by Greater Czechia » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:57 pm
by JURISDICTIONS » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:19 am
Takaram wrote:Irony. Rule 4 prevents a repeal based on Rule 4 violations, meaning that Rule 4 does not comply with Rule 4. It should be struck down.
by Bears Armed » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:55 am
by Habsburg Yugoslavia » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:58 am
by East Jordan II » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:30 pm
by Improving Wordiness » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:50 am
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:13 am
by Maurdohpia (Ancient) » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:34 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:A good idea, but it means some issues which mention such will need to be modified with a variable. As for the field itself I think that could be available to all including new users.
by Herrebrugh » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:14 pm
by Servranckx » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:00 am
by UCDF » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:06 am
by New Freedomstan » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:07 am
by Zanannia » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:07 am
by The Most Glorious Hack » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:26 am
Servranckx wrote:How many 'supporters/signatures' would one require to pass a suggestion? I really like this one.
by Servranckx » Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:47 pm
by Butmanland » Sun Dec 26, 2010 7:19 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement