier school lunches, remove vending machines, and have more frequent physical education classes.
by The Liberated Territories » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:15 pm
Upper America wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:Bring back recess. Even for high schoolers.
Sounds like it may work. But knowing our school schedules, it'll be hard to do this. Plus, high schoolers and middle schoolers may have issues with drugs, smoking, and sex on the playgrounds.Geilinor wrote:Longer recess, healthier school lunches, remove vending machines, and have more frequent physical education classes.
While healthier lunches sound good, government regulations on lunches are already causing problems in lunches, with schools struggling to keep up, and families refusing to buy it because of the rising prices. An increase in funding to schools should help.
Also, they could just put granola bars and natural foods into the vending machines. Again, funding schools should also make this possible.
by TriStates » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:15 pm
Upper America wrote:School has started up again for me, and as always, my school's implemented new policies, ranging from student conduct to cell phones. But what really caught my eye was the ban on sugary foods. Apparently, we are not allowed to bring in sugary foods like cookies anymore. Not only that, but my brother's school (and mine at that) have banned bringing in cupcakes and other sweets for birthdays. My thoughts is it is to help combat obesity, although there are claims that it is used to keep students focused. Even if it is not intended to prevent obesity, I know that our school lunches are being warped to prevent obesity, because the portions keep getting smaller.
I don't think they're going the right way about this. Banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes shouldn't be used to fight obesity. Rather, we should be encouraging kids to get out and exercise more, and to choose healthy foods like fruits, vegetables, and all-natural snacks. Unhealthy foods are usually more expensive than healthy foods due to supply and demand, more people want to eat healthy to stay healthy, so all-natural foods become more expensive. By banning those, it's hard for families of low income to feed their kids enough food and stay within the guidelines. And smaller school lunches only leaves the kids hungry throughout the rest of the day, and leaves them unfocused. However, by encouraging kids to eat healthy and exercise more, we can not only sufficiently feed them to keep hunger at bay, but we can create a healthier generation.
But what does NSG think? Should we encourage exercise and healthy foods, or is banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes the best way?
My Past Adventures: After WorldVytautas wrote:There are two kinds of people in this world:
* people giving a fuck,
* people not giving a fuck,
Drink Vytautas, give a NEGATIVE FUCK!The Burning Sun wrote:...you seem to experience what I shall completely non-offensively dub the Triplex, or TriStates Complex - you spend a ton of time crafting a beautiful work of collaboration, and then you mysteriously disappear...
by Eleanor Ritas » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:16 pm
by Upper America » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:16 pm
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Upper America wrote:School has started up again for me, and as always, my school's implemented new policies, ranging from student conduct to cell phones. But what really caught my eye was the ban on sugary foods. Apparently, we are not allowed to bring in sugary foods like cookies anymore. Not only that, but my brother's school (and mine at that) have banned bringing in cupcakes and other sweets for birthdays. My thoughts is it is to help combat obesity, although there are claims that it is used to keep students focused. Even if it is not intended to prevent obesity, I know that our school lunches are being warped to prevent obesity, because the portions keep getting smaller.
I don't think they're going the right way about this. Banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes shouldn't be used to fight obesity. Rather, we should be encouraging kids to get out and exercise more, and to choose healthy foods like fruits, vegetables, and all-natural snacks. Unhealthy foods are usually more expensive than healthy foods due to supply and demand, more people want to eat healthy to stay healthy, so all-natural foods become more expensive. By banning those, it's hard for families of low income to feed their kids enough food and stay within the guidelines. And smaller school lunches only leaves the kids hungry throughout the rest of the day, and leaves them unfocused. However, by encouraging kids to eat healthy and exercise more, we can not only sufficiently feed them to keep hunger at bay, but we can create a healthier generation.
But what does NSG think? Should we encourage exercise and healthy foods, or is banning sugary foods and lowering portion sizes the best way?
You school sounds very Orwellian.
Reploid Productions wrote:The main problem is that effectively combating obesity CAN'T happen via the school environment alone. Kids will still sneak prohibited foods in, smaller portions may in fact be counter-productive due to encouraging binges when they get home... you need to get the parents to cooperate in encouraging healthier eating habits and exercise habits. There's only so much the school can do, primarily limited to what's on campus. Moreso than treats at school or whatever is in school lunches, the bigger problem is what the parents are feeding the kid the rest of the time and encouraging them to do. Mom and Dad just let the kid sit on the computer playing games all day, NO amount of badgering from the school is going to successfully counteract that.
by MERIZoC » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:17 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Upper America wrote:Sounds like it may work. But knowing our school schedules, it'll be hard to do this. Plus, high schoolers and middle schoolers may have issues with drugs, smoking, and sex on the playgrounds.
While healthier lunches sound good, government regulations on lunches are already causing problems in lunches, with schools struggling to keep up, and families refusing to buy it because of the rising prices. An increase in funding to schools should help.
Also, they could just put granola bars and natural foods into the vending machines. Again, funding schools should also make this possible.
Sex on the playgrounds? 0.o
by Geilinor » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:18 pm
Upper America wrote:Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:You school sounds very Orwellian.
Trust me, the regulations are way too strict. It makes the college campus we're located on look like preschool. We can eat in some of those classes and everything.
Oh, and all the regulations are to make us look "collegiate". I don't think it's working, it's just making us mad.
by Upper America » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:18 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Upper America wrote:Sounds like it may work. But knowing our school schedules, it'll be hard to do this. Plus, high schoolers and middle schoolers may have issues with drugs, smoking, and sex on the playgrounds.
While healthier lunches sound good, government regulations on lunches are already causing problems in lunches, with schools struggling to keep up, and families refusing to buy it because of the rising prices. An increase in funding to schools should help.
Also, they could just put granola bars and natural foods into the vending machines. Again, funding schools should also make this possible.
Sex on the playgrounds? 0.o
by Cetacea » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:20 pm
by Upper America » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:20 pm
Geilinor wrote:Upper America wrote:Trust me, the regulations are way too strict. It makes the college campus we're located on look like preschool. We can eat in some of those classes and everything.
Oh, and all the regulations are to make us look "collegiate". I don't think it's working, it's just making us mad.
If it's a college, why is the school treating the students like children? I thought colleges were far more lenient on some of those rules.
by United Marxist Nations » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:20 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, The Black Forrest, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan
Advertisement