by Frisbeeteria » Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:16 pm
by Unibot III » Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:19 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Cerian Quilor » Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:48 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:00 pm
by Galiantus » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:06 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:A question from a telegram: "What sort of timeline will the summit threads follow? Is there a certain date by which you would like responses to be submitted by in each thread?"We're hoping that 2-3 days of response time for each batch of questions would be sufficient. We do understand that this is both a holiday period and end-of-term for school players, so we'll make every effort to be as flexible as we can regarding time constraints. If you're having timing constraints and you belong to an organization that has an interest in the summit, perhaps you can set up a consensus thread either here or at your off-site to make suggestions for your post. We want to give everyone a chance to be heard, but we also want to complete this fairly quickly, so please try your best to work with us.
Q: Do we have to post as commentary to someone else's summit agenda?Pretty much, yeah. As above, if you want to contribute to an organizational consensus thread, you can set one up here or off-site. You're welcome to use your political skills to attempt to shape the agenda through other Reps, but the official Rep posts will form the agenda.
Benjamin Franklin wrote:"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch."
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Unibot III » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:06 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Q: Do we have to post as commentary to someone else's summit agenda?Pretty much, yeah. As above, if you want to contribute to an organizational consensus thread, you can set one up here or off-site. You're welcome to use your political skills to attempt to shape the agenda through other Reps, but the official Rep posts will form the agenda.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Mahaj » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:18 pm
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Frisbeeteria » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:23 pm
Mahaj wrote:Fris, in an organizational specific thread, would we be able to use that to answer there the questions that were posed to the reps?
by Mahaj » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:24 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Mahaj wrote:Fris, in an organizational specific thread, would we be able to use that to answer there the questions that were posed to the reps?
If you're wanting to create a "Crafting the UDL answer to [Summit #2] thread", great. If you're looking for "Ask the UDL ...", use your Gameplay thread.
The only requirement I'm going to insist upon is that threads in the Summit forum remain exclusively about the summit. We all know the topics that are routinely beaten to death in Gameplay and Technical, and you're all welcome to continue beating those topics to death in those forums.
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Unibot III » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:26 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Frisbeeteria » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:36 pm
Unibot III wrote:what is the difference between this and us posting here, except exploding this sub-forum with more threads and unrepresenting individual views?
by Unibot III » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:41 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Unibot III wrote:what is the difference between this and us posting here, except exploding this sub-forum with more threads and unrepresenting individual views?
The difference between your organizational threads and the official threads is that we make no promises about reading the former. We've rented the hall and we don't mind you using it, but frankly we're going to be mostly paying attention to what's on the main stage.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Frisbeeteria » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:43 pm
by Unibot III » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:02 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Unibot, you've made it entirely too clear that you're unhappy with our selections, and that you think we've failed before we've started. You didn't get invited. We get it.
You've asked and been answered. I'm not going to continue to respond to the same question asked sixteen different ways.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Biyah » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:03 pm
by Ballotonia » Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:18 am
Unibot III wrote:the fact that "Regional Influence" was decided by a closed-off discussion club like this is very worryingly to me.
by Unibot III » Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:33 am
Ballotonia wrote:Unibot III wrote:the fact that "Regional Influence" was decided by a closed-off discussion club like this is very worryingly to me.
It wasn't. There was a discussion club which was debating Gameplay with the mods (I was one of the attendees at the time), and then Influence was put forth by Max and that was the end of all discussion taking place. Influence itself wasn't discussed, beyond me pointing out that the plan effectively legalized what was then known as 'region griefing'.
That was in a closed forum, with most of NS unaware it was even taking place. This is taking place very much out in the open. We just don't want everybody be talking at once, so actual participation is limited to selected attendees. Most people in NS are not selected attendees.
Ballotonia
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Unibot III » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:43 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Sedgistan » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:56 am
Unibot III wrote:EDIT: Wait is this thread really open to people? Fris's OP says "All posts by non-Reps will be removed, and offenders will be slapped with a large trout at the very least." I'm confused now. If we're not allowed to comment about posts, I'm sorry I thought this thread was open due to the title.
by Unibot III » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:48 am
Sedgistan wrote:Unibot III wrote:EDIT: Wait is this thread really open to people? Fris's OP says "All posts by non-Reps will be removed, and offenders will be slapped with a large trout at the very least." I'm confused now. If we're not allowed to comment about posts, I'm sorry I thought this thread was open due to the title.
It is open. The quoted sentence should be read after the one that comes before it.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Sedgistan » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:52 am
by Johz » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:58 am
by Unibot III » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:13 am
Sedgistan wrote:It means that if you're quoting a rep's post to reply to something they said, make sure you copy/paste that text into a reply to this thread, rather than accidently posting it in the reps-only thread.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Unibot III » Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:11 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Looking into the recent raid in the Eastern Islands of Dharma we can see that a single nation is capable of halting an operation being run by dozens of other players. Naturally a nation that has sat as delegate for a year in a region has earned protection to some degree, but for two months from thirty other players? Then comes the SC Liberation if we endure.
Jakker wrote:It took me so long in Dharma because I was using influence banjecting natives. That being said the sleepers in CP and Hippiedom were there for at least 3 months each where the CP sleeper had at least 20ish endorsements during that time, while the Hippiedom sleeper had at least 10 for the entire 6ish month stay. With Dharma though had I not used my influence at all, it would have taken me roughly 20-25 days to password.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Cerian Quilor » Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:32 am
Advertisement
Return to Gameplay "R/D" Summit
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement