OOC:
Okay, first of all, while I understand your desire to separate your response to Caracasus, from your response to me, do not make two posts, it just makes things difficult, try the following formatting tags.
- Code: Select all
[hr][/hr]
It will create a line, like this one.
NoFrellsGiven wrote:Thanks for the post. I don't know why I let the troll get to me.
I assure you, Imperium Anglorium, Seperatsist Peoples, Normlpeople, and most everyone involved with this thread is not a Troll.
NoFrellsGiven wrote:viewtopic.php?f=23&t=244917Contains the definition of technology tiers. A GA proposol has a limited amount of space which is why I linked. But even RP links are not allowed. The proposal replaces the link with: NS's seven Technology Tiers. Hopefully this will work because a GA proposal has limited character space.
I know about the link, and the 3000 Character Limit (Including Spaces!) that the GA mandates for Proposals, but, yes, you cannot link to anything in the document. Now, I do not see this definition in the OP, so you may want to edit it in, but I should mention that you will want to write this out yourself, otherwise it's Plagiarism.
NoFrellsGiven wrote:I removed the management definition. I guess NS does not go into this much detail.
Er, no, it has more to do with the fact that you never actually have Member States do anything, all this proposal does is create a Committee, hence, committee only violation.
NoFrellsGiven wrote:This is the idea where there are separate IEMs for each Technology Tiers. Tier 3 civlizations or higher may have this capability.
Okay, let me explain this, you see that Spoiler in my Signature? Says Tech Level on it. If you read that, you'll find that we are a P4 Civilization on the scale you use, that's been there a while now. That means Tier 1, Type 5, Interstellar Civilization, and no, there are no ways to transmit energy efficiently over a distance of several dozen light-years.
NoFrellsGiven wrote:The rules is a nation must allow the transmission of energy if they have idle transmission capacity. This is to ensure local demand cannot be out bid. For example if A and C want to trade but B is inbetween, B cannot be priced out and forced to shut down its demand so A and C can trade.
Yeah... Having us interact with the Committee does not count. However, this will seriously bother a lot of the Nations here, both In Character, and Out of Character. We will not be forced to give Energy to other nations, and you will be hard-pressed to convince anyone otherwise.
NoFrellsGiven wrote: I have switched to: The initial source of funding for the IETF will be 1% of GDP to be paid annually for the next 5 years. Which would benefit growing economies more.
That, is a horrible idea.
Think about how much that actually is, by my estimation, a theoretical US-Clone in the World Assembly would be paying somewhere around 162,000,000,000 USD, every year, for five years, to a committee they have no power over, which controls a system they do not want, that they are forced to interact with, for no adequate reason. If you want to explain how your proposal is funded, don't. It inevitably runs into problems like this, and mentioning the World Assembly General Fund will only get you a House of Cards Violation. Look, unless there is some reason you cannot be funded by the General Fund, do not mention how you are going to fund it, and just let the General Fund do its job.