NATION

PASSWORD

Are Feminists Sexist?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Goony Goo Goo
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Sep 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Are Feminists Sexist?

Postby Goony Goo Goo » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:00 pm

I googled the word "Feminism" and learned that it is a term coined in 1895 which was intended to describe...

1: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes

2: organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests

However if you read history you will find that there have been many queens and women of high status in almost every society. Are we then to believe that being an Empress in ancient China meant you were less equal to a male slave?

Shouldn't feminists, if they truly want to exist in a just and equal society, acknowledge that women are not the only people who have been abused in the name of civilization? 8)

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10260
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Khadgar » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:01 pm

Goony Goo Goo wrote:I googled the word "Feminism" and learned that it is a term coined in 1895 which was intended to describe...

1: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes

2: organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests

However if you read history you will find that there have been many queens and women of high status in almost every society. Are we then to believe that being an Empress in ancient China meant you were less equal to a male slave?

Shouldn't feminists, if they truly want to exist in a just and equal society, acknowledge that women are not the only people who have been abused in the name of civilization? 8)


Uh, I think you're ignoring the first definition and forming a completely ignorant hypothesis.
Racism tends to attract attention when it's flagrant and filled with invective. But like all bigotry, the most potent component of racism is frame-flipping -- positioning the bigot as the actual victim. So the gay do not simply want to marry; they want to convert our children into sin. The Jews do not merely want to be left in peace; they actually are plotting world take-over. And the blacks are not actually victims of American power, but beneficiaries of the war against hard-working whites. This is a respectable, more sensible, bigotry, one that does not seek to name-call, preferring instead change the subject and straw man. Thus segregation wasn't necessary to keep the niggers in line; it was necessary to protect the honor of white women.
—Ta-Nehisi Coates

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:02 pm

Goony Goo Goo wrote:
Shouldn't feminists, if they truly want to exist in a just and equal society, acknowledge that women are not the only people who have been abused in the name of civilization? 8)

Many do. Have you talked to any?

User avatar
Zijeme
Diplomat
 
Posts: 763
Founded: Nov 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zijeme » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:06 pm

lol, nah.
The vandal shot his paint straight at the cow in the form of words like "twat", and later "fucknut" and "arsecandle".

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:08 pm

Some are.
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:09 pm

I would advise further investigation before saying things of this sort. You don't look ready for this debate.

User avatar
Anollasia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23791
Founded: Apr 05, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Anollasia » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Some, are, because they actually want women to be more superior than men.
But, some just want both genders to be equal.
I would like it if it's equal.
You can call me Anoll.

Feel free to telegram me.
''Hi.''

- Me
Male, Turkish-Canadian citizen, student
News: Debate over whether Jefferton should remain capital|Anollasia's first nuclear power station being built outside of Easton|Protesters demand Assistant PM Bartlett to resign

User avatar
Seskany
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 114
Founded: Sep 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seskany » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Feminism (At least, the proper kind) is about equal rights for the sexes. So, no. "Feminists," however, are just bigots with different prejudices then the mainstream terrible people. Note my clever use of quotation marks, there. Fortunately, quotation-mark-feminists are few, and far between. Unless you're on the internet, I mean.
Generation Glass. (The first time you see this, replace your generation with a randomly generated noun. Counter-social experiment.)
My new jam~

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Men suffer just as much from patriarchy as women do.

And while the feminist movement has destroyed, or greatly reduced, the effects of patriarchy on women, they have thus far left men still under it's problems.
So I'd say the founding feminists, and most feminists up until very recently, were either sexists or incredibly absorbed with THEIR problems as opposed to societies.
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:15 pm

You can tell the sexist history of the term feminism by it's eytmology.

It seems to imply that women are being kept under the heel of patriarchy and need to be raised up to the male level.
This isn't the case at all.
Women weren't given less rights and duties than men. they were given DIFFERENT ones.

The effects of patriarchy effect both, and by labeling the movement feminism, an emphasis is placed on the women's rights issues.

The term feminist is sexist.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:16 pm, edited 3 times in total.
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:16 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:Men suffer just as much from patriarchy as women do.

And while the feminist movement has destroyed, or greatly reduced, the effects of patriarchy on women, they have thus far left men still under it's problems.
So I'd say the founding feminists, and most feminists up until very recently, were either sexists or incredibly absorbed with THEIR problems as opposed to societies.


Failure to be a 'One Nation' Movement ( sly dig at Milliband ) equates unfit to exist in democratic societies.

Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.
JFK.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20966
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby SaintB » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:16 pm

Some may be, most are about equality though. You'll find bigots in any group sadly.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

I support Skeletor for President in 2016! At least then the bumbling villain we elect will look cool!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:18 pm

Norsklow wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Men suffer just as much from patriarchy as women do.

And while the feminist movement has destroyed, or greatly reduced, the effects of patriarchy on women, they have thus far left men still under it's problems.
So I'd say the founding feminists, and most feminists up until very recently, were either sexists or incredibly absorbed with THEIR problems as opposed to societies.


Failure to be a 'One Nation' Movement ( sly dig at Milliband ) equates unfit to exist in democratic societies.

Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.
JFK.



Imagine if around the same time there were a movement called
Masculinism.
And it was opposed to men being the only sex effected by the draft, the emphasis on "Women and children first", the expendability of the male gender in societal values, the repression of gays while lesbians were (relatively) tolerated, "Men can be nurses too!" etc.

Now imagine if this movement had a lot of members in it who regarded women complaining about the right to vote as "inconsequential"
"Overblowing the issue."
"Whining" etc.
"Being unwomanly."

The reason women didn't have the right to vote and had different rights to men comes very much from the expendability and martial nature of men's role in society.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:23 pm, edited 4 times in total.
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

User avatar
Seskany
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 114
Founded: Sep 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seskany » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:20 pm

Okay guys, let's just make skirts unisex and call it a day
Generation Glass. (The first time you see this, replace your generation with a randomly generated noun. Counter-social experiment.)
My new jam~

User avatar
San Leggera
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13414
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San Leggera » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:21 pm

No. The aren't sexist.
They simply want gender equality between men and women.
#JusticeForGat
Flag | CoA | Map (bigger!)
I Just Want to Sell Out My Funeral

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:22 pm

San Leggera wrote:No. The aren't sexist.
They simply want gender equality between men and women.


Some do. A lot don't realize the actual problem. Check my posts.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10827
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:22 pm

I keep getting the feeling that this is BBQ.
Member of laissez-fair right-wing worker-mistreatment brigade
Why Britannians are always late
_/人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\_
Mainland Map | No one can tell you're a mouse on the internet | Britannia...
Talent, Honour, Discipline, and pretty pictures!
Bluvil wrote:Britain, if when designing the flag the aim was "Fuck Scotland, they'll get a bit of blue on the background and they'll like it, or else..."
Grand Europa wrote:Lets take the rest of the America's while we're at it. The United States has power, and with power comes ambition.
Relevant

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10323
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:24 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:I keep getting the feeling that this is BBQ.

...then take it to Moderation and have the Mods/Admins check.
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
San Leggera
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13414
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San Leggera » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:24 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
San Leggera wrote:No. The aren't sexist.
They simply want gender equality between men and women.


Some do. A lot don't realize the actual problem. Check my posts.

I was under the assumption that the OP was referring to feminists as a group rather than individuals.
Of course there are sexist people in the world, however feminism is not sexist; at least not on its own.
#JusticeForGat
Flag | CoA | Map (bigger!)
I Just Want to Sell Out My Funeral

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:24 pm

San Leggera wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Some do. A lot don't realize the actual problem. Check my posts.

I was under the assumption that the OP was referring to feminists as a group rather than individuals.
Of course there are sexist people in the world, however feminism is not sexist; at least not on its own.


The term is sexist.
And the implications of using THAT term to describe THOSE goals is sexist.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:25 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Norsklow wrote:
Failure to be a 'One Nation' Movement ( sly dig at Milliband ) equates unfit to exist in democratic societies.

Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.
JFK.



