NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Type 6

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will OP the next MGVoYN[NM] thread?

Imperializt Russia
39
25%
Anemos Major
52
33%
Questers
8
5%
Dragomere
21
13%
Dostanuot Loj
5
3%
The Kievan People
22
14%
Oaledonia
12
8%
 
Total votes : 159

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu May 15, 2014 1:51 pm

Anemos Major wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Thing is, I fail to see the inferiority in question. I am not talking about front line vehicles here. But basically about something like the Pzh 2000, just with a casemate instead of a turret. I actually do not see how the capability to aim with a turret as opposed to by rotating the vehicle matters in the case of long range artillery anyway.


Oh, we're talking about artillery.

In which case - what's the significant benefit of removing the turret given that we've established the cost/benefit implications of doing so are proportionately much smaller than they used to be? And given that it's artillery, considering the dispersion of rounds at extended ranges, have you considered the fact that this minute cost reduction would be accompanied in turn by a difficulty in aiming that would increase set-up and aiming times by requiring the process to be conducted through the driver using a much less precise gun-laying mechanism (i.e. the tracks) and probably an increase to round dispersion over extended ranges for the same reason?

In all honesty, I can't imagine a casemate artillery gun being without some form of slight traverse within its mounting, something like a 10-20 degree arc.
Purpelia wrote:
Anemos Major wrote:Oh, we're talking about artillery.

Yes, I specifically mentioned so.

In which case - what's the significant benefit of removing the turret given that we've established the cost/benefit implications of doing so are proportionately much smaller than they used to be? And given that it's artillery, considering the dispersion of rounds at extended ranges, have you considered the fact that this minute cost reduction would be accompanied in turn by a difficulty in aiming that would increase set-up and aiming times by requiring the process to be conducted through the driver using a much less precise gun-laying mechanism (i.e. the tracks) and probably an increase to round dispersion over extended ranges for the same reason?

How much of an effect would it really have though? Especially since you could reasonably couple the steering to a computerized targeting system for fun and profit.

Put it this way. In artillery competitions (as occasionally arise in Russia), the amount of heating from the sun of the crate at the top of a pile can affect its shot placement.

Artillery fire is as fickle as sniper fire. Artillery can afford near misses, and is largely based upon it. Tank fire cannot to the same degree, and accuracy is more vital in that role, but the range is of course reduced. But minimising the large sources of error is more than desirable.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Thu May 15, 2014 1:58 pm

Purpelia wrote:How much of an effect would it really have though? Especially since you could reasonably couple the steering to a computerized targeting system for fun and profit.


Greater wear on the tracks and automotive system. Turning a turret is easier than pivot-turning the whole vehicle.

Purpelia wrote:If the down sides can be circumvented yes.
Without a traversing turret the resulting vehicle would be smaller and lighter. Something that would be favorable in terms of strategic mobility. And the mechanical simplicity of the system (since coding is easier to fix and maintain than gears) would make it easier to manufacture and maintain over time.


Not by all that much. Even NLOS-C had a turret, and it was very compact relative to the M109 and PzH 2000. And if mobility is really that much of a concern, put it on a truck like CAESAR, ATMOS, Archer, or G6.

The Rising Sun Katana wrote:You do agree that a Battalion of S-tanks, dug in hull down in defensive fire positions assisting the Infantry defensive front, are very effective at anti-tank work? This is the primary use of our S-tanks in our Infantry Divisions. Supporting fire to breach enemy defensive works is a secondary priority.


Unless your infantry divisions are designed for nothing but defensive warfare, it's a waste. And if they are, it's still easier and more efficient to buy more multi-purpose vehicles. Notice how no nation except Sweden fielded the S-tank, even though pretty much every military fields infantry.

What does an S-tank do that a regular tank cannot that justifies the expense?
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu May 15, 2014 2:07 pm

If an S-tank is dug-in, it probably won't achieve much but burn.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Thu May 15, 2014 2:57 pm

Been thinking about the stats. And I realize I have no idea what else to put besides what I have. Ive seen your guy's stats for tanks, but I have no idea what half the stuff you put mean to be honest.

The way I made this was using a T-80 for reference so you could say it's a variant/stolen concept of aT-80. It was developed in 1986, and is in duty to the present, though they are quite rare since after design Golheim only produced six hundred of them. They now mainly patrol the Capitol and a couple of other big cities, more for scare tactics than anything really.

Image


Name:OY-85
Weight:46 Metric Tons
Crew: 3
Main armament: 120mm cannon(There is also 105mm variant but none were produced beyond prototype)
Secondary armaments: LW50MG, M60 (I know the mounted gun on top doesn't look like an M60, I just cant make one in Sketchup)
Engine: 1,250 hp Diesel
Speed: 30-40 Mph



Note: Golheim has a pretty cheap armored division, so Im not going for the best of the best here. Also These are literally the only tanks Golheim owns. Every things else are just variants of the BTR.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu May 15, 2014 3:10 pm

The gun barrel looks rather short, and also quite slender.
The oil drums could stand to be considerably large, but it's broadly a nice image.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Thu May 15, 2014 3:50 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:If an S-tank is dug-in, it probably won't achieve much but burn.


This.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Thu May 15, 2014 4:08 pm

The Rising Sun Katana wrote:You do agree that a Battalion of S-tanks, dug in hull down in defensive fire positions assisting the Infantry defensive front, are very effective at anti-tank work? This is the primary use of our S-tanks in our Infantry Divisions. Supporting fire to breach enemy defensive works is a secondary priority.


1. As said, the S-Tank has a bit of a traverse problem if it is dug in.
2. Frankly, a Merkava IV battalion would be even better.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu May 15, 2014 6:36 pm

Golheim wrote:Been thinking about the stats. And I realize I have no idea what else to put besides what I have. Ive seen your guy's stats for tanks, but I have no idea what half the stuff you put mean to be honest.

The way I made this was using a T-80 for reference so you could say it's a variant/stolen concept of aT-80. It was developed in 1986, and is in duty to the present, though they are quite rare since after design Golheim only produced six hundred of them. They now mainly patrol the Capitol and a couple of other big cities, more for scare tactics than anything really.



Name:OY-85
Weight:46 Metric Tons
Crew: 3
Main armament: 120mm cannon(There is also 105mm variant but none were produced beyond prototype)
Secondary armaments: LW50MG, M60 (I know the mounted gun on top doesn't look like an M60, I just cant make one in Sketchup)
Engine: 1,250 hp Diesel
Speed: 30-40 Mph



Note: Golheim has a pretty cheap armored division, so Im not going for the best of the best here. Also These are literally the only tanks Golheim owns. Every things else are just variants of the BTR.
The commanders hatchis too far forwards
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Thu May 15, 2014 7:04 pm

Better? Also do you know what else I need to add to stats. I was thinking that armor would probably be needed and ive been looking up on it but I dont feel I know enough to just copy paste from Wikipedia, especially when i dont understand what some of the acronyms even mean. :p
Image

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu May 15, 2014 7:17 pm

Golheim wrote:Better? Also do you know what else I need to add to stats. I was thinking that armor would probably be needed and ive been looking up on it but I dont feel I know enough to just copy paste from Wikipedia, especially when i dont understand what some of the acronyms even mean. :p
Yes - unfortunately for you the t-80 turret is not flat on the top. This is so the gun can depress.

I would leave armour until last. You should add: dimensions, powerplant type, suspension type, transmission type, speed offroad in kph and speed on paved road kph, # shells stored, calibre of main gun.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Thu May 15, 2014 7:23 pm

Questers wrote:
Golheim wrote:Better? Also do you know what else I need to add to stats. I was thinking that armor would probably be needed and ive been looking up on it but I dont feel I know enough to just copy paste from Wikipedia, especially when i dont understand what some of the acronyms even mean. :p
Yes - unfortunately for you the t-80 turret is not flat on the top. This is so the gun can depress.

I would leave armour until last. You should add: dimensions, powerplant type, suspension type, transmission type, speed offroad in kph and speed on paved road kph, # shells stored, calibre of main gun.


Yeah, I couldnt get the curve on the turret like a wanted and still be able to put everything on there easily. Trying to add anything coming out of the curve is a pain in the ass. I hope its not too big of a problem. I Assumed it could still run and fight and not die instantly without curved turret, because I thought it was just aesthetic. Which is ridiculous since now i realize everything on a tank is there for a reason.

Also Ill get to doing homework on those stats. So fun and interesting, but so time consuming, especially when I dont want to miss anything stupidly apparent.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Thu May 15, 2014 7:27 pm

Golheim wrote:Better? Also do you know what else I need to add to stats. I was thinking that armor would probably be needed and ive been looking up on it but I dont feel I know enough to just copy paste from Wikipedia, especially when i dont understand what some of the acronyms even mean. :p


For the most part, armor would just be a general list of certain materials. It's pretty vague most of the time, since a lot of the information is pretty well protected and not publicly available for the most modern of tanks. Which is why NS tanks often rely on grabbing things from concept proposals and early research papers.

I would replace the M60 with something... better. Like an M240.

Since you have a 3D model, you would also have an easier time providing figures for things like ground contact length, track width, and other useful things that are hard to show in conventional lineart. Operational range is also a useful figure and at your discretion, the manufacturer.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Thu May 15, 2014 7:34 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:I would replace the M60 with something... better. Like an M240.


Once again, a showcase of how wrong my thinking was when I first jumped in. I chose the M60 just because I thought it was cool, not for any reason. Which I see is the wrong way to go about it.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu May 15, 2014 7:39 pm

IMO there's nothing wrong wtih choosing something you think is cool OOCly so long as its something that would reasonably happen IC. Its possible Golheim has leftover M60s and just doesn't want to pay to acquire M240s.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25549
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Thu May 15, 2014 7:40 pm

Golheim wrote:
The Akasha Colony wrote:I would replace the M60 with something... better. Like an M240.


Once again, a showcase of how wrong my thinking was when I first jumped in. I chose the M60 just because I thought it was cool, not for any reason. Which I see is the wrong way to go about it.

No, it's actually the right way.

http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Kampalan_Navy

Sea Vixens G
Last edited by Gallia- on Thu May 15, 2014 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Thu May 15, 2014 9:53 pm

This is what I have so far for stats.

Name:OY-85
Manufacturer: Golheim Homeland Armaments
Weight:46 Metric Tons
Height: 2.36 meters
Length: 9.9 meters
Width: 4.14 meters
Crew: 3
Main armament: 2A46 125 mm gun
Secondary armaments: LW50MG, M240
Engine: Model 84 V-84 12-cyl. diesel
Speed: 70 km/h (43 mph) (road) 48 km/h (30 mph) (cross country)
Fuel capacity: 1,100 liters
Operational range: 550–650 km
Suspension: Torsion bar

User avatar
Deutsche Demokratischer Volksstaat
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Deutsche Demokratischer Volksstaat » Thu May 15, 2014 10:27 pm

imho it gets boring when you try to optimize everything and pursue the best everything

flavor > optimization all day everyday
Deutsche Demokratischer Volksstaat [DDV]
German Democratic People's State

National Anthem Auferstanden aus Ruinen | Song of the NVA Zinnsoldat
The Iron Curtain Kid A Boy's Life in the German Democratic Republic
Main Battle Tank Kampfpanzer 72 Ausf G
Questers wrote:Tank design by nation.

Russian tanks are designed to win winter.
Chinese tanks are designed by Russia.
Japanese tanks are designed to win anime.
German tanks are designed to win racecourses.
French tanks are designed to win beauty competitions.
American tanks are designed to win congress.
British tanks are designed to win battles.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Thu May 15, 2014 10:31 pm

Deutsche Demokratischer Volksstaat wrote:imho it gets boring when you try to optimize everything and pursue the best everything

flavor > optimization all day everyday


Without background, however, it is very difficult to differentiate flavor from lack of knowledge. The M60 would work fine, but there is no way to know whether it was intentionally selected over better alternatives, or whether it was due to oversight. Lacking any information that would indicate such, I usually presume a nation is working toward optimization, since that is the only thing that can really be advised on (flavor being very subjective).
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu May 15, 2014 10:54 pm

Realism is not choosing the best option but choosing the option that is most realistic for your nation. We just get a lot of homogenity because nations on NS are set up to be be min-max. As Akasha says, we don't know people's countries so well, so on these threads we tend to provide comparative analysis rather than direct advice about what to do. We generally try to decide what is best, rather than what ought to be taken.
Last edited by Questers on Thu May 15, 2014 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Thu May 15, 2014 11:11 pm

I honestly chose the m60 because I was like, Hey who doesn't love rambo. But what im trying to do with Golheim is focus mainly on infantry. So in the case of the M60 or M240 I would probably go for whatever is "better", since I would already be using that in my army. But for the rest of the tank I am going for what ever is the best for a cheap price.

Edit: I dont have my infantry flushed out all the way, so that is why I seem confused on what they use.
Last edited by Golheim on Thu May 15, 2014 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Thu May 15, 2014 11:56 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Because of limitations in capability, and as a cost-saving measure. Today, it's not true that turreted tanks are more expensive than casemated guns.


Turreted tanks are still more expensive than fixed vehicles, if only because of the inherent mechanical complexity in adding a turret drive and having to build a separate turret to fit into the turret ring (that also has to be cut into the hull). But this expense is no longer that significant given the increased cost of other components, especially the electronics. And because it now creates the drawback of being unable to fire on the move, which wasn't previously a disadvantage for casemates.

ball bearings aren't a major contributing cost to armies any more

it's incompetent procurement
Questers wrote:Realism is not choosing the best option but choosing the option that is most realistic for your nation. We just get a lot of homogenity because nations on NS are set up to be be min-max. As Akasha says, we don't know people's countries so well, so on these threads we tend to provide comparative analysis rather than direct advice about what to do. We generally try to decide what is best, rather than what ought to be taken.
technically modern tanks fall into pretty much three categories, high-technology light, low-technology light, high-technology heavy.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Fri May 16, 2014 3:44 am

Next tank that I have been working on. Doesn't have any stats yet, beyond it having an 70-80 mm gun and is a two man crew. (dont know exact measurements of the gun since sketchup doesnt go into millimeters) I just wanted to check that I have everything and nothing is too wrong with it. I was wondering about the optics. I have some scopes a broader camera and a swivel camera.

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Fri May 16, 2014 3:58 am

Golheim wrote:Next tank that I have been working on. Doesn't have any stats yet, beyond it having an 70-80 mm gun and is a two man crew. (dont know exact measurements of the gun since sketchup doesnt go into millimeters) I just wanted to check that I have everything and nothing is too wrong with it. I was wondering about the optics. I have some scopes a broader camera and a swivel camera.






Looks good (although I'm far from an expert.) What did you use to make it?

User avatar
Golheim
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Nov 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Golheim » Fri May 16, 2014 4:01 am

Google SketchUp. Its free to use and after screwing around a bit all the buttons start to make sense. Of course there are tutorial videos, but who needs those anyway.

User avatar
Zeinbrad
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29535
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeinbrad » Fri May 16, 2014 4:26 am

So I am going to, for my North Korea based nation, use the Chonma-Ho and Pokpung-Ho as their frontline tanks.

How will they fair against Not!Abrams and Not!K1's and K2's?
“There are three ways to ultimate success:
The first way is to be kind.
The second way is to be kind.
The third way is to be kind.”
― Fred Rogers
Currently looking for an artist for a Star Wars fan comic I want to make.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Tumbra

Advertisement

Remove ads