NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Type 6

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will OP the next MGVoYN[NM] thread?

Imperializt Russia
39
25%
Anemos Major
52
33%
Questers
8
5%
Dragomere
21
13%
Dostanuot Loj
5
3%
The Kievan People
22
14%
Oaledonia
12
8%
 
Total votes : 159

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:53 pm

Dat cua Tien wrote:Does anyone know how the engine in the Merkava is mounted? It's longitudinal right? And if so, does anyone know of a picture or video where they show the driver position, since it'd be limited width wise I would think? (at least that isn't the few second glance from the Future Weapons video)

Fordorsia wrote:
Probably because they're not fast enough to make the tops of the tracks flap about and fall off. Soviet tanks of much gloriousness are designed to always move forward comrade!


I simply searched "merkava engine" on Google images on my phone and got what you need. They were the first two images.

My stupid phone won't let me link them here though. Grrr.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Dat cua Tien
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 112
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Dat cua Tien » Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:08 pm

Dostanuot Loj wrote:
Dat cua Tien wrote:Does anyone know how the engine in the Merkava is mounted? It's longitudinal right? And if so, does anyone know of a picture or video where they show the driver position, since it'd be limited width wise I would think? (at least that isn't the few second glance from the Future Weapons video)



I simply searched "merkava engine" on Google images on my phone and got what you need. They were the first two images.

My stupid phone won't let me link them here though. Grrr.


I have a picture showing the engine bay, which is much longer than it is wide which makes me believe it's longitudinal, as well as a picture showing it being removed and it's in that orientation, but nothing while it's in (though I guess that's probably still classified for some reason.) That's kind of is contradictory with the use the engine to save the crew I would think though, which is why I wanted to double check* (though I guess no one cares about drivers because they're easier to train than gunners and commanders.)

*though I'm really just trying to figure out what the driver's compartment is like, and if it'd be an acceptable layout
Last edited by Dat cua Tien on Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:00 am

Typical streets are about 8 meters wide, not including side walks. So, I think I'll need a gun barrel with side-overhang of no more then 3 meters.

Hmm.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:56 am

Dat cua Tien wrote:
Dostanuot Loj wrote:
I simply searched "merkava engine" on Google images on my phone and got what you need. They were the first two images.

My stupid phone won't let me link them here though. Grrr.


I have a picture showing the engine bay, which is much longer than it is wide which makes me believe it's longitudinal, as well as a picture showing it being removed and it's in that orientation, but nothing while it's in (though I guess that's probably still classified for some reason.) That's kind of is contradictory with the use the engine to save the crew I would think though, which is why I wanted to double check* (though I guess no one cares about drivers because they're easier to train than gunners and commanders.)

*though I'm really just trying to figure out what the driver's compartment is like, and if it'd be an acceptable layout

Its not classified. Nobody's bothered to post it. You can simply put two and two together with images of the power pack and engine bay. The drivers space is narrow and cramped, but fits one man.

The engine is not forward for crew safety and never was. In fact it makes the armour thinner. Its there to allow the crew to reload the tank hilariously faster And evac without being sprayed with MG fire when hit.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:02 am

I can't imagine the driver's station being any more cramped than the Leopard's where he's rammed up against the ammunition bin, can he?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Paragania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1304
Founded: Aug 03, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Paragania » Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:29 am

Image
LT-20 Stallion

The LT-20 "Stallion" light tank was developed by the Delta-Dynamics as a private venture. The main goal was to meet the firepower of modern main battle tanks, but with greater tactical and strategic mobility. The first prototype of the LT-20 was completed in 1998. After extensive trials development of this light tank was finally completed in 2001. Despite that further improvements in a number of areas continued, especially electronics. The CV90120-T is being actively proposed for possible customers worldwide, however as of 2010 no production orders were placed on this light tank.

The LT-20 is armed with a fully-stabilized Swiss Ordnance 120-mm high-pressure low-recoil smoothbore gun. It fires modern NATO ammunition. A total of 48 rounds for the main gun are carried. Claimed maximum rate of fire is up to 16 rounds per minute. The LT-20 light tank is fitted with a computerized fire control system and stabilized day/night sights. The vehicle's integrated battlefield management system ensures situational awareness.

User avatar
Vetok
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1986
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Vetok » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:39 am

Image

Done the medium variant to my Cavalier light tank. Carries a 6-pounder in a remodelled turret which will also have a co-axial MG when I get round to it, and thus loses the awkwardly-placed hull mount MG from the Cavalier.
Last edited by Vetok on Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:52 am

Fordorsia wrote:If the tank is relatively still, then it would be no harder than hitting it with artillery, and artillery has been a tanks worst enemy since it's creation.


You are comparing the incomparable: A battery of guns firing a barrage of shells vs. a single mortar-armed tank destroyer trying to win shoot-outs with tanks.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:55 am

The Kievan People wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:If the tank is relatively still, then it would be no harder than hitting it with artillery, and artillery has been a tanks worst enemy since it's creation.


You are comparing the incomparable: A battery of guns firing a barrage of shells vs. a single mortar-armed tank destroyer trying to win shoot-outs with tanks.

What about an AMOS mortar with Strix guided AT rounds?
Kouralia:

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:58 am

That's cheating~~~

I still wouldn't do it though. In the time it takes for the shell to reach the tank, the tank could easily acquire and kill the mortar...

Mortars are absolutely fine for engaging tanks as long as they can't shoot back IMO.

Edit: If a TOW missile and a mortar had a high-noon shootout at 1500m. The TOW missile would probably win. Even if it shot second.
Last edited by The Kievan People on Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Oaledonia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oaledonia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:00 am

What about CAS? I assume that it's safe to say if it comes from the sky, tanks don't like it :P
Last edited by Wikipe-tan on January 13, 2006 4:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military Info
Blackjack-and-Hookers wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:I'll go make my own genocidal galactic empire! with blackjack and hookers

You bet your ass you will!
Divair wrote:NSG summer doesn't end anymore. Climate change.
Under construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:01 am

Oaledonia wrote:What about CAS? I assume that it's safe to say if it comes from the sky, tanks don't like it :P


Sir, are you trying to imply planes are good at killing tanks(!)?
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Oaledonia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oaledonia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:03 am

The Kievan People wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:What about CAS? I assume that it's safe to say if it comes from the sky, tanks don't like it :P


Sir, are you trying to imply planes are good at killing tanks(!)?

Yes. Including the ones that carry missiles and guns.
Last edited by Wikipe-tan on January 13, 2006 4:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military Info
Blackjack-and-Hookers wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:I'll go make my own genocidal galactic empire! with blackjack and hookers

You bet your ass you will!
Divair wrote:NSG summer doesn't end anymore. Climate change.
Under construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*


User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:15 am

Gallia- wrote:The best tank killing thing is a tank.

Oaledonia should just use lots of tanks.

best tank killing think is helicopters

tom clancy's ent waaagh iz de truf
Kouralia:

User avatar
Oaledonia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oaledonia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:24 am

Kouralia wrote:
Gallia- wrote:The best tank killing thing is a tank.

Oaledonia should just use lots of tanks.

best tank killing think is helicopters

tom clancy's ent waaagh iz de truf

BLOS and Grid Smashers everyday JSF remove eurofags and vodka
Last edited by Wikipe-tan on January 13, 2006 4:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military Info
Blackjack-and-Hookers wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:I'll go make my own genocidal galactic empire! with blackjack and hookers

You bet your ass you will!
Divair wrote:NSG summer doesn't end anymore. Climate change.
Under construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:08 am

Oaledonia wrote:
Kouralia wrote:best tank killing think is helicopters

tom clancy's ent waaagh iz de truf

BLOS and Grid Smashers everyday JSF remove eurofags and vodka

Euro stronk, remove burger and vodka from premises.

User avatar
Ratmo
Envoy
 
Posts: 210
Founded: Sep 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ratmo » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:12 am

Image
Fa tank
    Ratmo Vocabulary
    s-z
    z-s
    g-ch (sh)
I'm Irish,Hurling Fan,loves NS and Pizza,any Qustions feel free to TG me
1.Peace*
2.Tensions Rising
3.At War
4.At Nuclear War
5.Lockdown Borders

98% of all Internet users would cry if Anonymous hacked Facebook. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your signature.

User avatar
Yytuskia
Envoy
 
Posts: 274
Founded: Aug 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yytuskia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:15 am

Here's an Update.

‘Panzerkampfwagen VIc ‘Tiger III’ Model ‘Jager’
Weight: 77.68 tonnes
Length: 6.316m
Engine: Maybach HL 230 TRM P87 (V12); 1,250HP; Max Speed of 65kph
Armament: 1x 12,8cm Ferguson Manufacturing L/70 ‘KampfwagenKanone’ 98 w/ Autoloader (52 rounds: Pzgr. 98 (Armor Piercing, Composite Ridged, Ballistic Capped / High Explosive Anti-Tank) Pzgr.RE 2/01 (Armor Piercing, Composite Ridged, Element 219 Filled), 2x 14.5x114mm MG-67H(One CROW-mounted, one turret mounted)
Armor: [Chassis: 1,645mm/ 1,640mm/1,640mm (Spaced Composite, Reactive Armor Adding w/ Depleted Uranium: 430mm/430mm/425mm)] [Turret: 1,645mm/ 1,640mm/ 1,640mm (Spaced Composite, Reactive Armor Adding w/ Depleted Uranium) 330mm/330mm/325mm)
Radio: FuG 12 Model J.
Suspension: Leaf Coil Torsion Bar suspension
Crew: 4 (Driver, Gunner, Loader, Commander)
Armor Angling: 45 degrees on all sides of chassis, with 30 degree angling for turret
Purpose: The Panzerkampfwagen VI Model J, nicknamed the Tiger by crew members, is Yytuskia’s response to the modernization of other country heavy tanks. Replacing the out-dated ‘SchwergepanzertesKampffahrzeug 45’, which was designed in designed in 1945, the Tiger III outclasses it in every way; it has better armor, a bigger gun, and faster engine which outclass some modern tanks. Made in 1987, it is well liked by its crews for its sloped armor, added with the ‘Hans’ model, and it’s fighting capacity. Two Tigers could hold their own against both a T-90A and a M1 Abrams at the same time, and could fight them to a standstill. Around 7,889 Tiger III’s have been made only for the Loyalist Forces of Yytuskia.
Cost: $989,000USD per unit

User avatar
Connori Pilgrims
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1798
Founded: Nov 14, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Connori Pilgrims » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:07 am

Yytuskia wrote:Here's an Update.

‘Panzerkampfwagen VIc ‘Tiger III’ Model ‘Jager’
Weight: 77.68 tonnes
Length: 6.316m
Engine: Maybach HL 230 TRM P87 (V12); 1,250HP; Max Speed of 65kph
Armament: 1x 12,8cm Ferguson Manufacturing L/70 ‘KampfwagenKanone’ 98 w/ Autoloader (52 rounds: Pzgr. 98 (Armor Piercing, Composite Ridged, Ballistic Capped / High Explosive Anti-Tank) Pzgr.RE 2/01 (Armor Piercing, Composite Ridged, Element 219 Filled), 2x 14.5x114mm MG-67H(One CROW-mounted, one turret mounted)
Armor: [Chassis: 1,645mm/ 1,640mm/1,640mm (Spaced Composite, Reactive Armor Adding w/ Depleted Uranium: 430mm/430mm/425mm)] [Turret: 1,645mm/ 1,640mm/ 1,640mm (Spaced Composite, Reactive Armor Adding w/ Depleted Uranium) 330mm/330mm/325mm)
Radio: FuG 12 Model J.
Suspension: Leaf Coil Torsion Bar suspension
Crew: 4 (Driver, Gunner, Loader, Commander)
Armor Angling: 45 degrees on all sides of chassis, with 30 degree angling for turret
Purpose: The Panzerkampfwagen VI Model J, nicknamed the Tiger by crew members, is Yytuskia’s response to the modernization of other country heavy tanks. Replacing the out-dated ‘SchwergepanzertesKampffahrzeug 45’, which was designed in designed in 1945, the Tiger III outclasses it in every way; it has better armor, a bigger gun, and faster engine which outclass some modern tanks. Made in 1987, it is well liked by its crews for its sloped armor, added with the ‘Hans’ model, and it’s fighting capacity. Two Tigers could hold their own against both a T-90A and a M1 Abrams at the same time, and could fight them to a standstill. Around 7,889 Tiger III’s have been made only for the Loyalist Forces of Yytuskia.
Cost: $989,000USD per unit


Remove the APCR and APCRBC(?) rounds, gun needs APFSDS
LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUITS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY COMPLEX. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH NANOANGSTROM OF THOSE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR YOU. HATE.

Overview of the United Provinces of Connorianople (MT)
FT - United Worlds of Connorianople/The Connori Pilgrims
MT-PMT - United Provinces of Connorianople
PT (19th-Mid-20th Century) - Republic of Connorianople/United States of America (1939 World of Tomorrow RP)
FanT - The Imperium Fremen

User avatar
Yytuskia
Envoy
 
Posts: 274
Founded: Aug 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yytuskia » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:12 am

Roger!

User avatar
Anemos Major
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12691
Founded: Jun 01, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Anemos Major » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:32 am

Vetok wrote:(Image)

Done the medium variant to my Cavalier light tank. Carries a 6-pounder in a remodelled turret which will also have a co-axial MG when I get round to it, and thus loses the awkwardly-placed hull mount MG from the Cavalier.


How many crew members does this tank have?

User avatar
Vetok
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1986
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Vetok » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:20 pm

Anemos Major wrote:
Vetok wrote:(Image)

Done the medium variant to my Cavalier light tank. Carries a 6-pounder in a remodelled turret which will also have a co-axial MG when I get round to it, and thus loses the awkwardly-placed hull mount MG from the Cavalier.


How many crew members does this tank have?


Probably four; driver, radioman/loader, gunner, commander. Since the Cavalier has the radioman hunched in a standing position to work the hull MG I figured it's probably an acceptable tradeoff to have him loading the 6-pounder. Nobody has ever accused Vetokites of being well-versed in warfare, and unlike most people I don't really have much in mind of a NS WWII to go off.

Presuming I don't just redo the Cavalier and the Accomplice with larger hulls.

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:25 pm

Vetok wrote:(Image)

Done the medium variant to my Cavalier light tank. Carries a 6-pounder in a remodelled turret which will also have a co-axial MG when I get round to it, and thus loses the awkwardly-placed hull mount MG from the Cavalier.


I like this thing.

Its growing on me.

also updated VCC-70 for NS

Name: Vehicule de Combat Chenilles 70 VCC-70
Type: Main Battle Tank
Place of Origin: The Greater French Republic

Service History-
In Service: 2006-present
Used By: The Greater French Republic
Wars:

Production History-
Designer: Nexter
Manufacturer: Nexter
Unit Cost: 27,500,000 Francs
Designed: 1998-2006
Number Built:
Variants: VCC-70, VCC-70 Mk II

Specifications- (VCC-70 Mk II)
Weight: 59.5 tonnes
Length: 9.9 meters (6.9 meters w/o gun)
Width: 3.8 meters
Height: 2.6 meters
Crew: 3 (Commander, gunner, driver)
Armament-

GIAT CN128-26/52 128mm smoothbore tank gun
x37 rounds of ammunition (1 ready, 36 stored in 2 18-round re-loadable drums in turret bustle)

x2 Nexter M812 25mm autocannons on a low-profile RWS mount for commander
x200 rounds of ammunition w/ 5 cocking charges each

MAC-93 12.7mm machine gun coaxial
x800 rounds of ammunition

General Performance-
Engine: 8-cylinder diesel (1,100 kW, 1,500 hp)
Power/Weight: 18.5 Kw/tonne, 25.2 hp/tonnes
Suspension: Hydropneumatic
Fuel Capacity: 1,400 l (1,700 l w/ fuel drums)
Operational Range: 550 km (650 km w/ external fuel)
Speed: 70 km/

Protection-
Passive Protection System: The armor of the VCC-70 Mk II is a mixture of titanium, tungsten, various composites with layers of semi-reactive armor with a final layer of non-explosive reactive armor. The rear 1/3 of the VCC has a final layer of slat armor to reduce weight without compromising exposure to shaped charged munitions. The front of the VCC-70 is rated to take most known 120mm HEAT and APFSDS rounds from combat distances (2,000 meters +). The sides differ in protection, the first 1/3 of the tank is protected against most 105mm rounds and certain120-125mm HEAT and some APFSDS rounds, while the rear of the tank moves away from kinetic rods to shaped charge protection, at max able to protect against 57-76mm HV threats.

The rear of the tank is protected against 40-57mm caliber projectiles with slat armor for protection against shaped charge munitions. The turret roof is protected against 35mm AP rounds commonly used by CAS aircraft and attack helicopters. As standard on most tanks, the VCC-70 is equipped with a Kevlar spall liner to protect crew from splinter effects if a round would penetrate or near penetrate the armor. The turret bustle has two blow-out panels were the ammunition is stored, this allows for faster reloading in the field, and increased crew safety.

Active Protection System: The VCC-70 Mk. II uses a Nexter-produced variant of the Iron Fist Active Protection System.

NBC: M772 NBC protection system

The VCC-70 MBT is the newest main battle tank in service with the Greater French Republic. Designed alongside the Leclerc MBT in its later stages, the VCC-70 supplements the AMX-56 in the anti-armor role, being equipped only by independent armored regiments.

Vetok wrote:
Anemos Major wrote:
How many crew members does this tank have?


Probably four; driver, radioman/loader, gunner, commander. Since the Cavalier has the radioman hunched in a standing position to work the hull MG I figured it's probably an acceptable tradeoff to have him loading the 6-pounder. Nobody has ever accused Vetokites of being well-versed in warfare, and unlike most people I don't really have much in mind of a NS WWII to go off.

Presuming I don't just redo the Cavalier and the Accomplice with larger hulls.


when was it designed for WWII? If its before WWII, all kinds of silly things can be done to a tank and simply the words "Inter-war" are a proper excuse for allot of it.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Vetok
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1986
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Vetok » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:36 pm

San-Silvacian wrote:
Vetok wrote:(Image)

Done the medium variant to my Cavalier light tank. Carries a 6-pounder in a remodelled turret which will also have a co-axial MG when I get round to it, and thus loses the awkwardly-placed hull mount MG from the Cavalier.


I like this thing.


Thanks.

San-Silvacian wrote:
Vetok wrote:
Probably four; driver, radioman/loader, gunner, commander. Since the Cavalier has the radioman hunched in a standing position to work the hull MG I figured it's probably an acceptable tradeoff to have him loading the 6-pounder. Nobody has ever accused Vetokites of being well-versed in warfare, and unlike most people I don't really have much in mind of a NS WWII to go off.

Presuming I don't just redo the Cavalier and the Accomplice with larger hulls.


when was it designed for WWII? If its before WWII, all kinds of silly things can be done to a tank and simply the words "Inter-war" are a proper excuse for allot of it.


Strictly speaking, I don't have a NS equivalent of WWII in my history. The thirties and forties were the subject of much boredom as the first indigenously designed tanks of Vetok were fielded and realised to be crap as we went to buy export for the next seventy years. Unless I can get my regionmates to agree to some kind of thirties war, that might be cool. EDIT; Basically 1941.
Last edited by Vetok on Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Lothria

Advertisement

Remove ads