NATION

PASSWORD

[WITHDRAWN] Ban on Variety-Level Genetic Use Restriction

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

[WITHDRAWN] Ban on Variety-Level Genetic Use Restriction

Postby A Humanist Science » Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:13 pm

The Federation of A Humanist Science presents the following draft proposal as a potential alternative for its previous "Fair Use of GMOs."

The proposal takes a different approach by banning the use of only one kind of genetic use restriction technology (GURT) -- the one which actually prevents seed saving. The second kind of GURT remains untouched, allowing GMO producers to continuing using it as a means of recuperating the cost of research and development.

The intended effect is thus to protect subsistance farmers -- and their ability to save seed and trade their produce -- without compromising the commercial interests of GMO producers.

Ban on Variety-Level Genetic Use Restriction
Category: Free Trade | Strength: Mild


THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

SADDENED by the continued struggle of many of the poor to secure sufficient and affordable daily nutrition;

RECOGNIZING the potential of genetically modified organism (GMO) technologies to provide for more blight-resistant and nutritious crops;

ACKNOWLEDGING the immense expenses incurred by the producers of GMOs seeking safe and effective genetic modification methodologies;

NOTING the use of genetic use restriction technologies (GURT) by producers of GMOs, as a means of recuperating research expenses by maintaining exclusive production and sale of GMOs, which take two general forms:

  • V-GURT - or "variety-level restriction technology," which causes a cultivar to produce sterile seed;
  • T-GURT - or "trait-level restriction technology," which prevents a cultivar from expressing a desirable value-added trait unless treated with a specific and exclusively supplied chemical substance, while otherwise producing additional fertile seed;

DEFINING "Subsistence farming" to consist of the keeping of livestock and the production of crops by farmers seeking to feed themselves and their families, producing little surplus;

CONCERNED that the use of V-GURT techniques may greatly increase the expense of subsistence farming, and so greatly increase the economic burden of the poor, because V-GURT techniques effectively prevent seed saving and so require the purchase of new seed from exclusive producers for each new crop;

FINDING that T-GURT techniques constitute a superior technology in that they both provide the producers of GMOs with the ability to recuperate the expenses of research and development by protecting access to value-added traits, while simultaneously permitting the continued practice of seed saving, thereby keeping the cost of subsistence farming by the poor as low as possible;

HEREBY DECLARES:

1) The development and introduction of any kind of variety-level genetic use restriction technology into any kind of genetically modified organism is prohibited in all member states.

2) Member states shall not allow any injunction, claim of damages, or criminal prosecution to be brought against any person or organization engaged in the reverse engineering of GMO seed for the sole purpose of removing variety-level genetic use restriction technology.

3) No part of this resolution shall otherwise affect the legality of GMO technologies generally, nor of trait-level genetic use restriction technology specifically.

4) No part of this resolution shall prevent the General Assembly from addressing the legality or regulation of GMO technologies generally, nor trait-level genetic use restriction technologies specifically, in future resolutions.
Last edited by A Humanist Science on Thu May 05, 2016 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Westercourt
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Westercourt » Fri Apr 29, 2016 11:43 pm

We see no problem with the proposal as stated and fully support it.
Unless otherwise stated, Ambassador Katie Bentley is speaking for Westercourt, Ambassador Chelsea Holt if arguing in the World Assembly, and Trade Ambassador Alexander Chamberlain in GE&T.

This nation is currently the World Assembly Delegate of Nintendo.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:05 am

OOC: You could've used your existing thread to post this.

Re-posting this as the objection still stands:
Araraukar wrote:So what incentive would there be for GMO producers to continue researching, developing and producing anything anymore, if anyone with access to genetic re-engineering can undo all their profits? Also, why do you assume that their prices would keep going up any more than the prices of everything else that a farmer needs? If you're wanting to stop the inflation of the price of goods, it's unfair to single out GMO producers.

Additionally, most poor subsistence farmers do, in fact, not have access to the necessary equipment and know-how to reverse engineer the seeds. You state non-profit organizations as being allowed to help, but "non-profit" doesn't mean "not asking for any payment", it just means "not asking for payment that exceeds your costs". If you're so sure that the GMO producers would put a high price on their products - their price would also include their own costs and perhaps a little on top - then surely any non-profit organization would also charge a fee for their services? That might very well also be outside the price range for the poorest subsistence farmers that you seek to help.


I don't see a marked difference between this and the previous draft.
Last edited by Araraukar on Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:43 pm

How is this free trade?

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:06 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:How is this free trade?

OOC: It's about as sensible as labeling it Social Justice, mister similar-proposal-writer. :P
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sat Apr 30, 2016 11:43 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:How is this free trade?

OOC: It's about as sensible as labeling it Social Justice, mister similar-proposal-writer. :P

Mine introduces economic regulations. Economic regulations are the opposite of the elimination of economic regulations. The act of introducing such regulations is opposed to free trade. Things opposed to free trade are necessarily social justice.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun May 01, 2016 6:29 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Things opposed to free trade are necessarily social justice.

OOC: I think we can both agree that it's a badly-named category. The welfare aspect should be split from the trade/economy restrictions.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2151
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abacathea » Sun May 01, 2016 7:21 am

Also, character limit on the title ☺️
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention
(Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas
(Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun May 01, 2016 7:29 am

Abacathea wrote:Also, character limit on the title ☺️

Oh I wasn't going to actually help him until he owed up why he made a new thread, when the message is the exact same as in the previous draft. :P
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Wed May 04, 2016 11:56 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:How is this free trade?


"V-GURT traits permit a level of rent-seeking that is particularly harmful to subsistence farmers, driving the costs of their production to punitive levels. Only relatively large scale agricultural operations will be able to compensate.

"As such, V-GURT traits represent a particular and unfair economic burden on subsistence farmers who, it has been rightly pointed out to us, are especially reliant on trade to meet their needs.

"Banning V-GURT traits will remove an unfair economic advantage favoring large-scale agricultural and biotech operations, and permit subsistance farmers to better compete."

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Wed May 04, 2016 12:06 pm

Araraukar wrote:OOC: You could've used your existing thread to post this.

Re-posting this as the objection still stands:
Araraukar wrote:So what incentive would there be for GMO producers to continue researching, developing and producing anything anymore, if anyone with access to genetic re-engineering can undo all their profits? Also, why do you assume that their prices would keep going up any more than the prices of everything else that a farmer needs? If you're wanting to stop the inflation of the price of goods, it's unfair to single out GMO producers.

Additionally, most poor subsistence farmers do, in fact, not have access to the necessary equipment and know-how to reverse engineer the seeds. You state non-profit organizations as being allowed to help, but "non-profit" doesn't mean "not asking for any payment", it just means "not asking for payment that exceeds your costs". If you're so sure that the GMO producers would put a high price on their products - their price would also include their own costs and perhaps a little on top - then surely any non-profit organization would also charge a fee for their services? That might very well also be outside the price range for the poorest subsistence farmers that you seek to help.


I don't see a marked difference between this and the previous draft.


OOC: Under my previous proposal, all genetic use restriction technologies remain legal; the proposal merely aims to permit certain rights of fair use.

With this proposal, V-GURT is explicitly banned, while T-GURT remains legal. This is a distinct departure from the previous proposal. Plus, this proposal only explicitly addresses the reverse engineering of V-GURT, to permit removal of a banned technology. This, again, is a distinct difference from the previous proposal. Especially since the previous proposal would allow subsistance farmers to take advantage of value-added GMO traits by reverse engineering T-GURT; no such permission is s granted by this proposal.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Wed May 04, 2016 12:09 pm

Abacathea wrote:Also, character limit on the title ☺️


"The Federation's Bureau of Title Condensation is currently working on a means of describing "variety-level genetic use restriction technology" in an acronym-free way."

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed May 04, 2016 2:04 pm

A Humanist Science wrote:With this proposal, V-GURT is explicitly banned, while T-GURT remains legal. This is a distinct departure from the previous proposal. Plus, this proposal only explicitly addresses the reverse engineering of V-GURT, to permit removal of a banned technology. This, again, is a distinct difference from the previous proposal. Especially since the previous proposal would allow subsistance farmers to take advantage of value-added GMO traits by reverse engineering T-GURT; no such permission is s granted by this proposal.

Why do you want to ban V-GURT entirely? Wouldn't it be better to just ban the sale of seeds to... Oh, I see you've dropped any mentions of subsistence farmers from the active clauses - why include the definition at all? So anyway, wouldn't V-GURT be applicable during the process of the GMO producer trying out new things on plants, when they don't want them to spread uncontrollably outside their trial farming plots?

Also, what about plants that aren't sown as seeds? Think of tubers (OOC: potato); they're not sown as seeds but rather planting tubers in the ground. Your proposal only talks about seeds. And what about plant varieties that are seedless due to non-GMO breeding practices (OOC: bananas)? Are they allowed to be seedless, still?

EDITs because I kept coming up with new ideas and also because damnit fingers.
Last edited by Araraukar on Wed May 04, 2016 2:11 pm, edited 4 times in total.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed May 04, 2016 2:38 pm

You pass this, I'll just copy-paste and repeal it.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Europe and Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 886
Founded: Mar 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Europe and Oceania » Wed May 04, 2016 3:29 pm

I fully support this and opposes any repeals of this proposal should it pass.
Last edited by Europe and Oceania on Wed May 04, 2016 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"For after all what is man in nature? A nothing in relation to infinity, all in relation to nothing, a central point between nothing and all and infinitely far from understanding either" --Blaise Pascal

"The Republican Party is not even a party anymore, it's just a group of Christian Fundamentalists and representatives for Corporate America."
--Kyle Kulinski, Host of Secular Talk


WA Delegate and Founder of New Utopian World


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads