Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:15 pmAraraukar wrote:Helaw wrote:Note: This involves rebranding the proposal as a whole. Much of this discussion becomes obsolete, but it was intended to improve the draft rather than debate the merits of it. Would a new thread be a better place for such a thing?
OOC: Only keep this thread as is, if you mean to continue pursuing the current direction. You can post an entirely new draft in this thread (remember to change thread title too by editing title of first post), but also post a new one, change this one's title to read "abandoned" and if people still come to it to argue, ask the mods to lock (usually that's not needed) it.
OOC: Hmm. I would appreciate your thoughts on the draft in this new thread then with the new direction, if you are willing. It is interesting to see how much this draft has evolved.