Pope sued for driving without seat belt

by **Ifreann** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:42 pm

Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:The Pope is innocent!

There hasn't been an innocent Pope since 1724.

by **Astrolinium** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:25 pm

Why can't I pick that the Pope is guilty and that Knoot hates freedom?

Anyway, I don't believe in diplomatic immunity in the first place, so I definitely think he's guilty.

by **Genivaria** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:26 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:The Pope is innocent!

There hasn't been an innocent Pope since 1724.

by **The Parkus Empire** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:27 pm

Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:It's the Pope Mobile, not a freakin' Formula 1 race-car...I don't think the seatbelt is necessary.

I'm afraid is necessary.

by **Ceannairceach** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:34 pm

I personally wouldn't mind the Pope getting fined, but I don't know if there is much of a case here.

by **Israslovakahzerbajan** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:36 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:It's the Pope Mobile, not a freakin' Formula 1 race-car...I don't think the seatbelt is necessary.

I'm afraid is necessary.

So...the pope is Japanese now?

by **Bottle** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:43 pm

I'd like to see the Pope argue in court that, based on the fundamental belief system of Catholicism, there is no need for him to wear a seat belt. Surely God will not allow His chosen representative on Earth to come to harm unless/until God wishes this to happen.

Of course, the Pope's argument will be immediately undermined by the existence of the Popemobile. Because nothing says "I have faith in God's Plan" like riding around behind three inches of bullet-proof glass.

by **The Corparation** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:52 pm

A snail goes faster than the pope mobile.Honestly I don't see a need for them in it. That said diplomatic immunity. however is bring the lawsuit is a troll and people should not feed the trolls.

by **Gauthier** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:48 pm

Oh yeah, I can see the Popemobile going nitro on the Autobahn.

by **Empire of Symphonia** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:13 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Empire of Symphonia wrote:Mr Pope, as much as I adore you because I'm Catholic, please remember the law.

You're embarressing us.

You just made my day friend.

For the record, I am Catholic.

But I'm glad someone got a good laugh out of that.

by **The Corparation** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:52 am

Gauthier wrote:Oh yeah, I can see the Popemobile going nitro on the Autobahn.

That would actually be pretty cool.

by **Greed and Death** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:07 am

The Corparation wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Oh yeah, I can see the Popemobile going nitro on the Autobahn.

That would actually be pretty cool.

The new pope often times must drive 150 mph in order to speed excommunicate heretics.

by **Rotovia-** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:14 am

Putting public policy and religion aside, this is an interesting legal question. It is unusual for someone holding diplomatic immunity to be a citizen of the host country.

1. The Pope as head of state for the Vatican (a recognised nation) enjoys diplomatic and sovereign immunity
2. Mr Ratzinger, as a citizen of Germany, is subject to the laws of that nation

My opinion would be that there was a reasonable expectation of immunity and it does not serve the public interest to prosecute in this matter.

by **Sociobiology** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:31 pm

Rotovia- wrote:Putting public policy and religion aside, this is an interesting legal question. It is unusual for someone holding diplomatic immunity to be a citizen of the host country.

1. The Pope as head of state for the Vatican (a recognised nation) enjoys diplomatic and sovereign immunity
2. Mr Ratzinger, as a citizen of Germany, is subject to the laws of that nation

My opinion would be that there was a reasonable expectation of immunity and it does not serve the public interest to prosecute in this matter.

It could however be used to revoke his diplomat status and have him deported.

by **Risottia** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:35 pm

Knootoss wrote:A GERMAN citizen has filed a complaint against Pope Benedict XVI for not using a seat belt in the Popemobile during his September visit to his homeland. ...
Do you think the Pope should be convicted?

No. Germany recognizes the Vatican as a foreign country, and the Pope as its Head of State - hence, because of diplomatic immunity - mr.Ratzinger isn't subject to German laws.

Rotovia- wrote:2. Mr Ratzinger, as a citizen of Germany, is subject to the laws of that nation

Not quite: Mr.Ratzinger isn't a German citizen anymore (all cardinals lose their citizenship and become citizens of the Vatican).

On the other hand, he should have worn a damn seatbelt...

by **Kandorith** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:51 pm

Guilty, I say.

by **Caninope** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:48 pm

Risottia wrote:
Knootoss wrote:A GERMAN citizen has filed a complaint against Pope Benedict XVI for not using a seat belt in the Popemobile during his September visit to his homeland. ...
Do you think the Pope should be convicted?

No. Germany recognizes the Vatican as a foreign country, and the Pope as its Head of State - hence, because of diplomatic immunity - mr.Ratzinger isn't subject to German laws.

Rotovia- wrote:2. Mr Ratzinger, as a citizen of Germany, is subject to the laws of that nation

Not quite: Mr.Ratzinger isn't a German citizen anymore (all cardinals lose their citizenship and become citizens of the Vatican).

On the other hand, he should have worn a damn seatbelt...

Actually, Herr Ratzinger holds dual citizenship, by a deal worked out between Germany and the Vatican.

by **Nightkill the Emperor** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:09 pm

Damn Cani, wear your seatbelt more often.

by **The Corparation** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:36 pm

Risottia wrote:On the other hand, he should have worn a damn seatbelt...

Sealt belts are kind of pointless if you're barley going at walking pace though.

by **Astrolinium** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:37 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Risottia wrote:On the other hand, he should have worn a damn seatbelt...

Sealt belts are kind of pointless if you're barley going at walking pace though.

Not if someone else crashes into you.

by **Threlizdun** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:45 pm

I support the fine, not because I'm in favor of the laws, but the idea of the Pope forced into the courtroom like that is awesome.

by **Beringovia** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:44 pm

Ifreann wrote:
greed and death wrote:This man has standing to enforce German Seat belt laws ???

The German legal system is weird.

I don't think you need standing to make a complaint about someone breaking the law.

In the US criminal justice system, generally only the district attorney (or equivalent authority, depending upon the jurisdiction) has legal authority to initiate criminal proceedings. There are some exceptions, but that is generally how it works.

by **Caninope** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:46 pm

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Damn Cani, wear your seatbelt more often.

Hey, it might be a little late, but I've caught up with the times! Civil disobedience, fight the man, man!

by **Nightkill the Emperor** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:48 pm

Caninope wrote:
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Damn Cani, wear your seatbelt more often.

Hey, it might be a little late, but I've caught up with the times! Civil disobedience, fight the man, man!

You are the man.

Sig that out of context and I'll just facepalm and chuckle. Chuckepalm.

by **The Corparation** » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:50 pm

Astrolinium wrote:
The Corparation wrote:Sealt belts are kind of pointless if you're barley going at walking pace though.

Not if someone else crashes into you.

Because other cars are totally going to ram the pope mobile when its going down a closed street.

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

Pope sued for driving without seat belt

Papal Misdemeanor

Who is online