Imagine if around the same time there were a movement called
Masculinism.
And it was opposed to men being the only sex effected by the draft, the emphasis on "Women and children first", the expendability of the male gender in societal values, the repression of gays while lesbians were (relatively) tolerated, "Men can be nurses too!" etc.

Now imagine if this movement had a lot of members in it who regarded women complaining about the right to vote as "inconsequential"
"Overblowing the issue."
"Whining" etc.


The reason women didn't have the right to vote and had different rights to men comes very much from the expendability and martial nature of men's role in society.


Obviously, likewise, to be banned, suppressed, and its members penalised at every turn.
EDL,Feminism, the Socialist Worker bunch, whatever. If it does totally describe to the concept of the Nation Indivisible, excise the cancer.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Camicon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10192
Founded: Aug 26, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Camicon » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:25 pm

Feminism is inherently sexist. Not to say it hasn't (and isn't) doing some great things as to improving conditions for women. It is flawed from the outset, and thus never able to truly achieve it's goal (that is, equality), by favouring the social development of women over that of men.

Equality by improving social conditions for women and men should be our modus operandi.
Active since May, 2009.
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10323
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:26 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
San Leggera wrote:No. The aren't sexist.
They simply want gender equality between men and women.


Some do. A lot don't realize the actual problem. Check my posts.

Er, wait... what's the "actual problem"?
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Ashlak
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Oct 29, 2008
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Ashlak » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:26 pm

Seeing as how Feminism is about equal rights, a woman who claims to be a feminist but is sexist against men would not be a feminist, but a misandrist.

Besides, it's incredibly difficult to make broad strokes about feminism like that. Feminism is incredibly fractured. You have sex-positive feminists and sex-negative feminists, you have the radical feminists who are transphobic, then there is Trans-feminism...

There are generally three "waves" of feminism.

1st wave: Women's suffrage movement. Susan B. Anthony and all that.

2nd wave: Characterized as the "Women's Lib" movement. What people think of when they think of Feminism, somewhat unfortunately. Did a lot of good, but was flawed, due to it's focus on white women to the exclusion of minority women, it's transphobia, and general sex-negativity. Despite claims to the contrary, not misandrist, but debates were had over the involvement of men. The only misandrist to get big in the movement was Andrea Dworkin.

3rd Wave: The present wave. Is generally much more sex positive, accepting of trans folk, and pays more attention to the issues of minority women. Is criticized by the second wave for not really having a goal. I consider myself to be a "Third wave" feminist. Encourages the involvement of men.
Last edited by Ashlak on Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am a girl of the transgender variety
Liberal
Humanist
Disaffected Bernie supporter protest voting for Jill Stein

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36677
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:26 pm

Camicon wrote:Feminism is inherently sexist. Not to say it hasn't (and isn't) doing some great things as to improving conditions for women. It is flawed from the outset, and thus never able to truly achieve it's goal (that is, equality), by favouring the social development of women over that of men.

Equality by improving social conditions for women and men should be our modus operandi.


Essentially this.
Because the term places emphasis on women
OPEN BORDERS FOR ISRAEL!
I am:
I am the playing, but not the pause.
I am the effect, but not the cause.
I am the living, but not the cells.
I am the ringing, but not the bells.
I am the animal, but not the meat.
I am the walking, but not the feet.
I am the waves, but not the sea
Whatever my substrate, my me is still me.
I am the sparks in the dark that exist as a dream -
I am the process, but not the machine.
-
“A Verb Called Self” - Cælum est Conterrens

Next

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aelex, Ailiailia, Altaiire, Bakery Hill, Calimama, Conserative Morality, Equalaria, Ethel mermania, Farlanden, Free Rhenish States, Gallade, Jamzmania, Jeren, Khadgar, Lamadia III, Liberty and Alderney, Neutraligon, New Edom, Nioya, Novus America, Philjia, Republic of Canador, Soadino, Souseiseki, Terra Liberatus, Teryia, The Grim Reaper, The Holy Therns, The NRA Republic, Thegreatxyz, Uiiop, Wallenburg, Wolfmanne2, Yahoo [Bot]

Remove ads