by Percussionland » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:06 am
by Sierra Lyricalia » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:15 am
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:21 am
by The Dark Star Republic » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:29 am
by Sierra Lyricalia » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:48 am
by The Dourian Embassy » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:02 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:35 am
The Dourian Embassy wrote:You misspelled "resolution" in your "noting" line. I love the irony.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:38 am
by Percussionland » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:43 am
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Under no circumstances. Enforceability or no, #122 is one of the best resolutions this august and terrible Assembly has ever passed, and we will not sit back while its good name is dragged through the mud by a delegation that thinks a committee change is sufficient to fix an unsalvageably D.O.A. resolution's dire and godawful problems.
Just because we're all in the gutter doesn't mean none of us are looking at the stars.
Hell no and bollocks to this.
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:53 am
Percussionland wrote:Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Under no circumstances. Enforceability or no, #122 is one of the best resolutions this august and terrible Assembly has ever passed, and we will not sit back while its good name is dragged through the mud by a delegation that thinks a committee change is sufficient to fix an unsalvageably D.O.A. resolution's dire and godawful problems.
Just because we're all in the gutter doesn't mean none of us are looking at the stars.
Hell no and bollocks to this.
I am going to do more to improve that proposal other than a committee change, and I have recieved support for the "DOA resolution."
by Frustrated Franciscans » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:31 am
by Percussionland » Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:26 pm
by Three Weasels » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:54 pm
by Percussionland » Fri Oct 17, 2014 7:28 am
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:04 am
Percussionland wrote:That is a discussion for another thread, please stay on topic, and I don't need you to tell me what is more relevant for my needs, I can do that myself. Not having a pointless and completely unenforceable resolution in effect would be more relevant for my nations needs, ambassador.
by The Dark Star Republic » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:41 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Had you bothered to obey this one
by Vasputia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:06 pm
Percussionland wrote:RECOGNIZING the good intentions of GA #122.
APPLAUDING these efforts at furthering democracy.
HOWEVER NOTING that these efforts have miserably failed.
NOTING that there is no way to enforce this resoulution, or stop nations from mindlessly voting with the majority should they so choose.
NOTING that there isn't even a way to determine who is in violation of this resolution.
FURTHER NOTING that even for nations who do obey this resolution, their World Assembly ammbassador could have an intern on his first day read the resolution, and have it be legal.
BELIEVING that If a resolution cannot be enforced, has massive loopholes, and essentially does nothing, it is a waste of the World Assembly's valuable time in trying to enforce it, and must be repealed.
STATING TO THE WORLD ASSEMBLY that we tried, and like all failed experiments, when you know it won't work, it is a waste of time to keep trying.
HEREBY REPEALS GA #122 Read The Resolution Act.
by Percussionland » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:22 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:45 am
Percussionland wrote:While allowing a better written proposal on the same topic to be written that will improve democracy from where it is now in WA member states.
by Percussionland » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:55 am
by Percussionland » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:58 am
by Louisistan » Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:04 am
Percussionland wrote:A better proposal would mandate the delegate in charge of voting on behalf of the nation read the resolution, not just some lowly intern. As it is, this resolution is unenforceable, useless, and a waste of time.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:05 am
by The Dark Star Republic » Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:12 am
Louisistan wrote:Percussionland wrote:A better proposal would mandate the delegate in charge of voting on behalf of the nation read the resolution, not just some lowly intern. As it is, this resolution is unenforceable, useless, and a waste of time.
OOC: Ever heard of a little thing of "don't force RP on others"? Pretty sure it's a GA rule.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:12 am
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:How is requiring the ambassador to read "forcing RP"?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Overmind
Advertisement