by The Peoples Federal Empire » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:44 pm
by Grinning Dragon » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:46 pm
by District XIV » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:49 pm
The Peoples Federal Empire wrote:Should the WA do something about it?
by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:50 pm
by The Serbian Empire » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:51 pm
by Intelectual Atheists » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:56 pm
by Chestaan » Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:58 pm
The Peoples Federal Empire wrote:Alcohol is a wildly abused drug that is addictive and could lead to death. On the other hand, alcohol supports many economies, and without it, many nations could go into poverty? What do you think? Should alcohol be banned? Should it be limited? Should the WA do something about it? Leave your comments and ideas below!
by Silent Majority » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:00 pm
by Fireye » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:05 pm
Silent Majority wrote:Can we do the equivalent of what always happens in gun threads and start talking about our favorite mixed drinks?
by Alcase » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:07 pm
by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:07 pm
Silent Majority wrote:Can we do the equivalent of what always happens in gun threads and start talking about our favorite mixed drinks?
by Dragonia Re Xzua » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:12 pm
by Chestaan » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:14 pm
Dragonia Re Xzua wrote:Prohibition of just about ANYTHING doesn't work in the long term. Here are just a few examples. Banning alcohol will simply make the creation of moonshine that much more urgent, with the only way to stop that from happening is to make everything too expensive to afford. Banning drugs will only open more opportunities for things called "smugglers" and "black markets" or will simply lead to the creation of homemade drugs, which sadly cannot be completely prevented. Banning guns will have similar effects to banning drugs; more opportunities for firearms smugglers and the black market to thrive. The only way to even come CLOSE to outright banning these things is to make America a surveillance camera-addicted, anti-privacy police state. As you can imagine, not that many people will be thrilled about living in a place like that.
by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:15 pm
Chestaan wrote:Dragonia Re Xzua wrote:Prohibition of just about ANYTHING doesn't work in the long term. Here are just a few examples. Banning alcohol will simply make the creation of moonshine that much more urgent, with the only way to stop that from happening is to make everything too expensive to afford. Banning drugs will only open more opportunities for things called "smugglers" and "black markets" or will simply lead to the creation of homemade drugs, which sadly cannot be completely prevented. Banning guns will have similar effects to banning drugs; more opportunities for firearms smugglers and the black market to thrive. The only way to even come CLOSE to outright banning these things is to make America a surveillance camera-addicted, anti-privacy police state. As you can imagine, not that many people will be thrilled about living in a place like that.
Actually banning guns will lead to a lower number of guns, because guns aren't addictive i.e their demand curve isn't as inelastic as drugs.
by Chestaan » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:17 pm
by Jerusalem and Damascus » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:19 pm
by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:20 pm
by Wind in the Willows » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:21 pm
by Chestaan » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:21 pm
Blazedtown wrote:Chestaan wrote:
Oh they certainly will, but a price rise, such as the additional costs incurred from smuggling, will have a much greater effect on demand for guns than it will have on drugs.
Not really. In the end criminals will still have them, you will have only made them impossible for people without black market connections to get a hold of.
by Neutraligon » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:46 pm
Chestaan wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Not really. In the end criminals will still have them, you will have only made them impossible for people without black market connections to get a hold of.
I'm not arguing for or against making guns illegal, I'm just pointing out that the demand curve for guns is more elastic than drugs.
by Murkwood » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:47 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Neutraligon » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:48 pm
Murkwood wrote:It's like Communism. People thought it was a good idea, it was tried, and it failed miserably, only benefiting crooked politicians.
by Murkwood » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:48 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:49 pm
by Tule » Sat Aug 02, 2014 5:50 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:No to prohibition, tried it, didn't work, total waste of time and money.
The whole temperance movement that picked up steam after the civil war should have been nipped in the bud.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Cerula, El Lazaro, Gravistar, Greater Cesnica, Kostane, Philjia, Rodmenia, Three Galaxies
Advertisement