Bananaistan wrote:OOC: How did you send the TG to delegates?
Manually.
Advertisement
by Bananaistan » Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:42 am
by Wrapper » Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:45 am
by Umeria » Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:26 am
Kaboomlandia wrote:Who should I campaign?
Ideally, the best delegates to send your telegram to are the delegates of the big regions that will have a lot of pull in the WA. Many delegates vote early, causing what is known as the "lemming effect", in which latecomers to the voting table jump on the bandwagon and vote for the majority.
Good regions to send it to are:
- The feeders: The Pacific, The North Pacific, The South Pacific, The West Pacific, The East Pacific
- The sinkers: Osiris, Lazarus, Balder
- The Rejected Realms
- Large user-created regions: Europeia, 10000 Islands, The Communist Bloc
by Bananaistan » Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:44 am
If you want to reach a large number of nations without buying stamps, you can send the same message over and over, addressing it to eight or fewer nations at a time. This is more time-consuming, but less money-consuming. Please use a Telegram Template, which makes the process faster, less error-prone, and provides Delivery Reports. To do this, first register a template by sending your telegram to "tag:template" and use the special code it gives you to send copies to other nations.
by Wrapper » Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:57 am
by Araraukar » Tue Aug 23, 2016 10:25 am
Umeria wrote:*snip*
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Umeria » Tue Aug 23, 2016 10:50 am
Araraukar wrote:Umeria wrote:*snip*
OOC: Oh sweetie, you should've said you had no idea how to campaign. I thought you only didn't know the methods to send them.
Those big regions listed on that thread are for when you have quorum and are trying to get votes from the high-endorsement delegates.
To get approvals, which you need to get your proposal to vote, you probably need to send hundreds of TGs to get even a small portion of delegates to approve them.
by Hannasea » Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:17 am
by Wrapper » Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:19 am
by Araraukar » Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:31 am
Hannasea wrote:You might even be better off waiting a few days more, so as to reduce delegate fatigue.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by WA Kitty Kops » Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:27 pm
NERVUN wrote:And my life flashed in front of my eyes while I did and I honestly expected my computer to explode after I entered the warning.
by Imperium Anglorum » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:57 am
by Umeria » Wed Aug 24, 2016 7:41 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Araraukar wrote:OOC: Or even until IA gets back, if he was originally going to help run the campaign.
I am going to help, when I get back. Unfortunately, this just happened to be when I am on holiday. To run a campaign, you need around 13 hours of uninterrupted Internet time. I don't have that out here in a foreign nation.
by Imperium Anglorum » Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:14 am
Umeria wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:I am going to help, when I get back. Unfortunately, this just happened to be when I am on holiday. To run a campaign, you need around 13 hours of uninterrupted Internet time. I don't have that out here in a foreign nation.
13 hours?? How does anyone get anything passed?
by Araraukar » Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:24 am
Umeria wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:I am going to help, when I get back. Unfortunately, this just happened to be when I am on holiday. To run a campaign, you need around 13 hours of uninterrupted Internet time. I don't have that out here in a foreign nation.
13 hours?? How does anyone get anything passed?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Cogoria » Wed Aug 24, 2016 9:05 am
rendering the infected person non-contagious;
ensuring the infected person does not undergo any unnecessary harm
provide every treatment to all infected persons that are in a quarantine while taking any available precaution to ensure that the people administering these treatments are not infected;
by Umeria » Wed Aug 24, 2016 9:38 am
Cogoria wrote:If this goes through I'm going to approve it, simply cause I can cleanse any infection with gunfire flmethrowers and a healthy dose of explosives.
Cogoria wrote:And surely letting people with an incurable contagious disease live on suffering in agony would be undue harm.
Cogoria wrote:also this one reads as if I'm to give an infected person EVERY treatment under the sun
Cogoria wrote:Probably best to give them the treatment for the disease they actually have.
Cogoria wrote:My precaution is my soldiers will shoot them from really far away,
Cogoria wrote:or my doctors can shout encouragement and instructions through speakers while my planes airdrop medical equipment in.
Cogoria wrote:and your proposal would make it perfectly legal
by Kryozerkia » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:16 am
Cogoria wrote:If this goes through I'm going to approve it, simply cause I can cleanse any infection with gunfire flmethrowers and a healthy dose of explosives.
[...]
I'd say gunfire and burning the bodies would render them uncontagious. And surely letting people with an incurable contagious disease live on suffering in agony would be undue harm. SEND IN THE TROOPS!
[...]
My precaution is my soldiers will shoot them from really far away, or my doctors can shout encouragement and instructions through speakers while my planes airdrop medical equipment in.
[...]
OOC: It's a good proposal, I'm just saying how a dictatorship like mine would use it. It'd be easier to kill the infected for my economy then charge EPARC for the cost of the bullets and flamethrower fuel, and your proposal would make it perfectly legal
by Cogoria » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:31 am
by Kryozerkia » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:35 am
Cogoria wrote:Well The Cogorian government would still strongly feel purging all infected persons would be a necessary harm, to end their suffering, and render them noncontagious. Unnecessary harm seems vague, who determines what is necessary? The patient or the Government?
by Cogoria » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:38 am
by Calladan » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:39 am
Cogoria wrote:Well The Cogorian government would still strongly feel purging all infected persons would be a necessary harm, to end their suffering, and render them noncontagious. Unnecessary harm seems vague, who determines what is necessary? The patient or the Government?
by Cogoria » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:49 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement