[ReFormatted] On Archaeological Excavations

by **Lexicor** » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:24 am

OOC: Bringing this back :blush:

by **Jarish Inyo** » Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:28 pm

Let it fade away.

by **Lexicor** » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:02 pm

Jarish Inyo wrote:Let it fade away.

And why exactly?

by **Jarish Inyo** » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:17 pm

One, no one had commented on this proposal for 2 weeks before you decided to bump it.
Second, this is not an international concern. nations are capable of managing archaeological excavations within their borders without another WA committee looking over their shoulder.

by **Lexicor** » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:50 pm

Jarish Inyo wrote:One, no one had commented on this proposal for 2 weeks before you decided to bump it.
Second, this is not an international concern. nations are capable of managing archaeological excavations within their borders without another WA committee looking over their shoulder.

Its the same committee established in a previous resolutions with expanded powers.

by **Jarish Inyo** » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:31 pm

The committee doesn't need to be expanded to be a watch dog over archaeological excavations.

Archaeological excavations within a nations boarders are not an international issue. It's up to a nation to permit archaeological excavations and who will be allowed to take part in them. Or to bull doze the site and build a mall over it.

Also, you ignored the fact that no one responded to this proposal for two weeks before you bumped it.

by **Ainocra** » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:35 pm

While I'm not overly opposed to the idea I do fail to see how it is an international issue.

[ReFormatted] On Archaeological Excavations

If this were at vote right now how would you vote?

Who is online