Rate the Flag above you II

by **Zaze** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:49 am

Because the last one was locked.

by **Iglesian Archipelago** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:51 am

8/10. The design is good.

by **Zaze** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:56 am

7/10 good design but I'm not too keen on white backgrounds

by **Bastionian Republics** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:33 am

9.8/10
One of the best ones I've seen so far, kudos to you :clap:

by **Ilke Solakoglu** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:48 am

7/10, the low quality ruins it.

by **Schkottland** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:51 am

2/10 a bit stupid

by **RAHIT RA** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:53 am

Pretty nice, solid design but seems just a copy + paste jobbie 6.5/10

by **Rasoana** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:54 am

The lion is way overdone, along with dragons and eagles. 2/10
To:Schkottland

by **Swilatia** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:57 am

Poorly constructed and compressed soviet flag rip-off with writing on it.

0/10

by **Inchland** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:58 am

I like the colours in the middle 8/10

by **Rasoana** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:00 am

It's ceiling cat! Yay for ceiling cat! 100000000/1

by **Sypaill** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:04 am

hammer and tickle always effect me.
a good kind of red.
6/10

by **Blu Avalon** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:05 am

I like the design, blue and white go well together

8/10

by **Ilke Solakoglu** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:06 am

8/10

Simple and symmetrical.

by **Rasoana** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:06 am

Sypaill wrote:hammer and tickle always effect me.
a good kind of red.
6/10

I do like the hammer and TICKLE myself. lol.

2.5/10 Stars are overdone, and I don't like that shade of blue.

by **The chrisman union** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:06 am

9/10 Very nicely constructed, symetrical. Reminds of Sweden, for some reason.

by **Blu Avalon** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:07 am

The chrisman union wrote:9/10 Very nicely constructed, symetrical. Reminds of Sweden, for some reason.

that's what I was thinking too

by **Hodori** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:08 am

7/10
Nice and simple.

by **The chrisman union** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:11 am

Gah, I'm always skipped.

7/10 Nice colours, what does the writing at the top mean?

by **RAHIT RA** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:11 am

missed me ; ;

by **The chrisman union** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:13 am

GAH! Twice in a row!

6/10, while the black and red goes together well, there should be more design to it, rather than just a triangle.

by **Zarcanodia** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:14 am

RAHIT RA wrote:missed me ; ;

Nice colours and design 8.5/10

by **The chrisman union** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:16 am

Double GAH! Three times!

6/10, background is a bit dark and the spraycanned name doesn't look great.

by **Zarcanodia** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:18 am

The chrisman union wrote:Double GAH! Three times!

6/10, background is a bit dark and the spraycanned name doesn't look great.

Ha, it's not meant to look great! It's meant to look silly and wierd...

by **Revolvisia** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:34 am

Zarcanodia wrote:
The chrisman union wrote:Double GAH! Three times!

6/10, background is a bit dark and the spraycanned name doesn't look great.

Ha, it's not meant to look great! It's meant to look silly and wierd...

And in that respect it succeeds. I can't see it as a flag though so a fairly low score. 4/10