Advertisement
by Aden Protectorate » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:40 pm
by The Dark Star Republic » Tue Apr 01, 2014 4:17 pm
Aden Protectorate wrote:Just a question are resolution titles capped at 30? Or some other number cap?
by Aden Protectorate » Tue Apr 01, 2014 4:17 pm
by Applebania » Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:21 pm
by Ardchoille » Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:06 am
The ambassadors and observers to the NationStates World Assembly:
Laboring to pay attention after lengthy drinking binges last night at a well-known local pub (which, for purposes of this resolution, and for liability reasons, cannot be named);
by Nucoclan » Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:27 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:43 pm
Goddess Relief Office wrote:"We agree with Ambassador Bell's point that you should spend more time drafting and participating in debates. Don't be too hasty in submitting 5 day old proposals. Give it time and keep rewriting. "
by Ardchoille » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:53 pm
Nucoclan wrote:What should I put in [edit]my proposal[/edit] to make it to possible Quorum?<snip>
by Nucoclan » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:03 pm
Ardchoille wrote:This thread is not for advertising proposals. Ask specific questions, such as queries about interpretation, legality or procedure.
by Former United Soviet Socialist republic » Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:22 am
by Abacathea » Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:48 am
Former United Soviet Socialist republic wrote:I know this sounds stupid, but where is the repeal category? I can't find it.
by SkyDip » Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:58 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by The Dark Star Republic » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:08 am
SkyDip wrote:I seem to recall seeing a list of passed resolutions by author. Can anyone direct me to that,
answer the following question: "How many GA authors have passed 10+ proposals?" Thank you!
by Mousebumples » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:18 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:SkyDip wrote:I seem to recall seeing a list of passed resolutions by author. Can anyone direct me to that,
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=237455answer the following question: "How many GA authors have passed 10+ proposals?" Thank you!
Depends how you count them. Do you group Connopolis and Sciongrad together? Do Mousebumples's various co-authorships count? Does this include NSUN resolutions?
Glen-Rhodes once referred to such accounting as a "dick-waving contest". I'm inclined to agree.
by SkyDip » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:49 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=237455
The Dark Star Republic wrote:Depends how you count them. Do you group Connopolis and Sciongrad together? Do Mousebumples's various co-authorships count? Does this include NSUN resolutions?
Glen-Rhodes once referred to such accounting as a "dick-waving contest". I'm inclined to agree.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Wrapper » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:55 am
SkyDip wrote:I'm not here to...erm, wave any dicks.
by SkyDip » Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:01 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Former United Soviet Socialist republic » Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:25 am
Abacathea wrote:Former United Soviet Socialist republic wrote:I know this sounds stupid, but where is the repeal category? I can't find it.
Hey
It's not a category in the same sense as the others.
Generally you get your draft ready before, and then when you're ready to go, find the resolution in question and use the link "repeal this resolution" that'll be on the bottom of it.
I'd advise doing up a draft on the forums and getting the feedback of the regulars first before hitting the above stage though!
Hope this helps,
Aba.
by Elke and Elba » Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:39 am
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by The Dark Star Republic » Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:51 am
Elke and Elba wrote:I have one question though: how can it be ascertained that another state hasn't, malevolently changed the wiki definition to suit what was defined in the GA proposal, in order to frame someone of plagiarism to lose his WA rights of that state?
by Elke and Elba » Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:01 am
The Dark Star Republic, emphasis mine wrote:Elke and Elba wrote:I have one question though: how can it be ascertained that another state hasn't, malevolently changed the wiki definition to suit what was defined in the GA proposal, in order to frame someone of plagiarism to lose his WA rights of that state?
Even in NS, no one would be that petty.
More practically, wikis have public edit histories.
Also, I'm confused as to what the "Discussion" thread is for, if this thread is also to be used for discussing rulings.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Ardchoille » Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:27 am
by Elke and Elba » Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:33 am
Ardchoille wrote:The ruling allowing dictionary definitions was withdrawn.
This thread isn't for rehashing arguments about the rulings, but if there's anything that's been linked that players think shouldn't be included (eg, doesn't add much, not as clear as/duplicates some other version), or any queries about apparent discrepancies, posting here would be helpful.
Ard wrote:We don't want players changing Wiki to win arguments on NS, as has already happened in another NS forum.
Elke and Elba wrote:How can it be ascertained that another state hasn't, malevolently changed the wiki definition to suit what was defined in the GA proposal, in order to frame someone of plagiarism to lose his WA rights of that state?
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Ardchoille » Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:02 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement