"Except for regions with endorsement caps, who happen to be the biggest."
Advertisement
by Hakio » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:22 am
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:36 am
by Wrapper » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:40 am
by Hakio » Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:06 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:05 pm
Wrapper wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:
"Inhabitants can withdraw their support at any time. I hate that people view delegate votes as somehow "unfair" when its all a matter of choice..."
For the record, I don't view this as unfair. I knew the rules going in, and each of us implicitly accepts them when we submit proposals. What I can't figure out is why it's so unpopular among the high-count delegates, while being just about 50-50 among everyone else. Small sample size is all I can come up with. Still have to wonder, if there was something I could have done differently to swing a couple of them.
Hakio wrote:"The most powerful few should represent the most massive amounts of nations of which they possess."
by Nesixar » Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:32 pm
by Rotwood » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:44 pm
Southwest florida wrote:Can my nation offer other courses
by Frustrated Franciscans » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:29 pm
Hakio wrote:"Once again the rights of individual nations are being trumped by delegates...."
by New Langsia » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:15 pm
by Frustrated Franciscans » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:48 pm
Alderlock wrote:How would WUP harm anyone? Shame people are voting against it.
by Wrapper » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:50 pm
Frustrated Franciscans wrote:Because it is a crappy degree and yet nations are urged to hire people with this crappy degree in both the public and private sectors, obviously in lieu of real important degrees.
by Rotwood » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:22 pm
Alderlock wrote:How would WUP harm anyone? Shame people are voting against it.
by Wrapper » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:47 pm
by Rotwood » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:59 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:25 pm
Rotwood wrote:Wrapper wrote:Why do you have so much hatred for peace? We have military academies, liberal arts colleges, science and engineering schools. Why not peace?
Felicia glares
"I believe you are asking the wrong question here. I come from a peaceful nation, so we have no hatred for peace. What we do have is a good sense for a waste of money, and a belief that the WA should not be establishing universities, especially narrow ones like this. We stated during the drafting, which has been ignored, might I add, and have reiterated since it has gone to vote, a university based on such a narrow scope is both a waste of time and money. That is where our supposed 'hatred' lies. If this was put forward to the Rotan parliament, it would be laughed out for the joke that it is."
by Rotwood » Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:36 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:Rotwood wrote:Felicia glares
"I believe you are asking the wrong question here. I come from a peaceful nation, so we have no hatred for peace. What we do have is a good sense for a waste of money, and a belief that the WA should not be establishing universities, especially narrow ones like this. We stated during the drafting, which has been ignored, might I add, and have reiterated since it has gone to vote, a university based on such a narrow scope is both a waste of time and money. That is where our supposed 'hatred' lies. If this was put forward to the Rotan parliament, it would be laughed out for the joke that it is."
"The disciplines that surround diplomacy, international relations, and mediation are not only wide fields of discipline, they draw on many other fields as well. This is no more narrow in scope then a military academy or a trade school would be."
by Nesixar » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:27 pm
by Wrapper » Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:30 am
Rotwood wrote:We stated during the drafting, which has been ignored, might I add, and have reiterated since it has gone to vote, a university based on such a narrow scope is both a waste of time and money.
Still unresolved -- and likely never to be resolved to everyone's satisfaction -- is the "Peace zOMG not a real course/why not fund everything" issue. We believe, as implied in the preamble, that other courses of study are well-established and well-funded throughout the world, but there is a significant gap when it comes to irenology, diplomacy, etc. (OOC: And, as proven by the RL links I posted above, such courses of study do exist around the world, including at the UN-sponsored University for Peace. Damn, thought I had an original idea here!)
by Bears Armed » Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:25 am
Wrapper wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:
"Inhabitants can withdraw their support at any time. I hate that people view delegate votes as somehow "unfair" when its all a matter of choice..."
For the record, I don't view this as unfair. I knew the rules going in, and each of us implicitly accepts them when we submit proposals. What I can't figure out is why it's so unpopular among the high-count delegates, while being just about 50-50 among everyone else. Small sample size is all I can come up with. Still have to wonder, if there was something I could have done differently to swing a couple of them.
by Wrapper » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:21 am
Bears Armed wrote:OOC; Sometimes it seems to help, at least slightly, if you actually join their regional forums and announce your willingness to discuss the proposal there too... although admittedly trying to do so for more than a handful of regions can get rather time-consuming.
by Rotwood » Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:13 pm
Wrapper wrote:Rotwood wrote:We stated during the drafting, which has been ignored, might I add, and have reiterated since it has gone to vote, a university based on such a narrow scope is both a waste of time and money.
Ignored? Really?Still unresolved -- and likely never to be resolved to everyone's satisfaction -- is the "Peace zOMG not a real course/why not fund everything" issue. We believe, as implied in the preamble, that other courses of study are well-established and well-funded throughout the world, but there is a significant gap when it comes to irenology, diplomacy, etc. (OOC: And, as proven by the RL links I posted above, such courses of study do exist around the world, including at the UN-sponsored University for Peace. Damn, thought I had an original idea here!)
If you want to study physics, or engineering, or teaching, or philosophy, or linguistics, or military theory, or even a trade like car repair, there are hundreds of thousands of colleges, universities and trade schools where you can choose to study. If you want to study peace and conflict resolution... not so many. And we, as well as other supporters, ha've already shown that there are many nations (and no doubt private philanthropists) willing to support this cause and donate land and funds to pay for it all, so that we are hardly taking anything from the WA general fund. Given that as a World Assembly our job is to improve the world one resolution at a time... how does a low-cost, internationally sponsored, educational institution with multiple campuses throughout the universe, whose mission is to promote PEACE, not improve the world?
III. Solicit supplemental funding for the University via private and public donations and voluntary governmental grants, including the land used for WUP campuses. The Board and the University shall not charge students tuition.
by Wrapper » Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:26 pm
Rotwood wrote:To reiterate, we are not against peace, nor the study of it, I just think this body should single it out, or any dedicated field of study, above all the others."
by The Eternal Kawaii » Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement