The Dark Star Republic wrote:Full support! There are so few sharply written repeals anymore.
Too true, alas: Where now, Ecopoeia? Where now, G l o g?
Advertisement
by Bears Armed Mission » Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:04 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:Full support! There are so few sharply written repeals anymore.
by Wrapper » Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:25 am
by The Dark Star Republic » Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:36 am
by Sciongrad » Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:34 am
by Hakio » Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:46 am
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by The Scientific States » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:42 pm
by Wrapper » Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:40 pm
by Great Britain and Austrasia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:21 pm
by Wrapper » Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:27 pm
by Egemore » Mon Aug 11, 2014 4:33 pm
by Normlpeople » Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:20 pm
by Wrapper » Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:40 pm
Egemore wrote: Perhaps "Also also convinced" could be changed...
by Annadelle » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:31 pm
by Wrapper » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:36 pm
Annadelle wrote:"We have no problem with 'On Genetically Modified Foods' as it simply required nations to keep a record. We will not support this repeal unless substantial evidence against this resolution is brought forth."
~Kristoffer Bjorkman, Annadelle Ambassador to the WA
by Lexicor » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:57 pm
by Yukonastan » Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:14 pm
by Bears Armed Mission » Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:36 am
Wrapper wrote:We'll be playing with the first word of each line eventually
by Wrapper » Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:10 am
Yukonastan wrote:"CONVINCED that genetically modified foods are virtually indistinguishable from conventional crops;"
My steak might be genetically modified, but it sure as hell don't look like bread to me. You might want to change crops to foods.
by Annadelle » Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:13 pm
Wrapper wrote:Annadelle wrote:"We have no problem with 'On Genetically Modified Foods' as it simply required nations to keep a record. We will not support this repeal unless substantial evidence against this resolution is brought forth."
~Kristoffer Bjorkman, Annadelle Ambassador to the WA
It does more than that. It requires labeling on what otherwise would be benign foods (if they weren't benign, they would not be allowed to be sold under GAR #64), which may prevent them from being exported to countries where such foods are needlessly deemed inferior.
by Wrapper » Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:29 pm
Annadelle wrote:If it helps nations identify GMO so they can ban their exportation, that is a good thing.
by Empire of Africa » Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:31 pm
by Wrapper » Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:34 pm
Empire of Africa wrote:I think Genetically modified foods are better for the agricultural industry therefore I respyectfully call for the Draft to not come.
by Hakio » Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:03 pm
Wrapper wrote:Empire of Africa wrote:I think Genetically modified foods are better for the agricultural industry therefore I respyectfully call for the Draft to not come.
What? If you think that "genetically modified foods are better for the agricultural industry" then you should be in SUPPORT of this repeal, as it removes the labeling restrictions currently in place, thus increasing the availability, sale, and growth of such foods.
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Araraukar » Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:34 pm
Hakio wrote:In my opinion, it's the consumer's right to know what they eat.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Simone Republic
Advertisement