Non-government business entities?
Advertisement
by Friday Freshman » Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:51 am
by Friday Freshman » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:01 am
by Three Weasels » Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:57 pm
by Normlpeople » Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:22 pm
by Friday Freshman » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:31 pm
Normlpeople wrote:Clover read the latest draft. "As I read this, it would prevent anyone working for a corporation from seeking public office, it may well prevent anyone in business from donating to a political campaign. While you may have an issue to tackle, perhaps doing so in a less draconian way would be better".
by Moronist Decisions » Mon Oct 06, 2014 7:38 pm
by The Great Leap Forward » Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:53 pm
by Normlpeople » Tue Oct 07, 2014 4:20 am
Friday Freshman wrote:Hmmmmm, I feel that if we made a special exemption for wages, companies could possibly just add a politician to their payroll and the whole resolution is out the window.
The Great Leap Forward wrote:In the People's Republic, all businesses are owned by the state or state representative. This resolution takes an unfair view of our particular socialist system, and would effectively outlaw our state-owned enterprises; this is the height of capitalist ignorance and shows disrespect to our ancient culture and unique economic system by myopically embracing a corrupt "free-market" and inherently western view of economics and business. We steadfastly oppose this resolution.
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Oct 07, 2014 4:57 am
by Olvern » Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:40 am
"I'm pretty sure some nations are pretty into the whole idea of the Corporation and the Government being... in bed, if you get my drift. I'm not sure if everyone in this body will agree with the sentiment that lobbying is a 'plague'."Friday Freshman wrote:Category: Political Stability
Strength: Significant
REALIZING that both international and national politics are plagued by many kinds of lobbying especially Corporate Lobbying
"What problems? Corruption? Even if they are supposedly inherent, be more specific. Kind of a "trying to make your case to the non-believers" kind of thing here."RECOGNIZING that currently no resolution deals with these problems including and especially noting GAR #248 : Against Corruption
"Okay, that kind of solves things. Except that sometimes the boundary between government and business can be quite unclear, especially in states where overtly private companies play some role in governance, but are not explicitly part of the government. Does this resolution apply to them in that case?"DECLARING for the purpose of this resolution, any business that is the government, or is part of the government, will not be considered a business from here on out
"Only money or positions? I'm pretty sure corruption would extend beyond that."DEFINING Corporate Lobbying as the act of influencing a politician or government with the promise of any reward, namely money or a position, for helping further business interests in the political world
"No problems with this... except for Separatists Peoples' comment on the potential loophole here. Not sure if this is a smart move or what."DEFINING Corporate Heads as those who are currently the owner or hold a position of power that allows access to the financial budgeting in a business excluding stock holders that are not the majority stock holder
MANDATING:
"That is harsh. Good luck getting this one passed, man."
- That Corporate Lobbying be immeaditely made illegal in all member countries
- Any business found to be funneling money any political candidate with the purpose of corporate gain shall be fined
- Any business found to be expressing it's corporate interests under the name of their business in any way to a political candidate in the hopes that they may vote a certain way on a political matter shall be fined
- That Corporate Heads donating money from their corporation's funds to a politician be immediately made illegal in all member countries
"Wow! So positions can be given? Sexual favours? Silly dances?"RE-ESTABLISHING that a person, Corporate Head or not, still has the right to ask a politician to vote a certain way on a bill as long as money doesn't change hands
"In general, this resolution as it is too absolute, and presumes the nature of politics in many sovereign states as being supposed to be de jure independent from business interest, when that may not be the case for all WA members, and may in several cases be against the sovereign national interest of these nation states."HOPING that the World Assembly will eventually be able to fully remove corporations from politics
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 07, 2014 10:07 am
by New Mushroom Kingdom » Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:51 am
by The Dark Star Republic » Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:21 am
New Mushroom Kingdom wrote:The New Mushroom Kingdom stands AGAINST this resolution for undisclosed reasons.
In the event that it passes, does any delegate possibly know any loopholes?
by New Mushroom Kingdom » Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:26 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:New Mushroom Kingdom wrote:The New Mushroom Kingdom stands AGAINST this resolution for undisclosed reasons.
In the event that it passes, does any delegate possibly know any loopholes?
It's impossible to advise you on "loopholes" if you won't state the nature of your objection, much as I'm sure there's some tortuous dictionary-wrangling ahead.
by The Dark Star Republic » Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:31 am
New Mushroom Kingdom wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:It's impossible to advise you on "loopholes" if you won't state the nature of your objection, much as I'm sure there's some tortuous dictionary-wrangling ahead.
Stepping up to the honourable delegate, the NMK delegate quietly whispered: 'I wish to keep the rights of corporations unrestricted in the regard of lobbying - if they want to try to influence a government agent via money, who is the WA to stop them?'
DECLARING for the purpose of this resolution, any business that is the government, or is part of the government, will not be considered a business from here on out
by New Mushroom Kingdom » Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:34 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:New Mushroom Kingdom wrote:Stepping up to the honourable delegate, the NMK delegate quietly whispered: 'I wish to keep the rights of corporations unrestricted in the regard of lobbying - if they want to try to influence a government agent via money, who is the WA to stop them?'
Then the most obvious, albeit unwieldy, loophole is to nationalise your entire industry.DECLARING for the purpose of this resolution, any business that is the government, or is part of the government, will not be considered a business from here on out
More practically, you can still permit non-monetary lobbying. Share certificates, corporate benefits, pretty much anything is allowed "as long as money doesn't change hands".
The biggest loophole though is that this is a terrible proposal that, at worst, would be easy to repeal, and more likely wouldn't even pass.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Yerrisey
Advertisement