NATION

PASSWORD

The Mod-Sanctioned Israel/Palestine thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

The Mod-Sanctioned Israel/Palestine thread

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:15 am

This is the new mod-sanctioned Israel/Palestine thread designed for discussion of:

A) The Middle East Peace Process

B) Israeli politics, particularly regarding their impact on the Middle East Peace Process.

C) Palestinian politics, particularly regarding their impact on the Middle East Peace Process.

D) Discussion relating to other countries where their politics might impact on the Middle East Peace Process.

The Moderation team have been concerned at the extent to which recent threads on this subject have tended to turn into one great big troll/flamebait fest faster than you say either "shalom" or "salam". It's our hope that by starting a mod-sanctioned thread we can slow this tendency down (even if we can't entirely stop it), and encourage a more civil debate between different political perspectives.

We will treat this thread with similar stringent conditions to those we use for US Presidential election threads:

In addition to the usual rules regarding no flaming, no baiting, and no trolling, we we also rigidly enforce no mocking nicknames, and no gloating.

There are three other rulings specific to this thread:

1) Referring to Palestinians, other Arabs, Jews, Africans (particularly, but not exclusively, the Beta Israel of Ethiopia), or any other ethnic/racial group as "stupid", "inferior", "retarded", or "subhuman" will - in most cases - bring us down on you like a ton of bricks.

2) In keeping with an earlier ruling (linky), referring to anyone as a "Jewish Nazi" without any further discussion will be treated as trolling. Quoting the earlier ruling, "Writing posts detailing alleged similarities between a Jewish individual's politics and National Socialist politics is permissable; likewise characterising someone's views as racist and/or supremacist. We are not trying to shut down debate. But one-sentence posts dismissing Jewish posters as "Jewish Nazis" without any further point of discussion are trolling/flamebaiting."

3) As with "Jewish Nazi", so with "self-hating Jew" - one-sentence posts dismissing Jewish posters as a "self-hating Jew" without any further point of discussion are trolling/flamebaiting


CLAIMS SHOULD BE SOURCED. But specifically note the following.... Wikipedia is an acceptable source; as are major media outlets, regardless of their perceived bias or lack thereof. For example, both the Guardian (UK) and the Jerusalem Post (Israel) are considered acceptable sources, despite the left of centre orientation of the former, and the right of centre orientation of the latter. Noting that a major media outlet has a particular orientation is valid; squabbling over whether a particular source is valid or not simply on the basis of its political orientation is strongly discouraged. Disagreeing with Wiki or a major media outlet is absolutely fine, but counterclaims should also be sourced. "Something my Rabbi/Imam/cousin told me after synagogue/Friday prayers" can still be brought up as an anecdote, provided it's clearly signalled as an anecdote rather than as a proper source.

If we find that people are exploiting loopholes in the above rulings, or coming up with new ways of insulting each other that are specific to this topic, we reserve the right to edit this OP to address these accordingly.

We encourage you to be polite to each other. We appreciate that this is a topic over which people have strong feelings - but this is no excuse to be rude.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And with moderation out of the way, here's your starting point of discussion:


With Obama's visit to Israel possibly coinciding with the official announcement of the form of the new post-election Israeli government, will either the US President's visit or the form of the new government make any material difference to the Middle East peace process? If not, why not?
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
ThisIsNotToronina
Envoy
 
Posts: 205
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby ThisIsNotToronina » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:16 am

ThisIsNotToronina wrote:FIRST!

Also, I support Palestine
http://www.facebook.com/#!/andrew.parker.1612Here is my facebook, don't message me if you don't wana be my friend
The Zeonic States wrote:
Bojikami wrote:Again, the US making a crap decision. I understand the losses that would be sustained from a land invasion, but what is better? Thousands of people dying who signed up to die for their country, or thousands of innocents?


Some times a thousand people must die so a million can live.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:19 am

ThisIsNotToronina wrote:FIRST!


Let me clarify that spam is also still very much against the rules.

Try not to do that again.

Let's also hope that the thread gets off to a rather more encouraging start after this....
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:21 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:24 am

What does everyone think of a quota govt, ala Lebanon, with Jerusalem under International Jurisdiction. In my time studying the conflict I can't find a reason this would fail (at least as a long term temporary solution) because it addresses the main concerns of both parties. On the other hand I do realize that the solution to this problem must come from and be agreed upon by the Israelis and the Palestinians...so all of this is just in theory. Obviously this is a single state solution.

I don't have hard numbers, I need to do much more specific and extensive research for that.
Last edited by Disserbia on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:25 am

I'll get something rolling. First off, I support Palestine. I grow increasingly weary of the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israelis. I have a deep hatred for Zionists. An example of behavior that is in my opinion unacceptable is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=glVVcDhHt2E.
Last edited by Soviet Ruk-Tsan on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:26 am

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:I'll get something rolling then. First off, I support Palestine. I grow increasingly weary of the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israelis. I have a deep hatred for Zionists. An example of behavior that is in my opinion unacceptable is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=glVVcDhHt2E.

When you say zionists, do you mean people that think that the Israeli state should exist? I don't see why anyone can't be both pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Yorkopolis
Minister
 
Posts: 2024
Founded: Jul 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Yorkopolis » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:34 am

Disserbia wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:I'll get something rolling then. First off, I support Palestine. I grow increasingly weary of the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israelis. I have a deep hatred for Zionists. An example of behavior that is in my opinion unacceptable is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=glVVcDhHt2E.

When you say zionists, do you mean people that think that the Israeli state should exist? I don't see why anyone can't be both pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel.

Well, a reason people wouldn't be both (especially Zionists) is because Zionists believe that all of Palestine is basically Israel, a land that is, so to say, "reserved" for the Jewish people. Therefore, some of the more radical Zionists around, as well as Revisionist Zionists, do believe that Palestine has no right to exist and that Arabs/Palestinians are, to put it, "Untermenschen". It's one of the main reasons why I'm anti-Zionists. If they weren't as horribly racist as they are, I may have even considered seeing Israel as a legitimate state an option, but I don't at this moment.
Last edited by Yorkopolis on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Libertarian socialist, confederalist, and Dutch republican.
Economic Left/Right: -9.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.69
Political Spectrum:
Left: 7.67
Libertarian: 2.63
Foreign Non-Interventionist: -6.76
Cultural Liberal: -6.63



I like: Guild socialism, Republicanism, Environmentalism, Trade unions, Egalitarianism, LGBT Rights, Direct democracy, Decentralization.
I dislike: Libertarianism, capitalism, racism, Hitlerism, Stalinism, monarchism, neoliberalism, white nationalism, laissez-faire, Fascism, totalitarianism.

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:36 am

Disserbia wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:I'll get something rolling then. First off, I support Palestine. I grow increasingly weary of the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israelis. I have a deep hatred for Zionists. An example of behavior that is in my opinion unacceptable is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=glVVcDhHt2E.

When you say zionists, do you mean people that think that the Israeli state should exist? I don't see why anyone can't be both pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel.

Well, not really Zionists. I mean the really right-wing, Israeli supporting, human decency-violating pieces of crap that keep cropping up. The reason someone can't be both, in my opinion at least, is that Palestinians want their home, their freedom back, they want their nation back. Israel only exists because of land that used to belong to Palestine. Also, both sides have done some pretty serious things to each other, so there is a bit of a grudge.
Last edited by Soviet Ruk-Tsan on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:40 am

Yorkopolis wrote:
Disserbia wrote:When you say zionists, do you mean people that think that the Israeli state should exist? I don't see why anyone can't be both pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel.

Well, a reason people wouldn't be both (especially Zionists) is because Zionists believe that all of Palestine is basically Israel, a land that is, so to say, "reserved" for the Jewish people. Therefore, some of the more radical Zionists around, as well as Revisionist Zionists, do believe that Palestine has no right to exist and that Arabs/Palestinians are, to put it, "Untermenschen". It's one of the main reasons why I'm anti-Zionists. If they weren't as horribly racist as they are, I may have even considered seeing Israel as a legitimate state an option, but I don't at this moment.

That is a horrible false stereotype of zionists, and that is your problem, not Israel's or Palestine's. Israel has the right to exist, if not because the land was bought legitimately from Arab landlords, if not because Jews and Palestinians did get alone for some time there, if not because it existed de facto since the early 20th century if not because the UN and almost every member state officially recognized it, if not all that, it is a legitimate state because all people living there have the same rights as human beings, not just one group or the other and because most reasonable Palestinians concede it's right to exist.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:44 am

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:
Disserbia wrote:When you say zionists, do you mean people that think that the Israeli state should exist? I don't see why anyone can't be both pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel.

Well, not really Zionists. I mean the really right-wing, Israeli supporting, human decency-violating pieces of crap that keep cropping up. The reason someone can't be both, in my opinion at least, is that Palestinians want their home, their freedom back, they want their nation back. Israel only exists because of land that used to belong to Palestine. Also, both sides have done some pretty serious things to each other, so there is a bit of a grudge.

The land used to belong to "Palestine". Not really. I support Israel, I also support Palestinians being treated like human beings. Palestinians do want their home, they've also said they'd be okay going back to 1967 borders, which is more favorable towards Israel than the UN's original resolution in 1948.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:45 am

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote: I mean the really right-wing, Israeli supporting, human decency-violating pieces of crap.


This is precisely the sort of language that we're trying to avoid in this brave new world of mod-sanctioned threads on the subject.

Remember: Let's be polite, and let's try and tone down the rhetoric.

Thank you.

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:51 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote: I mean the really right-wing, Israeli supporting, human decency-violating pieces of crap.


This is precisely the sort of language that we're trying to avoid in this brave new world of mod-sanctioned threads on the subject.

Remember: Let's be polite, and let's try and tone down the rhetoric.

Thank you.

My apologies. I will attempt to avoid such language in future.


Disserbia wrote:
Yorkopolis wrote:Well, a reason people wouldn't be both (especially Zionists) is because Zionists believe that all of Palestine is basically Israel, a land that is, so to say, "reserved" for the Jewish people. Therefore, some of the more radical Zionists around, as well as Revisionist Zionists, do believe that Palestine has no right to exist and that Arabs/Palestinians are, to put it, "Untermenschen". It's one of the main reasons why I'm anti-Zionists. If they weren't as horribly racist as they are, I may have even considered seeing Israel as a legitimate state an option, but I don't at this moment.

That is a horrible false stereotype of zionists, and that is your problem, not Israel's or Palestine's. Israel has the right to exist, if not because the land was bought legitimately from Arab landlords, if not because Jews and Palestinians did get alone for some time there, if not because it existed de facto since the early 20th century if not because the UN and almost every member state officially recognized it, if not all that, it is a legitimate state because all people living there have the same rights as human beings, not just one group or the other and because most reasonable Palestinians concede it's right to exist.

1: Landlords don't always represent the people living on the land, and as far as I'm aware, do not represent a national government, which should be the body giving away land.
2: When the UN held the vote for having Palestine, a Jewish community, and Jerusalem as their own things, the Jews and most of the UN agreed, but the Arab League and Arab Higher Committee of Palestine rejected it. (understandably, they were being forced to give up half their nation and their capital for a people they had done nothing to.)
3: Even after the "even split" of Palestine and Israel took place, that didn't last long. Here's an interesting image for you.
Image
Last edited by Soviet Ruk-Tsan on Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:58 am

We all know how the conflict will end. Eventually, Israel and Palestine will both go back to borders based upon the pre-1967 boundaries while Jerusalem will become an independent state a la Vatican City.

Anything else at this point is simply prolonging the inevitable.
Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:04 am

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
This is precisely the sort of language that we're trying to avoid in this brave new world of mod-sanctioned threads on the subject.

Remember: Let's be polite, and let's try and tone down the rhetoric.

Thank you.

My apologies. I will attempt to avoid such language in future.


Disserbia wrote:That is a horrible false stereotype of zionists, and that is your problem, not Israel's or Palestine's. Israel has the right to exist, if not because the land was bought legitimately from Arab landlords, if not because Jews and Palestinians did get alone for some time there, if not because it existed de facto since the early 20th century if not because the UN and almost every member state officially recognized it, if not all that, it is a legitimate state because all people living there have the same rights as human beings, not just one group or the other and because most reasonable Palestinians concede it's right to exist.

1: Landlords don't always represent the people living on the land, and as far as I'm aware, do not represent a national government, which should be the body giving away land.
2: When the UN held the vote for having Palestine, a Jewish community, and Jerusalem as their own things, the Jews and most of the UN agreed, but the Arab League and Arab Higher Committee of Palestine rejected it. (understandably, they were being forced to give up half their nation and their capital for a people they had done nothing to.)
3: Even after the "even split" of Palestine and Israel took place, that didn't last long. Here's an interesting image for you.
Image

I was in SJP so don't get confused, okay? It doesn't matter if landlords did not represent the views of people living on the land, because they owned it and it was brought from them legally, and while this may be unfortunate, that is all it legally is. #2, so it was rejected, and that's a shame, but that doesn't diminish in any way Israel's right to exist. #3, I never claimed it was even, so you can throw that out and try to argue objectively from now on. I am aware of the map and NONE OF THIS CONTRADICTS ISRAEL'S RIGHT TO EXIST. You don't solve ethnic cleansing with ethnic cleansing.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:07 am

Arch - also suggest that you add in there that criticism of Israel and Israeli's is not anti-Semitic.

Thank you.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:10 am

Well, I would rather think that the people of the land not wanting them, and the government not wanting them would pretty much mean they shouldn't be there.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:13 am

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Well, I would rather think that the people of the land not wanting them, and the government not wanting them would pretty much mean they shouldn't be there.

Please don't make me Godwin this early in the thread.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:17 am

Disserbia wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Well, I would rather think that the people of the land not wanting them, and the government not wanting them would pretty much mean they shouldn't be there.

Please don't make me Godwin this early in the thread.

I'm just saying, Palestine was the lawful owner of the land, they shouldn't have had to cede over half of their nation to a group they had nothing to do with.
Last edited by Soviet Ruk-Tsan on Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:18 am

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Please don't make me Godwin this early in the thread.

Palestine was the lawful owner of the land

No, not really.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:19 am

Disserbia wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Palestine was the lawful owner of the land

No, not really.

Britain was the lawful owner of the land. Therefore, we must reconstitute the British Empire.

Watch your back, Kenya.
Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:21 am

Wamitoria wrote:
Disserbia wrote:No, not really.

Britain was the lawful owner of the land. Therefore, we must reconstitute the British Empire.

That's not really quite true either. Britain claimed to have legitimate ownership of the land which they used to confuse the hell out of everyone and create this mess in the first place in exchange for military are financial support during ww1.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:22 am

Disserbia wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Britain was the lawful owner of the land. Therefore, we must reconstitute the British Empire.

That's not really quite true either. Britain claimed to have legitimate ownership of the land which they used to confuse the hell out of everyone and create this mess in the first place in exchange for military are financial support during ww1.

My point is that arguing over who the land used to belong to is pointless. It's much more productive to focus on the present when dealing with a situation like this.
Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:23 am

Disserbia wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Britain was the lawful owner of the land. Therefore, we must reconstitute the British Empire.

That's not really quite true either. Britain claimed to have legitimate ownership of the land which they used to confuse the hell out of everyone and create this mess in the first place in exchange for military are financial support during ww1.

Now hold on, are you saying that Palestine, in the British Empire, lawfully belonged to the Jews? Just because they lived there thousands of years ago doesn't mean they can stroll in and have the land again.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

User avatar
Beloyukto
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 61
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Beloyukto » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:24 am

It just doesn't make sense to bring every Jew form far and wide and put them in Palestine then make a state for them and flood it with arms and money, then veto every single UN resolution to stop it from arresting Palestinians, occupying others' land, and sending an airstrike here and there once every while. IMHO, no peace negotiations will ever succeed in the PAL/ISR conflict because, well... What was taken by force, will be returned by force.

Don't tell me it's their own land. Arabs lived there 8000 years ago, and it was Arabs who built the city of Jerusalem.
Last edited by Beloyukto on Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soviet Ruk-Tsan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1994
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Ruk-Tsan » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:26 am

Beloyukto wrote:It just doesn't make sense to bring every Jew form far and wide and put them in Palestine then make a state for them and flood it with arms and money, then veto every single UN resolution to stop it from arresting Palestinians, occupying others' land, and sending an airstrike here once every while. IMHO, no peace negotiations will ever succeed in the PAL/ISR conflict because, well... What was taken by force, will be returned by force.

Don't tell me it's their own land. Arabs lived there 8000 years ago, and it was Arabs who built the city of Jerusalem.

You put it in better words than I could. I whole-heartedly agree.
Founder of The Union of Red Nations

Soviet Ruk-Tsan, bringing peace to the world through senseless violence.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ineva, Likhinia, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads