Left-winger/SJW feels guilty for his rapist to be deported

[The Rich Port]

Because I saw it, and it sums up the attitude of the subject of our discussion.
He'd rather feel upset about his rapist being deported than risk being a racist.
Whether it's real or not isn't the point.
It's the ranking of hurt feelings and hurty words as more of an egregious sin than actual physical harm against someone, something we've seen a few times from the SJW movements.

First of all, if you are resorting to fake pictures from right-wing websites dedicated to strawmanning the left to make your point, we have a problem. Also, you don't get to brush the veracity of the picture off, because you originally posted it without providing any sort of warning or disclaimer on the veracity of it. Either you didn't bother to fact-check, or you couldn't be bothered to make a disclaimer to avoid misleading those who would see that picture. Either way, you were irresponsible. Political discourse on the internet is already a clustercuss without you, or anyone else, resorting to hoaxes.

Second of all, I'm pretty sure you can't read this person's mind, so your claim that "he'd rather feel upset about his rapist being deported than risk being a racist" seems a bit of a stretch. You are speculating on his thought process, based on your own preconceptions about SJWs. And, from where I'm standing, the last sentence on your post doesn't really relate to this case.

A great point I haven't seen yet... Has the victim actually tried to... You know, stop the rapist from being deported?

All I've read is that he is guilty about it. A natural thing to feel, you feel lots of things when you're a rape victim, but a lot of rape victims also receive closure from the imprisonment of their rapists.

It means that they can't hurt anybody else.

[Chicago Heights]

I've seen this before, and I must say, when I first read it I was questioning my faith in humanity.
Paired up with Sweden trying to legalize necrophilia and incest, if this story is true, I actually believe the left are actually less intelligent than the right. By that, I mean politically and morally, and maybe even overall intelligence. Maybe it's just this man, and if it is I apologize, but I have a feeling a lot more would feel the same. This here is actually selflessness, but it's not the kind that matters; it's the stupid kind.

[The Rich Port]

I've seen this before, and I must say, when I first read it I was questioning my faith in humanity.
Paired up with Sweden trying to legalize necrophilia and incest, if this story is true, I actually believe the left are actually less intelligent than the right. By that, I mean politically and morally, and maybe even overall intelligence. Maybe it's just this man, and if it is I apologize, but I have a feeling a lot more would feel the same. This here is actually selflessness, but it's not the kind that matters; it's the stupid kind.

You would be incorrect in assuming. Buddy.

It's called "sympathy". Maybe let your cold, robot heart feel some.

Yeah, in this case, the guy is being overly sensitive and irrational about his feelings.

I remember there being cases of this where the rape victims were lauded for their willingness to forgive and see their perpetrators rehabilitated rather than punished.

I think you're letting your prejudice towards the Muslims that are REFUGEES here to color your perception.

Yes, this man is a criminal, and should be deported for his crimes, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE CRIMINALS AND THAT THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

In other words, your assumption that this selflessness is somehow indicative of our lessened intelligence is moronic and ignorant.

[Liriena]

I've seen this before, and I must say, when I first read it I was questioning my faith in humanity.
Paired up with Sweden trying to legalize necrophilia and incest, if this story is true, I actually believe the left are actually less intelligent than the right. By that, I mean politically and morally, and maybe even overall intelligence. Maybe it's just this man, and if it is I apologize, but I have a feeling a lot more would feel the same. This here is actually selflessness, but it's not the kind that matters; it's the stupid kind.

You would be incorrect in assuming. Buddy.

It's called "sympathy". Maybe let your cold, robot heart feel some.

Yeah, in this case, the guy is being overly sensitive and irrational about his feelings.

I remember there being cases of this where the rape victims were lauded for their willingness to forgive and see their perpetrators rehabilitated rather than punished.

I think you're letting your prejudice towards the Muslims that are REFUGEES here to color your perception.

Yes, this man is a criminal, and should be deported for his crimes, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE CRIMINALS AND THAT THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

In other words, your assumption that this selflessness is somehow indicative of our lessened intelligence is moronic and ignorant.

Also, Sweden isn't trying to legalize necrophilia or incest. Members of the youth wing of a minor political party in Sweden advocated for it. Furthermore, how can you conclude that "the left" are "less intelligent" because one Norwegian rape victim felt sorry for his attacker being deported, and members of the youth wing of the Liberal People's Party (which is actually a centre-right party) advocating for the legalization of incest and necrophilia? And what exactly are you comparing these two isolated cases to, in order to derive that conclusion?

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I've seen this before, and I must say, when I first read it I was questioning my faith in humanity.
Paired up with Sweden trying to legalize necrophilia and incest, if this story is true, I actually believe the left are actually less intelligent than the right. By that, I mean politically and morally, and maybe even overall intelligence. Maybe it's just this man, and if it is I apologize, but I have a feeling a lot more would feel the same. This here is actually selflessness, but it's not the kind that matters; it's the stupid kind.

You make it sound like actually giving a shit about people, even if they do you wrong, is a bad thing.

You must be fun to hang out with.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

You would be incorrect in assuming. Buddy.

It's called "sympathy". Maybe let your cold, robot heart feel some.

Yeah, in this case, the guy is being overly sensitive and irrational about his feelings.

I remember there being cases of this where the rape victims were lauded for their willingness to forgive and see their perpetrators rehabilitated rather than punished.

I think you're letting your prejudice towards the Muslims that are REFUGEES here to color your perception.

Yes, this man is a criminal, and should be deported for his crimes, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE CRIMINALS AND THAT THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

In other words, your assumption that this selflessness is somehow indicative of our lessened intelligence is moronic and ignorant.

Also, Sweden isn't trying to legalize necrophilia or incest. Members of the youth wing of a minor political party in Sweden advocated for it. Furthermore, how can you conclude that "the left" are "less intelligent" because one Norwegian rape victim felt sorry for his attacker being deported, and members of the youth wing of the Liberal People's Party (which is actually a centre-right party) advocating for the legalization of incest and necrophilia? And what exactly are you comparing these two isolated cases to, in order to derive that conclusion?

I mean, going by his logic I should punch someone in the face and knock their teeth out if they so much glance the wrong way at me. Not only that, but then my subsequent defense would be "why should I give a fuck about people?! Huh? They were looking at me THE WRONG WAY! Just look at that sand nigger! I'm sure he was planning to kill me any second!"

[Kaltland]

I have spoken to Japanese people.
You can interact with Japanese people all you want. But you are still wrong and I am right. Japan is overwhelmingly racially/culturally homogenous.

lol

No, it really isn't and it never was. Japan is an archipelago. It is a country of islands, each with their own unique features and culture. Furthermore, it is a mountainous archipelago with little arable land so Honshu (that would be the big island) is like an island of islands with people confined mostly to the plains and separated by mountains.

The culture in Tokyo is different to that in Osaka (people from Osaka tend to think that people from Tokyo are too serious), the culture in Kyoto is different to that in Tokyo (Kyoto is generally perceived as being a bit stuck up). Saitama has its own culture, Gunma has its own culture, Niigata has its own culture, Nagano has its own culture, Aomori has its own culture, Hiroshima has its own culture. Okinawa has its own culture (which is really very different from the culture of the rest of Japan), Hokkaido has its own culture...

Saying that Japan is culturally homogeneous is as stupid as saying that any other country is culturally homogeneous. Unless you're talking about San Marino or some other really tiny country, every country has cultural diversity, some of which is native to the country and some of which is imported from neighbouring or particularly influential cultures.

Also, pretending that Japan is culturally super Japanese ignores a lot of history (e.g. the fact that the Meiji restoration happened) and the reality of Japan.

More often it does. Because most multi-culturalists are have no problem with miscegenation, blending of cultures and subsequent tainting (even destruction in some cases) of both.
In fact I don't know a single multi-culturalist who is against miscegenation, the blending of cultures and subsequent tainting (even destruction in some cases) of both.

There's definitely nothing wrong with miscegenation. Race is a social construct which is only meaningful because we give it meaning. Interracial relationships do not "taint" anything.

All of those are sub-cultures of Japan but still Japanese. So when I said that Japan is overwhelmingly racially and culturally homogenous I meant in terms of being free from non-Japanese influence.

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race and weakens the cultural bond of both sides especially in the long term. Miscegenation is a form of genocide. The only difference is that a race and culture dies out over the long run instead of in a very small time frame. So in some aspects it could be considered even worse than traditional ethnic cleansing.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race and weakens the cultural bond of both sides especially in the long term. Miscegenation is a form of genocide. The only difference is that a race and culture dies out over the long run instead of in a very small time frame. So in some aspects it could be considered even worse than traditional ethnic cleansing.

My question is: if people willingly choose to have children with other people outside of their race, do you give a single fuck in so far as it affecting your standard of living?

My guess would be no. So why give a fuck?

[The Rich Port]

All of those are sub-cultures of Japan but still Japanese. So when I said that Japan is overwhelmingly racially and culturally homogenous I meant in terms of being free from non-Japanese influence.

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race and weakens the cultural bond of both sides especially in the long term. Miscegenation is a form of genocide. The only difference is that a race and culture dies out over the long run instead of in a very small time frame. So in some aspects it could be considered even worse than traditional ethnic cleansing.

Hate to break it to you, buddy, but some Japanese actually see the other cultures of Japan as... Non-Japanese, funnily enough.

Are they somehow ignorant or is this idea of yours frankly just not worth considering at all, whether it's you or the former?

I think most Japanese would disagree with you. They have prejudices, I'm sure, but the thing about prejudice is that, once people interact with other cultures, they find they are very similar.

[Baltenstein]

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race

So there we were, the Black race and the White race, and from one moment to another, wouldn't you know, BOOM!

Our physical appearance got destroyed by miscegenation. Horrible. Just horrible.

[Kaltland]

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race and weakens the cultural bond of both sides especially in the long term. Miscegenation is a form of genocide. The only difference is that a race and culture dies out over the long run instead of in a very small time frame. So in some aspects it could be considered even worse than traditional ethnic cleansing.

My question is: if people willingly choose to have children with other people outside of their race, do you give a single fuck in so far as it affecting your standard of living?

My guess would be no. So why give a fuck?

Yes. I care a lot. Because to me it is racial and cultural destruction at work. I don't have much power to prevent them though. So that is a bummer.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

My question is: if people willingly choose to have children with other people outside of their race, do you give a single fuck in so far as it affecting your standard of living?

My guess would be no. So why give a fuck?

Yes. I care a lot. Because to me it is racial and cultural destruction at work. I don't have much power to prevent them though. So that is a bummer.

If you don't have much power to prevent it, then why bother?

I mean, I also wish people wouldn't say stupid shit in the internet, and yet here we are.

[Chicago Heights]

I've seen this before, and I must say, when I first read it I was questioning my faith in humanity.
Paired up with Sweden trying to legalize necrophilia and incest, if this story is true, I actually believe the left are actually less intelligent than the right. By that, I mean politically and morally, and maybe even overall intelligence. Maybe it's just this man, and if it is I apologize, but I have a feeling a lot more would feel the same. This here is actually selflessness, but it's not the kind that matters; it's the stupid kind.

You would be incorrect in assuming. Buddy.

It's called "sympathy". Maybe let your cold, robot heart feel some.

Yeah, in this case, the guy is being overly sensitive and irrational about his feelings.

I remember there being cases of this where the rape victims were lauded for their willingness to forgive and see their perpetrators rehabilitated rather than punished.

I think you're letting your prejudice towards the Muslims that are REFUGEES here to color your perception.

Yes, this man is a criminal, and should be deported for his crimes, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE CRIMINALS AND THAT THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

In other words, your assumption that this selflessness is somehow indicative of our lessened intelligence is moronic and ignorant.

Ok, then it's stupid sympathy, which is essentially what I said before. And my heart is perfectly soft and warm, thank you.
What I find funny about this post is that you think I'm prejudiced towards Muslims even though there is little to no evidence to prove so. I did not mention Muslims and I don't have anything anti-muslim in my signature or profile. Not to mention I completely forgot the rapist came from a Muslim country until now. So, no, my 'Evil racist right-wing capitalist' views are not influencing my opinion on this.
 

You would be incorrect in assuming. Buddy.

It's called "sympathy". Maybe let your cold, robot heart feel some.

Yeah, in this case, the guy is being overly sensitive and irrational about his feelings.

I remember there being cases of this where the rape victims were lauded for their willingness to forgive and see their perpetrators rehabilitated rather than punished.

I think you're letting your prejudice towards the Muslims that are REFUGEES here to color your perception.

Yes, this man is a criminal, and should be deported for his crimes, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE CRIMINALS AND THAT THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

In other words, your assumption that this selflessness is somehow indicative of our lessened intelligence is moronic and ignorant.

Also, Sweden isn't trying to legalize necrophilia or incest. Members of the youth wing of a minor political party in Sweden advocated for it. Furthermore, how can you conclude that "the left" are "less intelligent" because one Norwegian rape victim felt sorry for his attacker being deported, and members of the youth wing of the Liberal People's Party (which is actually a centre-right party) advocating for the legalization of incest and necrophilia? And what exactly are you comparing these two isolated cases to, in order to derive that conclusion?

1. Said man is a politician
2. Said party's views is agreed with by many and is a major political party in Sweden
3. Europe as a whole

I've seen this before, and I must say, when I first read it I was questioning my faith in humanity.
Paired up with Sweden trying to legalize necrophilia and incest, if this story is true, I actually believe the left are actually less intelligent than the right. By that, I mean politically and morally, and maybe even overall intelligence. Maybe it's just this man, and if it is I apologize, but I have a feeling a lot more would feel the same. This here is actually selflessness, but it's not the kind that matters; it's the stupid kind.

You make it sound like actually giving a shit about people, even if they do you wrong, is a bad thing.

You must be fun to hang out with.

I mean, going by his logic I should punch someone in the face and knock their teeth out if they so much glance the wrong way at me. Not only that, but then my subsequent defense would be "why should I give a fuck about people?! Huh? They were looking at me THE WRONG WAY! Just look at that sand nigger! I'm sure he was planning to kill me any second!"

Well, I don't know about you, but if I was a victim of the second most malicious and violent crime I wouldn't give to f*cks about the criminal who did that, unless they weren't punished.

How is beating the absolute crap out of someone the same as deporting a *ahem* 'sand n*gger' who raped someone? No, that is not my logic at all.

---

I will accept that I was wrong about my 'left wingers are stupid' post; I was generalizing. What I should have said is that most SJWs are stupid. Sorry about that.

[Kaltland]

All of those are sub-cultures of Japan but still Japanese. So when I said that Japan is overwhelmingly racially and culturally homogenous I meant in terms of being free from non-Japanese influence.

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race and weakens the cultural bond of both sides especially in the long term. Miscegenation is a form of genocide. The only difference is that a race and culture dies out over the long run instead of in a very small time frame. So in some aspects it could be considered even worse than traditional ethnic cleansing.

Hate to break it to you, buddy, but some Japanese actually see the other cultures of Japan as... Non-Japanese, funnily enough.

Are they somehow ignorant or is this idea of yours frankly just not worth considering at all, whether it's you or the former?

I think most Japanese would disagree with you. They have prejudices, I'm sure, but the thing about prejudice is that, once people interact with other cultures, they find they are very similar.

They can view them as non-Japanese but that doesn't change the fact that they are still Japanese and merely variations of the same Japanese culture. Which by the way is beautiful in itself. It is beautiful that a culture has in itself even more depth in the form of sub-cultures. That is worth preserving and keeping pure.

I have no problem with cultures interacting and learning about each other. What I do not like and agree on is cultures merging together into one.

[Liriena]

Also, Sweden isn't trying to legalize necrophilia or incest. Members of the youth wing of a minor political party in Sweden advocated for it. Furthermore, how can you conclude that "the left" are "less intelligent" because one Norwegian rape victim felt sorry for his attacker being deported, and members of the youth wing of the Liberal People's Party (which is actually a centre-right party) advocating for the legalization of incest and necrophilia? And what exactly are you comparing these two isolated cases to, in order to derive that conclusion?

1. Said man is a politician

From what I gather, he is not. He's just affiliated to a political party. Not everyone who is a member of a political party is a politician.

2. Said party's views is agreed with by many and is a major political party in Sweden

How many agree? And it's only a "major political party" in the sense that it has some members in the Swedish parliament. Their youth wing, however, is not part of the parliamentary process, and as far as I know, the party itself has not endorsed their proposal. Furthermore, as I pointed out before, the party is centre-right, as is the youth wing in question, so your claim that it demonstrates that "the left" is lacking in intelligence holds no water.

3. Europe as a whole

How vague.

[Kaltland]

Everything is wrong with miscegenation. It destroys the physical appearance of a race

So there we were, the Black race and the White race, and from one moment to another, wouldn't you know, BOOM!

Our physical appearance got destroyed by miscegenation. Horrible. Just horrible.

Yes. Horrible. I don't care how pretty she is.
Ancestral genome has been completely destroyed. And she is the personification of that destruction. She is called a hybrid.

[Liriena]

What I should have said is that most SJWs are stupid.

No. You should not have called anyone "stupid", period. Dismissing your political opponents as intellectually challenged is cheap, petty, and irresponsible, specially if your basis for doing so are two isolated, one of which you have grossly misinterpreted.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Well, I don't know about you, but if I was a victim of the second most malicious and violent crime I wouldn't give to f*cks about the criminal who did that, unless they weren't punished.

How is beating the absolute crap out of someone the same as deporting a *ahem* 'sand n*gger' who raped someone? No, that is not my logic at all.

---

I will accept that I was wrong about my 'left wingers are stupid' post; I was generalizing. What I should have said is that most SJWs are stupid. Sorry about that.

That's you. A lot of people would have conflicting feelings about the situation. A lot of people do, regardless of political affiliation. Having mixed feelings about an event is normal. Having sympathy for an enemy is normal too.

Also, the deporting is not the bad part, what your logic proposes is the bad part, or rather, where you're wrong.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

So there we were, the Black race and the White race, and from one moment to another, wouldn't you know, BOOM!

(Image)

Our physical appearance got destroyed by miscegenation. Horrible. Just horrible.

Yes. Horrible. I don't care how pretty she is.
Ancestral genome has been completely destroyed. And she is the personification of that destruction. She is called a hybrid.

I mean, we have some similarities in our DNA to a banana.

Does that imply I should shove a banana up someone's ass or not?

[Kaltland]

Yes. I care a lot. Because to me it is racial and cultural destruction at work. I don't have much power to prevent them though. So that is a bummer.

If you don't have much power to prevent it, then why bother?

I mean, I also wish people wouldn't say stupid shit in the internet, and yet here we are.

I bother because what is wrong needs to be put right. And I will work in my life to maximise the chances of this change occurring by informing everyone of the correct path.

[Kaltland]

Yes. Horrible. I don't care how pretty she is.
Ancestral genome has been completely destroyed. And she is the personification of that destruction. She is called a hybrid.

I mean, we have some similarities in our DNA to a banana.

Does that imply I should shove a banana up someone's ass or not?

*Facepalm*

Are you a banana...?
There you have the answer.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

If you don't have much power to prevent it, then why bother?

I mean, I also wish people wouldn't say stupid shit in the internet, and yet here we are.

I bother because what is wrong needs to be put right. And I will work in my life to maximise the chances of this change occurring by informing everyone of the correct path.

There's nothing wrong with people literally having children with other people. The fuck?

Look, I understand you think dating outside of your race/culture is wrong, but very few people do that. We seek people with our same background. Some of us simply don't think background is relevant when it comes to a partner to have children with, in particular if we travel a lot.

The fact that you think people simply being people is going to ruin your "ancestral lineage" -- which, I must remark, is bullshit -- is unfounded in reality.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I mean, we have some similarities in our DNA to a banana.

Does that imply I should shove a banana up someone's ass or not?

*Facepalm*

Are you a banana...?
There you have the answer.

I mean, you're the one suggesting we must PRESERVE ancestral DNA as if it was fucking Noah's Ark or National Treasure. Not me.

[The Rich Port]

Hate to break it to you, buddy, but some Japanese actually see the other cultures of Japan as... Non-Japanese, funnily enough.

Are they somehow ignorant or is this idea of yours frankly just not worth considering at all, whether it's you or the former?

I think most Japanese would disagree with you. They have prejudices, I'm sure, but the thing about prejudice is that, once people interact with other cultures, they find they are very similar.

They can view them as non-Japanese but that doesn't change the fact that they are still Japanese and merely variations of the same Japanese culture. Which by the way is beautiful in itself. It is beautiful that a culture has in itself even more depth in the form of sub-cultures. That is worth preserving and keeping pure.

I have no problem with cultures interacting and learning about each other. What I do not like and agree on is cultures merging together into one.

Then you realize that it's a matter of opinion. Plenty of Japanese disagree with you, and think otherwise. The Ainu and the Ryukyan peoples especially have gone almost extinct in the past due to a desire for Japanese mainland homogeneity.

Cultures that interact and learn about each other inevitably change each other, for better and for worse, and there is very little anybody can do about it. In much the same way Japan has influenced America and other countries, it has been influenced.

Your argument that homogeneity is somehow good makes no sense.

[Gauthier]

I've seen Internet Islamic Scholars, but never thought I'd see a gaijin Japan scholar. Which also reminds me of a term for Western Japan junkies.