Sauvage wrote:Defwa wrote:As far as I understand it, this does still quite apply even if you have no cameras. So much as sketching an act described in this resolution is a violation if you're using authentic models.
Giving an exasperated sigh. Implying we have any skilled artists willing to draw naked children in the first place, though it appears if the contempt held by the Sauvage goverment is anything to go by I won't need to burn my art on the wall depicting Cupid as a naked boy with wings and a bow.
It's not the subject stated by the representative. He has placed an embargo of sorts on the assembly for legalizing the killing for innocents and then turning around and pretending it loves those it condemns. I can't blame him.
You might. Its nigh impossible to say that you don't with certainty.
The point you brought up previously was regarding your people's ability to visually capture the banned subject and that is what I addressed however if you want to make this about abortion, I'm afraid you're confusing the intent of one of these resolutions.
Its a rabbit hole my fellow ambassadors would probably prefer I don't follow you down. One might even say you're baiting fire by bringing it up in a completely out of context and off topic manner.