http://www.plantneurobiology.org/ecophysiology.php
there you're wrong, happy.
Advertisement
by Sociobiology » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:13 pm
by The USOT » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:13 pm
"the storm had swept...for seven days and seven nights" — Ziusudra 203
"For seven days and seven nights came the storm" — Atrahasis III,iv, 24
"Six days and seven nights the wind and storm" — Gilgamesh XI, 127
"rain fell upon the earth forty days and forty nights" — Genesis 7:12
"He offered a sacrifice" — Atrahasis III,v, 31
"And offered a sacrifice" — Gilgamesh XI, 155
"offered burnt offerings on the altar" — Genesis 8:20
"built an altar and sacrificed to the gods" — Berossus.
"The gods smelled the savor" — Atrahasis III,v,34
"The gods smelled the sweet savor" — Gilgamesh XI, 160
"And the Lord smelled the sweet savor..." — Genesis 8:21
by Todlichebujoku » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:13 pm
[violet] wrote:You are my go-to nation for long names.
Oct 16 2018- Indo States wrote:YOU'RE FALSE TOBU
Apr 21 2020- Llalta wrote:omg tobu you’ve literally given me asthma with ur art
by The Tiger Kingdom » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:13 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:We are required to suppose that two (and only two, one male and one female) of every land-based, sexually reproducing species present on the planet at the time was somehow preserved.
And in this we arrive at a serious problem: inbreeding. Inbreeding would be, as of the first generation of offspring, impossible to avoid since all members of that generation are directly related as brothers and sisters. The second generation of offspring, therefore, would begin a cycle of accumulation of deleterious recessive genes. This is especially problematic for your those species on the boat since the extremely low population makes them all endangered by default. Endangered species with extreme genetic uniformity are especially susceptible to environmental factors and therefore extremely vulnerable to extinction.
Now let's address the matter of water-based species. The fact of the matter is that there is a great diversity of ecological niches occupied by water-based species. A freshwater fish could not easily survive in brackish water, nor could a saltwater fish survive easily in a lake filled with freshwater. The species which would survive would have to be highly resistant to sudden fluctuations in water temperature, pH, and salinity. There's also the added problem for predatory and omnivorous species finding their prey in a significantly expanded environment (not to mention the problem for herbivorous species whose food supply has been killed by constantly harsh weather conditions and the absence of sunlight with which to carry out photosynthesis).
by Revolutopia » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:13 pm
Chinese Regions wrote:LogiChristianity wrote:No, I provided the facts in the OP. Which has facts in the footnotes.
Care to explain the inbreeding to restart humanity afterwards?
While you are at it, explain how Adam and Eve and their family managed it? Where did Cain and Abel get mates without doing some horrible incest with the only woman there was? Even if you count Adam's first Lilith partner (who was edited out the bible), five people is still not enough.
by San Leggera » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:14 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:North Franklin wrote:What did they all eat when they got off the ark? Flood kills vegetation=herbivores die=carnivores die=no life. This is obviously wrong, which makes me question the whole premise of the flood.
How do you know the flood would kill vegetation? Vegetation can survive underwater.
by Chinese Regions » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:14 pm
by LogiChristianity » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:14 pm
by Mavorpen » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:15 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:There's no solid proof that humans weren't around when Pangaea broke apart.
by Neo Art » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:15 pm
by Chinese Regions » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:15 pm
by Erinkita » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:There's no solid proof that humans weren't around when Pangaea broke apart.
by The Tiger Kingdom » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
by Northwest Slobovia » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:http://www.creationtips.com/arksize.htmlGenesis 6:15 in the Bible tells us the Ark's dimensions were at least 135 meters long (300 cubits), 22.5 meters wide (50 cubits), and 13.5 meters high (30 cubits). That's 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high! It could have been larger, because several larger-sized cubits were used. But the 45-centimeter (18-inch) cubit is long enough to show the enormous size of the Ark.
(A cubit was the length of a man's arm from fingertips to elbow.)
by Revolutopia » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:There's no solid proof that humans weren't around when Pangaea broke apart.
by Tlaceceyaya » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:There's no solid proof that humans weren't around when Pangaea broke apart.
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.
by LogiChristianity » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:We are required to suppose that two (and only two, one male and one female) of every land-based, sexually reproducing species present on the planet at the time was somehow preserved.
And in this we arrive at a serious problem: inbreeding. Inbreeding would be, as of the first generation of offspring, impossible to avoid since all members of that generation are directly related as brothers and sisters. The second generation of offspring, therefore, would begin a cycle of accumulation of deleterious recessive genes. This is especially problematic for those species on the boat since the extremely low population makes them all endangered by default. Endangered species with extreme genetic uniformity are especially susceptible to environmental factors and therefore extremely vulnerable to extinction.
Now let's address the matter of water-based species. The fact of the matter is that there is a great diversity of ecological niches occupied by water-based species. A freshwater fish could not easily survive in brackish water, nor could a saltwater fish survive easily in a lake filled with freshwater. The species which would survive would have to be highly resistant to sudden fluctuations in water temperature, pH, and salinity. There's also the added problem for predatory and omnivorous species finding their prey in a significantly expanded environment (not to mention the problem for herbivorous species whose food supply has been killed by constantly harsh weather conditions and the absence of sunlight with which to carry out photosynthesis).
by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
Chinese Regions wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Getting the whales in there must have been a right pain the arse...notwithstanding the creatures found at the bottom of the oceans at depths over several kilometres...
According to the OP the they didn't bring aquatic animals, if that were true most aquatic animals would be extinct.
by Omniscience » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
Chinese Regions wrote:LogiChristianity wrote:No, I provided the facts in the OP. Which has facts in the footnotes.
Care to explain the inbreeding to restart humanity afterwards?
While you are at it, explain how Adam and Eve and their family managed it? Where did Cain and Abel get mates without doing some horrible incest with the only woman there was? Even if you count Adam's first Lilith partner (who was edited out the bible), five people is still not enough.
by Northwest Slobovia » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:16 pm
by North Franklin » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:There's no solid proof that humans weren't around when Pangaea broke apart.
The House of Petain wrote:Souseiseki wrote:ban the firearms. all the firearms. - barack obama
Ah yes, I recall that speech. He then snorted some coke and said death to all the white people, while confessing how he was born in the sewers of Bangladesh and was a Buddhist hitman before becoming senator.
by The Tiger Kingdom » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm
LogiChristianity wrote:There's no solid proof that humans weren't around when Pangaea broke apart.
by Omniscience » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm
by Chinese Regions » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Dauchh Palki, Statesburg, Zurkerx
Advertisement