by The Pandarian Order » Sun Jul 24, 2016 6:33 pm
by Normlpeople » Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:00 pm
by The Pandarian Order » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:00 am
Normlpeople wrote:OOC: Welcome to the snakepit! Read the stickies, dont take anything said IC personally, and enjoy your stay!
IC: "I guess my first question is" Clover asked "How is this an international issue? How does it affect your nation if I allow my citizens to purchase explosives?"
by Bears Armed » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:57 am
2. Defines low, medium, and high damage as 100-500m/s explosive velocity, 501-1000m/s explosive velocity, and 1+km/h explosive velocity respectively,
by The Pandarian Order » Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:06 am
Bears Armed wrote:2. Defines low, medium, and high damage as 100-500m/s explosive velocity, 501-1000m/s explosive velocity, and 1+km/h explosive velocity respectively,
Presumably you meant "/s" not "/h" on the last of those?
Also, fireworks?
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:45 am
The Pandarian Order wrote:Normlpeople wrote:OOC: Welcome to the snakepit! Read the stickies, dont take anything said IC personally, and enjoy your stay!
IC: "I guess my first question is" Clover asked "How is this an international issue? How does it affect your nation if I allow my citizens to purchase explosives?"
OOC: Thanks! A little RP won't hurt me .
IC: "The primary reason for the drafting of this proposal is to counter seeing unnecessary deaths which could have easily been prevented by some little regulation and keeping track of explosives. While this resolution does not impact inter-national relations significantly, it does generally improve the lives of the people within the GA, as most sentient beings enjoy a prolonged life which they do not desire to be cut short by unaccounted explosives. Looking over the draft again, I believe Operative 6 is the most important one, as post-war casualties to unexploded ordinance are still severe and deadly when accidentally triggered. This draft would at least ensure that there aren't any needless deaths in public areas. Perhaps a future resolution can be drafted regarding unexploded ordinance in general (eg former battle sites, rural landscapes, etc. ), but this draft targets populated public settings specifically." I hope this clarifies some concerns over the reason and purpose behind the draft. Any further critique, recommendations, and edits are welcomed!
by Grays Harbor » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:06 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:45 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Y'all realize explosive substances are useful for things other than terrorists … right? Tunnels, road building, mining, stump removal, building demolition, a d those are but a few off the top of my head.
Perhaps a little thought before using the wide brush to ban things, eh?
by Tinfect » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:44 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Y'all realize explosive substances are useful for things other than terrorists … right? Tunnels, road building, mining, stump removal, building demolition, a d those are but a few off the top of my head.
Perhaps a little thought before using the wide brush to ban things, eh?
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:18 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:"Hornet nest removal, entertainment, garbage disposal, dispersal of agricultural products, gopher removal..."
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:49 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:"Hornet nest removal, entertainment, garbage disposal, dispersal of agricultural products, gopher removal..."
PARSONS: I know the the party and I, when we were transversing the Amazonian river on expedition, dropped charges in the river to not get eaten alive by the piranhas.
by Dooom35796821595 » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:45 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:48 am
Dooom35796821595 wrote:We have objection with the requirement to use a specific from of weight measurement in a citizens total explosive ownership, since other nations may have different measurement systems.
by Unified Heartless States » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:49 am
Dooom35796821595 wrote:We have objection with the requirement to use a specific from of weight measurement in a citizens total explosive ownership, since other nations may have different measurement systems.
by Falcania » Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:14 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement