by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:12 am
by Philimbesi » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:47 am
Should the Nation in question feel that the award dictated by this formula is in excess they may appeal to the ICC for a ruling.
by Manticore Reborn » Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:19 am
The Ainocran Embassy wrote:Recognizing that justice in criminal matters does not always move swiftly and can result in individuals being wrongly convicted of crimes.
Realizing that many convictions are later overturned for reasons including, but not limited to, new evidence and/or witnesses, or new methodology, after the accused has spent time incarcerated.
Noting that in many cases the individuals suffer massive financial, mental and social hardships
Requiring that all persons who are vindicated of a crime in such a fashion have their records completely expunged of the incident by the convicting governments.
Further mandates full restoration of all rights and privileges that would have normally been accorded them.
Stipulates a minimum amount of financial restitution be made to any victim of wrongful imprisonment and conviction by a government.
A) If the victim were not employed at the time of arrest, financial restitution should be granted at an equivalent rate of seventy five percent of a median wage in their country for each year plus a five percent cost of living increase per year of incarceration
B) If the victim was employed at the time of arrest, financial restitution should be granted at an equivalent rate of seventy five percent of their annual wage plus a five percent cost of living increase per year of incarceration unless such compensation would be less than that stipulated in clause A in which case financial restitution should be granted in compliance with clause A.
Declares that victims shall have the right to seek punitive compensation according to the civil legal codes of their nation.
Recommends that should a person perish in state custody and is exonerated post-mortem, that restitution either be:
a) Given and distributed by the Estate Trustee either with or without a will as per domestic law governing estates or
b) Given to the family who shall determine the distribution of the restitution based on local customs and/or religious traditions.
by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:21 am
Philimbesi wrote:Should the Nation in question feel that the award dictated by this formula is in excess they may appeal to the ICC for a ruling.
Isn't that essentially bringing a civil matter to a criminal court?
by Philimbesi » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:24 am
by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:38 am
by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:42 am
Philimbesi wrote:How is the wrongful incarceration for a murder committed by one of my citizens in my nation a matter for the ICC? I think the clause about using the ICC to settle disputes over the amount of reparations is a bit out of left field.
If it were removed, and the minimum reparations were replaced with "a reasonable sum", or something that allows reasonable nations to set the reparations within their borders this would have my support.
by Philimbesi » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:49 am
by Ainocra » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:52 am
Philimbesi wrote:Except that again the ICC was created to prosecute international criminals, not negotiate settlements with nations who disagree on International Law. In fact Genocide, War Crimes, and Crimes against Humanity are the only thing it's charged with prosecuting.
Certainly the amount of reparations a nation pays a person wrongfully accused of petty theft isn't a matter for an international court.
by Philimbesi » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:45 am
by Sionis Prioratus » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:03 am
by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:24 am
by Sionis Prioratus » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:30 am
by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:48 am
Sionis Prioratus wrote:OOC: I'd like that the operative clauses were numbered, it makes for more efficient debate
by The Ainocran Embassy » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:04 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:13 am
6)
Establishes the International Restitution Committee to oversee the Reparation process.
A) Grants the nation the option to appeal the damage awarded on a case by case basis to the IRC
B) Empowers the IRC to determine if restitution amounts are indeed a reasonable sum
C) Grants the IRC broad authority to modify restitution amounts when it finds that an unreasonable sum has been granted.
D) Instructs the IRC to hear all cases in a timely manner.
by Philimbesi » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:18 am
I think the International Restitution Committee could be a branch of the ICC, which already exists. Such move would make management a little easier.
by Grays Harbor » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:24 am
by Manticore Reborn » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:49 am
The Ainocran Embassy wrote:Reparations for the Wrongly Convicted
Social Justice
Medium1)
Recognizing that as the wheels of justice turn sometimes the innocent are wrongly convicted of crimes.
Realizing that many sentences are later overturned for various reasons such as new evidence, witnesses, or new methodology but only after the accused has spent time incarcerated.
Noting that in most cases the individual suffers massive financial mental and social hardship or is rendered indigent by these circumstances and their records are tainted by these accusations for years to come.
The Ainocran Embassy wrote:21) REQUIRES that all persons who are vindicated of a crime in such a fashion have their records completely expunged of the incident by their respective governments.32) MANDATES full restoration of all rights and privileges that would have normally been accorded them.43) DECLARES that a minimumamount offinancial restitution must be made to any victim of wrongful imprisonment and conviction by a government.
a) If the victim were not employed at the time of arrest, financial restitution should be granted at an equivalent rate of seventy five percent of a median wage in their country for each year plus a five percent cost of living increase per year of incarceration
b) If the victim was employed at the time of arrest, financial restitution should be granted at an equivalent rate of seventy five percent of their annual wage plus a five percent cost of living increase per year of incarceration unless such compensation would be less than that stipulated in clause a in which case financial restitution should be granted in compliance with clause a.5) Notes that these standards are only the minimum and nations are always free to enact laws granting greater restitution should they deem it necessary or desirable.
The Ainocran Embassy wrote:6)
Establishes the International Restitution Committee to oversee the Reparation process.
A) Grants the nation the option to appeal the damage awarded on a case by case basis to the IRC
B) Empowers the IRC to determine if restitution amounts are indeed a reasonable sum
C) Grants the IRC broad authority to modify restitution amounts when it finds that an unreasonable sum has been granted.
D) Instructs the IRC to hear all cases in a timely manner.
The Ainocran Embassy wrote:75) Declares that nothing in this resolution shall prevent victims from having the right to seek punitive compensation according to the civil legal codes of their nation.
The Ainocran Embassy wrote:86) REQUIRES that in the event a wrongly convicted individual should perish in state custody and is exonerated post-mortem, that restitution as defined in this resolution either be:
a) Given and distributed by the Estate Trustee either with or without a will as per domestic law governing estates or
b) Given to the family who shall determine the distribution of the restitution based on local customs and/or religious traditions.
by The Ainocran Embassy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:28 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:6)
Establishes the International Restitution Committee to oversee the Reparation process.
A) Grants the nation the option to appeal the damage awarded on a case by case basis to the IRC
B) Empowers the IRC to determine if restitution amounts are indeed a reasonable sum
C) Grants the IRC broad authority to modify restitution amounts when it finds that an unreasonable sum has been granted.
D) Instructs the IRC to hear all cases in a timely manner.
I think the International Restitution Committee could be a branch of the ICC, which already exists. Such move would make management a little easier.
by The Ainocran Embassy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:04 am
Philimbesi wrote:I agree with you that the gnomes are not the way to decide this. Relying on the decency of the majority of this body and not hamstringing them because of a few irresponsible nations that MAY (or may not) loophole the law is the better way to go, and that is why we feel minimums are a bad idea and a deal breaker for the USP.
by Philimbesi » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:05 am
REQUIRES that any wages or social welfare lost during the time of incarceration, or, if both are not applicable, a reasonable amount arrived at by negotiation, be made in any case of wrongful conviction and imprisonment by a government.
REQUIRES that any wage or welfare restitution amount be adjusted for the normal cost of living increases for the time of incarceration.
PERMITS those wrongfully incarcerated to bring civil litigation against the government seeking an higher amount of restitution.
by The Ainocran Embassy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:20 am
by Philimbesi » Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:29 am
by Manticore Reborn » Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:29 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement