[DRAFT] Proper Execution Act

[New Dukaine]

Everyone is making Drafts about this. Why can't I?

On Proper execution
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant

The World assembly,

Noting that most member nations abide to this organization have capital punishment legal in some, most, or even all cases;

Recognizing that some nations can easily execute anyone without proper legislation on this issue;

Perplexed by the fact that member nations have legalized the death penalty for small, petty crimes, like littering, and don't give those citizens fair trials for these crimes;

Seeing that with the proper legislation, all member nations can have the death penalty in [certain] circumstances,

Hereby declares:

1. That when citizens commit a crime, they are not executed on sight,

2. Clarifies that abuse of the death penalty is not the vision of thus resolution

3. When a person gets the death penalty, member nations must agree to give the criminal a fast and swift death.

and 4. A citizen may not be executed for minor or medium-scale offenses on his or her criminal record.

It's a doozy right now, there might be metagaming and it needs some work. Please give me suggestions below!

Change log

Deleted clauses 2 and 3 and replaced them
Blanked out like a toxic chemical
Changed title

[Kaboomlandia]

I see duplication of GAR #37. Those accused of crimes already get a fair trial. Clause 3 is completely unnecessary - sentencing is already part of a trial.

[New Dukaine]

I see duplication of GAR #37. Those accused of crimes already get a fair trial. Clause 3 is completely unnecessary - sentencing is already part of a trial.

I have replaced clause 2 and 3

[Imperium Anglorum]

#liketoxicchemical

[New Dukaine]

#liketoxicchemical

Should I blank that?

[New Dukaine]

Bump

[Imperium Anglorum]

In real life, I have a great doubt of whether such things a lethal injection really are as painless as the government claims, something which came up really after the European ban on the sale of the choice drugs for execution purposes. A statement that painless methods are what ought be used is probably necessary here, though that is up to you on how far you want that to go.

However, I will vote against anything that is 'On [x]'. This is an Assembly, not an essay convention.

[New Dukaine]

In real life, I have a great doubt of whether such things a lethal injection really are as painless as the government claims, something which came up really after the European ban on the sale of the choice drugs for execution purposes. A statement that painless methods are what ought be used is probably necessary here, though that is up to you on how far you want that to go.

However, I will vote against anything that is 'On [x]'. This is an Assembly, not an essay convention.

I see your point on the title, and I have switched it to "act"

Sometimes it's basically like being euthanized but when you aren't about to die. That's basically what my state does on execution.

[Westercourt]

The Crime and Punishment Act is only 14 approvals away from reaching quorum, and is a lot more comprehensive and written better. I don't see the need for another draft on this.