Frustrated Franciscans wrote:Eireann Fae wrote:Rowan shakes her head at the Frustrated Franciscan. "The gnomes do a lot of things that you may consider beneath their dignity, yet they shall continue to toil tirelessly to ensure nations' compliance with whatever resolutions this body sees fit to pass. We are rather curious, however, as to why you believe such legislation as we are proposing may be 'political damaging' to all governments of member nations." She directs her attention to the other delegates assembled.
Friar John Sanders stands up and smiles. "It is one thing for a gnome to study, economic, political, and even social and societal data. It is quite another thing for them to be required to research 'the details and effects of sexual activity.' As they say, the devil's in those details. Are they required to research the preferred positions, level of foreplay, and a variety of other factors? After all you do state, 'including, but not limited to.' Look, I have no problem, well I do have problems, but that's not the point, with establishing sexual educations standards. I do have a problem with a committee to research the sexual details of citizens of member nations. As for the politically damaging part, I would ask Brother Maynard to explain that one in more detail."
Brother Maynard stood up. Why does the first order always ask the third order to explain the hard questions. "You see," Brother Maynard began, "while most nations might have a liberal sexual attitude they often, at the same time, place significant requirements of chastity on their elected officials. Note, I said chastity, not celibacy. Unfortunately, they are generally no better than the majority of the people in their own nation. Should these things be properly 'researched' by the gnomes, who are very good at what they do, the indiscretions of elected officials will be inevitably recorded. According to World Assembly Resolution ... (slight pause as he shuffles through his papers) number 196, 'Freedom of Information Act' such records are available to a general request through a FOIA request. Now I would hate to see what would be the result in most nations should the full details of a certain restroom on a certain floor within this building became public knowledge in the various nations throughout the whole World Assembly. There are just some things that should be kept private, for the good of the continued existence of the elected officials, of course."
So your disapproval of this proposal based on the fact that politicians may have lied and hidden their past to get to their positions?
Then out with them!