NATION

PASSWORD

U.S. Marines lowers fitness requirement for women

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Fjormark
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Sep 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

U.S. Marines lowers fitness requirement for women

Postby Fjormark » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:18 pm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530172/Women-U-S-Marines-SPARED-new-physical-fitness-requirement-wont-three-pull-ups-pass-muster.html

The U.S. Marine Corps has quietly walked back a 2012 directive from the service's highest-ranking officer that would have rejected female recruits and officer candidates who can't perform three chin-ups as part of their physical fitness training.
The reason – 55 per cent of the women attempting the test are failing. Just one per cent of men can't complete the exercise.
'Women aren’t able to make the minimum standard of three pull-ups,' Marine spokesman Capt. Eric Flanagan told reporters on Friday.
The startling admission, and the military's course-correction, came after just three out of 15 females successfully graduated from the Marine Corps' enlisted infantry training course in November.


The new rule, set to go into effect on January 1, would have changed the previous requirement – in place for more than a decade – that requires female Marines to execute a 'flexed arm hang', holding on to a pull-up bar with their elbows bent for 70 seconds.
2013 was to be a 'phase one' transitional year, according to a November 2012 directive from Marine Corps commandant Gen. James Amos, with females having a choice of which test to attempt.
'Phase two will commence on 1 January 2014,' Amos had ordered. 'Pull-ups will replace the FAH [flexed arm hang] portion of the PFT [physical fitness test] ... To pass the pull-up portion of this event, females will be required to execute at least three (3) pull-ups.'


What do you think about the lowering of standards required for women to stay within the U.S Marines? I personally think this is dangerous and extremely idiotic, I know that women have the capability to pass the fitness requirements and those standards are there for a reason. If this is really in the name of 'equality', then why do the men have to go through higher standards of fitness and training, whereas women only need to do three pull-ups?

I think this summarises it perfectly:
Robert Maginnis, a retired Army lieutenant colonel, told NPR that 'young women, in spite of all the training and all the best intentions, are not going to be the equal of young men in terms of upper body strength.'
His new book, 'Deadly Consequences: How Cowards are Pushing Women into Combat,' argues that Pentagon gender politics are sacrificing combat readiness on the altar of political correctness.

EDIT:
Yes I know the DailyMail isn't a very good source, so here's others that say the same thing more or less:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/the-hero-project/articles/2014/01/07/lowering-standards-for-female-marines-is-not-gender-equality.html
http://nation.time.com/2014/01/02/marines-postpone-pull-up-requirement-for-female-recruits/
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/female-marines-pullups-2014-1
Last edited by Fjormark on Sat Jul 26, 2014 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:20 pm

I think this is just to appease the feminists complaining about how not a single woman passed the infantry requirements.

But yes, it is fucktarded.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31630
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:21 pm

The quote you used to back up your argument just seems sexist to me.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:21 pm

I don't see how this is a good idea. Maybe in the short run it will lead to an increase in recruitment, but I think our military will only suffer in the long run if women aren't as combat ready as men.

User avatar
Unggoy Star Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 681
Founded: Jul 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Unggoy Star Empire » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:21 pm

Personally, I think that if the Woman can't do 3 Push Ups, then that's a sign that hey, putting her in the Military isn't a good idea.

User avatar
Davinhia
Minister
 
Posts: 2024
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Davinhia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:21 pm

Oh look, a weakening american army.
Year: 2013
- President: x (PP)
- Vice President: x (PP)
- House Majority Leader: x (IKP)
- Senate Majority Leader: x (PP)
Capital City: Grove Street
RP Population: 45 Million
RP Military Population: 37 Thousand
5, peacetime

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:23 pm

Fucking stupid, if you can't even do three pull ups I'm sorry but you shouldn't be serving. They shouldn't be lowered.
Last edited by Washington Resistance Army on Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Austington
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Oct 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Austington » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:24 pm

Unggoy Star Empire wrote:Personally, I think that if the Woman can't do 3 Push Ups, then that's a sign that hey, putting her in the Military isn't a good idea.

It's Three Pull-ups, not push-ups.

And It's not lowering the fitness standard, It's just keeping it the same instead of raising it.
Last edited by Austington on Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Okay so I realized that I talk different than most people. Here is a helpful spoiler for some of the words I use that you don't recognize(This will be updated as I find more words that I use that people don't understand, usually from them asking me what it is)
new fish - someone he feels is noobish or little better than a rookie, not worthy of his attention or recognition.
jack - (in context with numbers) 75
lýtling - slightly better than a new fish; it shows acknowledgement in regards that the person may be of use in the future for him.
dead soldier - a drink, usually alcholic in nature(a umbrella meaning for a draught of alcohol)
tapster - bartender or barkeep
gaspers - cigarettes
Devil's rope - Barbed wire
Draught - container for drinking

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:25 pm

They have fitness tests for a reason. If you can't serve in the Marines, fine. There's plenty of other services that are probably screaming out for recruits that don't have the same stringent requirements where they can serve their country.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
McNernia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5378
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby McNernia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:25 pm

No discrimination.
Polaria
Erin Islands
Kaisong Islands
Al-Azkar
Rhodana
Eragh
Arisal
Kirav
Neu Engollon
New Edom: Clyde Hullar Ambassador
Aurora
Children of Aurora
A Luta Continua
Aneas
Tyrennia
Golgoth
Pardes
Cornellian Empire
Rostil
Sondria
Ajax
Astyria

Greater Dienstad
Minyang
Endorser of the Amistad Declaration
SIgnatory of the Amistad Declaration
IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY RPing, TG ME PLEASE, THANKS A BUNCH.
A Time of Trouble
All my posts shall be dedicated to Tom Clancy. May he Rest In Peace.
I Consider the above to be Canon. Which means I want to RP with you if you've been in those regions. Or Are.

Call me Archinia ICly and well maybe Mcnernia is plausible....I don't know.

Lore change?

User avatar
Republic of Wreptzle
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 430
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Wreptzle » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:27 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:I don't see how this is a good idea. Maybe in the short run it will lead to an increase in recruitment, but I think our military will only suffer in the long run if women aren't as combat ready as men.


Not to mention that it'll get them killed. Physical standards exist to ensure that soldiers don't end up dead and that armies operate well. This will only lead to more body-bags coming home.

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:29 pm

'Women aren’t able to make the minimum standard of three pull-ups,' Marine spokesman Capt. Eric Flanagan told reporters on Friday.
The startling admission, and the military's course-correction, came after just three out of 15 females successfully graduated from the Marine Corps' enlisted infantry training course in November.


So that's at least three who can. Sexist BS is BS.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Altraxa
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Jul 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Altraxa » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:31 pm

I'm hesitant to take the words of someone with a book title like that as someone who isn't invested in their own agenda here.

User avatar
Fjormark
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Sep 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fjormark » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:31 pm

Death Metal wrote:
'Women aren’t able to make the minimum standard of three pull-ups,' Marine spokesman Capt. Eric Flanagan told reporters on Friday.
The startling admission, and the military's course-correction, came after just three out of 15 females successfully graduated from the Marine Corps' enlisted infantry training course in November.


So that's at least three who can. Sexist BS is BS.


That's not the point... Read it again instead of going 'muh sexism!'.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:31 pm

Well, it is just a fact that no woman will ever have as much upper body strength as a man of equivalent weight and size. This is merely reflecting that reality, so as to make it sufficiently difficult but not nigh impossible for female recruits.
Last edited by Saiwania on Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Altraxa
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Jul 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Altraxa » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:34 pm

Saiwania wrote:Well, it is just a fact that no women will never have as much upper body strength as a man of equivalent weight and size. This is merely reflecting this reality so as to make it sufficiently difficult but not nigh impossible for female recruits.


You just need to be strong enough.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:35 pm

Saiwania wrote:Well, it is just a fact that no women will never have as much upper body strength as a man of equivalent weight and size. This is merely reflecting this reality so as to make it sufficiently difficult but not nigh impossible for female recruits.

The average woman might not be able to do those easily but that doesn't mean that a fit woman couldn't. It's not like men are pushed to the absolute limit when they take the fitness test.

User avatar
Kargintina
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5403
Founded: Oct 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kargintina » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:37 pm

Yay! Make our armed forces even weaker!

User avatar
Altraxa
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Jul 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Altraxa » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:38 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Saiwania wrote:Well, it is just a fact that no women will never have as much upper body strength as a man of equivalent weight and size. This is merely reflecting this reality so as to make it sufficiently difficult but not nigh impossible for female recruits.

The average woman might not be able to do those easily but that doesn't mean that a fit woman couldn't. It's not like men are pushed to the absolute limit when they take the fitness test.


Yeah, that's kinda what I was hinting at. Men and women have more in common than they don't.

User avatar
Everia
Envoy
 
Posts: 334
Founded: May 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Everia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:39 pm

Davinhia wrote:Oh look, a weakening american army.

Marine Corps


Not the Army.

User avatar
The Sanguinian Islands
Minister
 
Posts: 2404
Founded: Jul 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sanguinian Islands » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:41 pm

>three pull ups

thats like fat kid's passing tier for high school fitness
russian winter: 0
me: 1

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:41 pm

Davinhia wrote:Oh look, a weakening american army.

Yeah the Marines make a habit of being weak.

User avatar
Krontzaika
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 45
Founded: Jun 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Krontzaika » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:41 pm

Make the USMC extremely hard for Women but a little softer for men (since the USMC is already extremely hard for the men)

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:43 pm

I love how atleast two posters have taken a dig at the quote with "sexism!1!!' when its quite obvious given the context that Robert is taking about average not individual cases.
There shouldn't be issue with women in armed forces, assuming they can pass same requirements as male recruits, this new policy is dangerous, sexist and plain wrong implemented just to make the charts look preety.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:43 pm

If you cannot do three pull ups, sorry but you shouldn't be in-combat.

Stop lowering the standards. They're not combat-ready. Stop trying to appease to pseudo-equality by enlisting more females, instead actually appease to reason and the person's physical and mental capabilities.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Cyptopir, Floofybit, General TN, Greater Carloso, Hurdergaryp, Likhinia, Repreteop, The Jamesian Republic, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads