Advertisement
by Gregoryisgodistan » Sat May 09, 2015 4:17 pm
by Taeshan » Sat May 09, 2015 7:53 pm
by Eura » Sun May 10, 2015 11:28 am
Edit: Looking at teams which qualified last cycle, Tropicorp FC (Vilita), Trojana Condommakers FC (Quebec), Archbishop FC (Nova Anglicana), and Revolutionaries (Eura) all either are borderline, could be interpreted to have some ideological message, or have corporate sponsors. Not to mention a whole host of "Saint" teams that could either be religious or a place name, and there's not always sufficient context in the newswire post to show which one it is. So it's not just me who's doing this.
by Gregoryisgodistan » Sun May 10, 2015 1:29 pm
Eura wrote:Edit: Looking at teams which qualified last cycle, Tropicorp FC (Vilita), Trojana Condommakers FC (Quebec), Archbishop FC (Nova Anglicana), and Revolutionaries (Eura) all either are borderline, could be interpreted to have some ideological message, or have corporate sponsors. Not to mention a whole host of "Saint" teams that could either be religious or a place name, and there's not always sufficient context in the newswire post to show which one it is. So it's not just me who's doing this.
Greg I know you want your teams in with their current names but...sorry mate, these comparisons are just terrible. The reason your team names are banned is because they literally say "Fuck x country". There is nothing controversial about the existence of archbishops, a club founded by a company, or in the case of my club, a club named Revolutionaries because its from a city where revolutionary activity happened over a century ago and has zero IC offensive nature to anyone. Anyway. The comparison is a bit daft Yours are so blatantly different that the other examples don't merit comparison.
Shouldn't you just really accept that its remarkable that a nation of your nature is even allowed anywhere near international football or has the capacity to participate?
Commerce Heights wrote:The term “non-sporting nature” is not defined, but can reasonably be interpreted to include commercial, political, religious, or other ideological manifestations. Your interpretation is, as you admit, absurd. (Note that works teams, which are named after commercial entities on a permanent basis, not subject to a sponsorship contract, are permitted.)
by Commerce Heights » Sun May 10, 2015 4:10 pm
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:In short, ejection without warning or opportunity to switch the name seems rather harsh unless you're not going to apply it to any of the borderline cases that might ever come up.
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:I could see someone submitting a team with a more benign corporate sponsor without knowing the rules, particularly if they're new.
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:One more question - does the no offensive things policy also apply to corporate sponsors and/or stadiums bidding for the final?
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:Slaves R Us has a sponsor bid in right now
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:and two of our three site bids (Slavery Field and Death to Saintland Soccer Stadium) clearly are "non-sporting" in their name, while the third, Lord Almighty Gregory National Stadium, is more debatable. It's certainly political and religious, but those are presumably more forgivable in a stadium name than a team name, considering many RL stadiums are named after politicians.
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:Edit: Looking at teams which qualified last cycle, Tropicorp FC (Vilita), Trojana Condommakers FC (Quebec), Archbishop FC (Nova Anglicana), and Revolutionaries (Eura) all either are borderline, could be interpreted to have some ideological message, or have corporate sponsors. Not to mention a whole host of "Saint" teams that could either be religious or a place name, and there's not always sufficient context in the newswire post to show which one it is. So it's not just me who's doing this.
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:A team named after Archbishops could reasonably be understood to promote religious ideology. Teams named after corporations, like Tropicorp FC and Trojana Condommakers FC, clearly promote the commercial interests of those companies. As for Revolutionaries, there are certainly multiple possible meanings for such a team name, but which one you meant might not necessarily be clear to everyone. Heathen Killers FC could refer to the fact that they are based in a location where heathens were killed a century ago. It doesn't, but it could. And Revolutionaries could refer to a desire to overthrow the government, rather than being a historical reference. It doesn't, but it could.
If all Commerce Heights meant to say is that names shouldn't be offensive or threatening, that's fine. But he should have said that, rather than creating a policy that is far too broad. That was my concern. I wasn't actually arguing that those team names were inappropriate, only that the policy was too broad.
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:There are too many borderline cases, both in my own nation and other nations
by Gregoryisgodistan » Sun May 10, 2015 4:55 pm
by Apox » Sun May 10, 2015 5:05 pm
by Nephara » Sun May 10, 2015 5:30 pm
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:So, for future reference, is Heathen Killers FC acceptable if they ever qualify, seeing as it doesn't state anything and revolutionaries generally kill people too?
by Gregoryisgodistan » Sun May 10, 2015 5:47 pm
Nephara wrote:Gregoryisgodistan wrote:So, for future reference, is Heathen Killers FC acceptable if they ever qualify, seeing as it doesn't state anything and revolutionaries generally kill people too?
This is a bit like saying that Arsenal shouldn't be allowed to qualify for UEFA tournaments because it refers to guns. There's a significant tonal difference between Revolutionaries and Heathen Killers. You're just being pedantic.
by Eura » Mon May 11, 2015 6:46 am
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:Nephara wrote:This is a bit like saying that Arsenal shouldn't be allowed to qualify for UEFA tournaments because it refers to guns. There's a significant tonal difference between Revolutionaries and Heathen Killers. You're just being pedantic.
One man's terrorists are another man's revolutionaries.... But I'll change it for UICA, which I was planning to do anyway before that last post. They will be known as Happy Koala FC if they qualify for SBCC (or perhaps GC/CC eventually.)
by Mangolana » Wed May 13, 2015 1:04 pm
by Audioslavia » Thu May 14, 2015 3:40 pm
by Kernansquillec » Fri May 15, 2015 10:53 am
by Polkopia » Mon May 18, 2015 10:13 am
by Eastfield Lodge » Mon May 18, 2015 10:25 am
Polkopia wrote:Quick question:
I had made a post earlier here regarding the results of my domestic league, where I had one qualifier to the Champion Cup and three for the Globe Cup, however,in the recent post regarding the Champion Cup and the Globe Cup, it seems my clubs have been left out. Any particular reason for this? I'm rather new to the domestic leagues, so I might just be missing something, I'm just curious. Thanks
by Polkopia » Mon May 18, 2015 10:36 am
Eastfield Lodge wrote:Polkopia wrote:Quick question:
I had made a post earlier here regarding the results of my domestic league, where I had one qualifier to the Champion Cup and three for the Globe Cup, however,in the recent post regarding the Champion Cup and the Globe Cup, it seems my clubs have been left out. Any particular reason for this? I'm rather new to the domestic leagues, so I might just be missing something, I'm just curious. Thanks
Basically, whenever you submit teams to the competitions, you need to include a box like in this post.
The actual reason was never stated, but I feel it's mainly for CH's purposes, so he can quickly scan the thread from the last tournament and see the qualifiers, instead of having to go through every post with a fine comb.
Just remember to do that in future, and you should be fine. As for this cycle, it's up to CH if he wants to add the teams (and re-do the draw) or not, probably also depends on when he comes on and sees this.
by Ceni » Wed May 20, 2015 2:19 pm
by Commerce Heights » Wed May 20, 2015 4:37 pm
Eastfield Lodge wrote:Polkopia wrote:Quick question:
I had made a post earlier here regarding the results of my domestic league, where I had one qualifier to the Champion Cup and three for the Globe Cup, however,in the recent post regarding the Champion Cup and the Globe Cup, it seems my clubs have been left out. Any particular reason for this? I'm rather new to the domestic leagues, so I might just be missing something, I'm just curious. Thanks
Basically, whenever you submit teams to the competitions, you need to include a box like in this post.
The actual reason was never stated, but I feel it's mainly for CH's purposes, so he can quickly scan the thread from the last tournament and see the qualifiers, instead of having to go through every post with a fine comb.
Just remember to do that in future, and you should be fine. As for this cycle, it's up to CH if he wants to add the teams (and re-do the draw) or not, probably also depends on when he comes on and sees this.
by Polkopia » Wed May 20, 2015 10:41 pm
Commerce Heights wrote:Eastfield Lodge wrote:Basically, whenever you submit teams to the competitions, you need to include a box like in this post.
The actual reason was never stated, but I feel it's mainly for CH's purposes, so he can quickly scan the thread from the last tournament and see the qualifiers, instead of having to go through every post with a fine comb.
Just remember to do that in future, and you should be fine. As for this cycle, it's up to CH if he wants to add the teams (and re-do the draw) or not, probably also depends on when he comes on and sees this.
The original reason for standardizing the entry format was to avoid precisely that scenario, where I would have to redraw the competitions after finding out that I’d missed someone’s entry. While I do still try to spot posts like Polkopia’s, I can’t guarantee that I’ll find them, and I won’t do a redraw if I miss them.
by Ceni » Thu May 21, 2015 9:09 am
by 95X » Sat May 23, 2015 3:06 pm
Nation not my RL views, etc.
Poe's Law. Nonpartisan.
by Audioslavia » Mon May 25, 2015 5:14 pm
Cristóbal Bustos 32 M AUD La Nueva Avenida FFD
Martin Connor 35 M DM AUD Morponte Fied COS
Willem Van Mehrtens 32 M CM AUD Springs FC NOV
Claudio Redondo 33 D CB AUD FC St. Martin NOV
Cillian Najdorf 34 G AUD Rozelle United NPH
Hufdis UULVER 30 F AUD Thunchester City NSI
Mixu Kohelmainnen 31 F AUD CA Paulinthal PAS
Tiro ZEHATZENA 33 F AUD Galactica PAS
Xurxo-Luis Luminez 33 M AUD Tanrisal PAS
Paul KAIDLER 37 M AUD HellenicRouge PAS
Kjeld-Dahl Johanssen 32 M AUD RSK Longyearbyen Town PIS
Cameron Rivor 38 D AUD Koreana Montreal QUE
Endika Vivas 36 D AUD Gorgona City SAR
Alessandro Romà 38 D AUD Sporting Matrolvik SEM
Tòmas Cardona 39 D AUD Eikbork Club SEM
Maati Jarvinen 37 M AUD Alianza FC SJG
Ultan MALFEEV 32 D AUD Mierton Manatees TAE
Callum STONE 34 M AUD Laketown FC TAE
Jason Voor 36 M RM AUD FC Chippenham TSA
Lorenc PETIT 34 M AUD Mar Sara VAL
Arne Polsson 36 D AUD Jlinal Cove VIL
Marc Murdoch 43 D AUD Novus GLX
Basajaun Andreu 40 D AUD North Rathia BRE
Adam Little 40 M AUD Rozelle United BRE
Vitor Belmonte 40 D AUD SWU FC MBT
Luca Mancini 43 D AUD Mar Sara VAL
by Chiata » Tue May 26, 2015 1:21 pm
by Ceni » Wed May 27, 2015 7:30 pm
by Northern Sunrise Islands » Thu May 28, 2015 7:32 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement