by James Bluntus » Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:53 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:40 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:54 am
by Topid » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:37 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:It is technically possible, and having such column would, IMO, expose founderless regions in order for invader/defender alliances to spread to.
by EVIL BEYOND COMPARE » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:39 pm
by Fit battion » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:19 am
by Flibbleites » Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm
Fit battion wrote:Some founders might not feel they want to have their names shown for all the world to see.
by Unibotian WASC Mission » Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:06 pm
by Sioshar » Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:12 pm
Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:I'm confused at how showing the founders who voted on the resolution would reveal which regions are founderless. For example, of all 11,779 WA Members, 22% voted on the last resolution to vote, "Commend Anti World Assembly"1. I don't see how you could form an accurate topographic view of the founderless NationStates with 78% of the WA not participating in the vote at all, and as it is thats only 21% of all nations. In other words, how are raiders going to take advantage of having a list of founders who supported resolutions, when only 4% of NationStates is voting on resolutions?
With that being said, other than for budding historians and statisticians, who would benefit from this improvement?
*ADDED TO THE BIG LIST*
by Unibot » Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:16 pm
Sioshar wrote:Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:I'm confused at how showing the founders who voted on the resolution would reveal which regions are founderless. For example, of all 11,779 WA Members, 22% voted on the last resolution to vote, "Commend Anti World Assembly"1. I don't see how you could form an accurate topographic view of the founderless NationStates with 78% of the WA not participating in the vote at all, and as it is thats only 21% of all nations. In other words, how are raiders going to take advantage of having a list of founders who supported resolutions, when only 4% of NationStates is voting on resolutions?
With that being said, other than for budding historians and statisticians, who would benefit from this improvement?
*ADDED TO THE BIG LIST*
The OP said when searching in the world. He wasn't speaking about WA at all.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Neasmyrna » Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:40 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote: As founders aren't (typically) involved in these activities, listing them wouldn't do a lot of good.
by Topid » Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:41 pm
Unibot wrote:Sioshar wrote:Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:I'm confused at how showing the founders who voted on the resolution would reveal which regions are founderless. For example, of all 11,779 WA Members, 22% voted on the last resolution to vote, "Commend Anti World Assembly"1. I don't see how you could form an accurate topographic view of the founderless NationStates with 78% of the WA not participating in the vote at all, and as it is thats only 21% of all nations. In other words, how are raiders going to take advantage of having a list of founders who supported resolutions, when only 4% of NationStates is voting on resolutions?
With that being said, other than for budding historians and statisticians, who would benefit from this improvement?
*ADDED TO THE BIG LIST*
The OP said when searching in the world. He wasn't speaking about WA at all.
Gosh, do campaigners still use the World pages to find WA delegate contacts ?
I'll have to fix the list.
by Kalibarr » Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:57 am
Topid wrote:Unibot wrote:Sioshar wrote:Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:I'm confused at how showing the founders who voted on the resolution would reveal which regions are founderless. For example, of all 11,779 WA Members, 22% voted on the last resolution to vote, "Commend Anti World Assembly"1. I don't see how you could form an accurate topographic view of the founderless NationStates with 78% of the WA not participating in the vote at all, and as it is thats only 21% of all nations. In other words, how are raiders going to take advantage of having a list of founders who supported resolutions, when only 4% of NationStates is voting on resolutions?
With that being said, other than for budding historians and statisticians, who would benefit from this improvement?
*ADDED TO THE BIG LIST*
The OP said when searching in the world. He wasn't speaking about WA at all.
Gosh, do campaigners still use the World pages to find WA delegate contacts ?
I'll have to fix the list.
I use it when I campaign.
If founders are listed on the list of regions, the list can be sorted by population, and raiders could look for founderless regions about the size of their preffered prey in a matter of seconds.
The only reason to do this is to make one side's life easier, and the other side's life harder...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Improper Classifications
Advertisement