For discussion and debate about anything.
-

Goath
- Diplomat
-
- Posts: 782
- Founded: Oct 25, 2009
- Scandinavian Liberal Paradise
by Goath » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:01 pm
In honor of two ballot issues today in the United States, I wondered where you folk stood on the issue of same-sex marriage. Because I get the sense many of the most common posters here are libertarians (at least economically) I wondered if your "leave me alone, government!" streak continued to letting gays tie the note.
Does calling the union "marriage" make you less likely to support it? To those of you who might be LGBT, do you think the unions must be called marriages to convey the same weight in society?
For those who don't know, today in the US the people of the State of Maine are being asked to support gay marriages, while the people of Washington are being asked to support a domestic partnership law that conveys the same rights and privileges of marriage but doesn't legally call them "marriages".
EDIT: if you're on either said- tell us why!
Last edited by
Goath on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.26
-

Dyakovo
- Negotiator
-
- Posts: 6736
- Founded: Nov 13, 2007
- Left-wing Utopia
by Dyakovo » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:02 pm
Yea
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Trve: I've never cared much for being 'manly'. If I want to fuck everything with an ass, that's what I choose to do. If you don't like it, sod off.
Fassitude: Well, duh. Since people want to fuck us, of course we get to fuck more.
OPPRESSION IS SYMBOLIC MEAT! STOP THE MURDER OF PLANTS GO CARNIVOREПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЕ! Я не тип парня, который подчиняется родительским наставлениям для детей до 13.
-

Neo Art
- Minister
-
- Posts: 2514
- Founded: Jan 09, 2007
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Neo Art » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:04 pm
equality in the law, first and foremost. Equality in name a lesser, but still important goal.
I PREFER universal marriage. I will "settle" for universal equality of rights.
Minnas: look at me I am always right and I know what I am saying. Boohoo, look at me. I am mean, I am Neo Art!
Ashmoria, on conservatives: it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
I regret to inform you that Michael Savage has not sued me.
-

Lunatic Goofballs
- Forum Moderator
-
- Posts: 5980
- Founded: Antiquity
- Civil Rights Lovefest
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:05 pm
On the basis of the two very safe assumptions that gay marriages won't become mandatory for everybody(I love my best friend like a brother but I'm not marrying the bastard) and religious institutions and their clergy will not be forced to marry couples their religion prohibits them from marrying(which nobody has ever suggested except for gay marriage opponents), I can't think of any valid reason why anyone would be against gender equality in marriage.
Last edited by
Lunatic Goofballs on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sometimes as I'm flying through space after a flying tackle that has propelled my best friend and me off a bridge over a stretch of dark chest-deep estuarial mud I take the time to wonder if there is more to life than mud, tacos, groin kicks, pies, theoretical physics, clowning, teaching my children all I know about mischief and personal self-destruction. Then shortly before we all but disappear in the black muck, I remember wedgies.
-

EvilDarkMagicians
- Minister
-
- Posts: 2853
- Founded: Jul 05, 2009
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:06 pm
America doesn't have same-sex marriage, yet?

Shebu wrote:History is written by winners. French History books are blank from cover to cover.
-

Goath
- Diplomat
-
- Posts: 782
- Founded: Oct 25, 2009
- Scandinavian Liberal Paradise
by Goath » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:06 pm
Neo Art wrote:equality in the law, first and foremost. Equality in name a lesser, but still important goal.
I PREFER universal marriage. I will "settle" for universal equality of rights.
that's always been my opinion, too. the rights conveyed are more important intrinsically than the name is.
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.26
-

Tezdrian
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 1487
- Founded: Jul 04, 2009
- Compulsory Consumerist State
by Tezdrian » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:07 pm
Yea!
-

Lunatic Goofballs
- Forum Moderator
-
- Posts: 5980
- Founded: Antiquity
- Civil Rights Lovefest
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:07 pm
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:America doesn't have same-sex marriage, yet?

Some parts do.
Sometimes as I'm flying through space after a flying tackle that has propelled my best friend and me off a bridge over a stretch of dark chest-deep estuarial mud I take the time to wonder if there is more to life than mud, tacos, groin kicks, pies, theoretical physics, clowning, teaching my children all I know about mischief and personal self-destruction. Then shortly before we all but disappear in the black muck, I remember wedgies.
-

EvilDarkMagicians
- Minister
-
- Posts: 2853
- Founded: Jul 05, 2009
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:08 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:EvilDarkMagicians wrote:America doesn't have same-sex marriage, yet?

Some parts do.
I suppose that's a start.....

Shebu wrote:History is written by winners. French History books are blank from cover to cover.
-

Farnhamia
- Senator
-
- Posts: 4170
- Founded: Jun 20, 2006
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:11 pm
Neo Art wrote:equality in the law, first and foremost. Equality in name a lesser, but still important goal.
I PREFER universal marriage. I will "settle" for universal equality of rights.
I agree with Neo here, but I am increasingly ... annoyed at the people who throw "civil unions" to us like a scrap from the table, it being understood that they have the "real" marriages while we have whatever they allow us to have. It makes me crazy. But to quote King Lear, "Let me not be mad. I must not be mad."
I have had a good many more uplifting thoughts, creative and expansive visions while soaking in comfortable baths or drying after bracing showers in well-equipped bathrooms than I have ever had in any cathedral. ~ Edmund Wilson
-

Farnhamia
- Senator
-
- Posts: 4170
- Founded: Jun 20, 2006
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:12 pm
The Aryan Third Reich wrote:Disgusting and revolting!!!!!!!
Why, pray tell?
I have had a good many more uplifting thoughts, creative and expansive visions while soaking in comfortable baths or drying after bracing showers in well-equipped bathrooms than I have ever had in any cathedral. ~ Edmund Wilson
-

Grave_n_idle
- Powerbroker
-
- Posts: 9085
- Founded: Feb 11, 2004
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Grave_n_idle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:13 pm
"Equal marriage" shouldn't even be a discussion we're still having.
The ONLY way in which it would be acceptable for the US to have laws that discriminate on which person can marry which person, is if we ALL just woke up from a centuries long daze and said "Jesus! We don't actually let people marry each other, because of something like sexual orientation? We better fix that quick-sharp".
I'm pretty sure we didn't all just wake up, though - so there's no excuse.
I quit.
Anyone who needs to contact me, I'll check TG's every so often.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-

Grave_n_idle
- Powerbroker
-
- Posts: 9085
- Founded: Feb 11, 2004
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Grave_n_idle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:14 pm
The Aryan Third Reich wrote:Disgusting and revolting!!!!!!!
The "Aryan Third Reich" things marriage equality is disgusting and revolting? Ooh, that's a blow.
I quit.
Anyone who needs to contact me, I'll check TG's every so often.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-

EvilDarkMagicians
- Minister
-
- Posts: 2853
- Founded: Jul 05, 2009
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:14 pm
The Aryan Third Reich wrote:Disgusting and revolting!!!!!!!
Why?
Shebu wrote:History is written by winners. French History books are blank from cover to cover.
-

Flameswroth
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 1044
- Founded: Sep 05, 2008
- Father Knows Best State
by Flameswroth » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:15 pm
inb4 sarcastic comment referencing the frequency with which this topic is discussed on NSG.
Based on a similar line of thought to my opposition of marijuana legalization, I also oppose gay marriage. This is not a strong opposition, as I realize they will not be forcing me to marry a dude and be gay, and as such if it is legalized I shan't be marching in the streets in protest. But if you put a paper in front of me asking to vote yes or no, I would vote no.
I'm not racist; I watch the A-Team every Sunday!
-

Farnhamia
- Senator
-
- Posts: 4170
- Founded: Jun 20, 2006
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:16 pm
Flameswroth wrote:inb4 sarcastic comment referencing the frequency with which this topic is discussed on NSG.
Based on a similar line of thought to my opposition of marijuana legalization, I also oppose gay marriage. This is not a strong opposition, as I realize they will not be forcing me to marry a dude and be gay, and as such if it is legalized I shan't be marching in the streets in protest. But if you put a paper in front of me asking to vote yes or no, I would vote no.
I've forgotten why you feel that way. I'm sure you've said it but it has been a while since we've had one of these threads.
I have had a good many more uplifting thoughts, creative and expansive visions while soaking in comfortable baths or drying after bracing showers in well-equipped bathrooms than I have ever had in any cathedral. ~ Edmund Wilson
-

Grave_n_idle
- Powerbroker
-
- Posts: 9085
- Founded: Feb 11, 2004
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by Grave_n_idle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:16 pm
Flameswroth wrote:inb4 sarcastic comment referencing the frequency with which this topic is discussed on NSG.
Based on a similar line of thought to my opposition of marijuana legalization, I also oppose gay marriage. This is not a strong opposition, as I realize they will not be forcing me to marry a dude and be gay, and as such if it is legalized I shan't be marching in the streets in protest. But if you put a paper in front of me asking to vote yes or no, I would vote no.
So - you don't have
strong reasons to deny people equality, but you'll do it anyway?
I quit.
Anyone who needs to contact me, I'll check TG's every so often.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-

Lunatic Goofballs
- Forum Moderator
-
- Posts: 5980
- Founded: Antiquity
- Civil Rights Lovefest
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:16 pm
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:EvilDarkMagicians wrote:America doesn't have same-sex marriage, yet?

Some parts do.
I suppose that's a start.....

An important start because of the way the Constitution is written. Individual rights aren't a state-by-state thing. They haven't been for almost 150 years. Individual rights are all or nothing. But unfortunately,striking down or repealing unconstitutional laws is often a much longer process than making them.
Last edited by
Lunatic Goofballs on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sometimes as I'm flying through space after a flying tackle that has propelled my best friend and me off a bridge over a stretch of dark chest-deep estuarial mud I take the time to wonder if there is more to life than mud, tacos, groin kicks, pies, theoretical physics, clowning, teaching my children all I know about mischief and personal self-destruction. Then shortly before we all but disappear in the black muck, I remember wedgies.
-

Bottle
- Ambassador
-
- Posts: 1626
- Founded: Dec 30, 2008
- Left-Leaning College State
by Bottle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:17 pm
I would love to see "marriage" removed from the legal realm entirely. I'd like to be able to have a legal civil union with my hetero life mate, without having to use the term "marriage" to describe our union. I don't like marriage or much of what it stands for, and I'd rather not dirty my relationship with that term.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
-

Zeppy
- Diplomat
-
- Posts: 772
- Founded: Oct 30, 2008
- Anarchy
by Zeppy » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:17 pm
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:America doesn't have same-sex marriage, yet?

Neither does your country. (UK I believe?)
Field Marshmallow of the Pantheon Zeppy, 1st Duke of Jack Daniels and Purples NurplesK-k-k-kick itEconomic Left/
Right: 4.50
Social
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.15
-

Goath
- Diplomat
-
- Posts: 782
- Founded: Oct 25, 2009
- Scandinavian Liberal Paradise
by Goath » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:18 pm
Flameswroth wrote:inb4 sarcastic comment referencing the frequency with which this topic is discussed on NSG.
Based on a similar line of thought to my opposition of marijuana legalization, I also oppose gay marriage. This is not a strong opposition, as I realize they will not be forcing me to marry a dude and be gay, and as such if it is legalized I shan't be marching in the streets in protest. But if you put a paper in front of me asking to vote yes or no, I would vote no.
Why?
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.26
-

Zeppy
- Diplomat
-
- Posts: 772
- Founded: Oct 30, 2008
- Anarchy
by Zeppy » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:18 pm
Chea.
Field Marshmallow of the Pantheon Zeppy, 1st Duke of Jack Daniels and Purples NurplesK-k-k-kick itEconomic Left/
Right: 4.50
Social
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.15
-

EvilDarkMagicians
- Minister
-
- Posts: 2853
- Founded: Jul 05, 2009
- Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:21 pm
Zeppy wrote:EvilDarkMagicians wrote:America doesn't have same-sex marriage, yet?

Neither does your country. (UK I believe?)
Yes it does.
Civil Partnerships = Marriage

Shebu wrote:History is written by winners. French History books are blank from cover to cover.
-

Charlotte Ryberg
- The Muse of the Westcountry
-
- Posts: 2099
- Founded: Mar 14, 2007
- Anarchy
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:21 pm
I have nothing against same sex marriages or civil partnerships. In fact, gender equality is the key to achieving good human rights records. Respect should be given to them.
Return to General
Users browsing this forum: Alfegos, Ardchoille, Ask Jeeves [Bot], Bastoka, Bazalonia, Bikonria, Brajh, Call to power, CanuckHeaven, Cironia, Civil Mania, Concordeia, Conservative Alliances, Drakonaj, Dumb Ideologies, Esselldee, EvilDarkMagicians, Flammable Ice, FreeSatania, Gauthier, Great MikeJake, Griffery, Hairless Kitten II, Hitchensland, Hydesland, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Jipleastan, Jocabia, Jordaxia, JuNii, Kaesekartoffeln, Keferum, Kryozerkia, Lazorfist, Licentia pro rus ruris, Maurepas, Maya Power, Melkislov, MisterBellyButtonMan, Muravyets, New Heliopolis, New Imperial Clans, New Orrell, Nova Magna Germania, Pevisopolis, Rikker DAnconia, Rithian, SD_Film Artists, Sebastianalandia, Senestrum, Skypi, Smunkeeville, Sumamba Buwhan, Tekania, The Norse Hordes, The Tofu Islands, UNIverseVERSE, Urzamalandi, Wutaco, Xochipill, Yahoo [Bot], Zeppy