Advertisement
by Super-Llamaland » Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:57 pm
by Super-Llamaland » Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:27 pm
by Orennana » Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:27 am
by The Tidal Wake » Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:17 am
by Jeckland » Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:23 am
by Super-Llamaland » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:33 pm
by Gregoryisgodistan » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:13 pm
Super-Llamaland wrote:Looks pretty good, but I have two questions.
1.) What's your preferred format over twenty-one teams, which I think is our number right now?
2.) Why, why, why would you have these tiebreakers!?!?!?!
1. H2H W-L
2. H2H run differential
3. H2H runs for
4. Overall run differential
5. Overall runs for
6. Playoff Game/Games
3.) Sure, H2H W-L should go in front, but why in the world and multiple parallel universes would you use H2HRD and H2HRF in front of RD?
by New Wolfopolis » Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:16 pm
by Super-Llamaland » Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:01 pm
by Jeckland » Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:01 pm
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:Super-Llamaland wrote:Looks pretty good, but I have two questions.
1.) What's your preferred format over twenty-one teams, which I think is our number right now?
2.) Why, why, why would you have these tiebreakers!?!?!?!
1. H2H W-L
2. H2H run differential
3. H2H runs for
4. Overall run differential
5. Overall runs for
6. Playoff Game/Games
3.) Sure, H2H W-L should go in front, but why in the world and multiple parallel universes would you use H2HRD and H2HRF in front of RD?
While I do think Jeckland should have been more specific with the group arrangement, I should point out that I used the same tiebreakers as he did, except that they were only used for non-decisive ties (i.e. two way tie for first place in group with both teams going through anyway) and there was a one-game playoff the other times. It was never questioned, even though my tiebreak proposals were far more unconventional than Jeck's. Also, I concur with him that H2HRD and H2HRF should be ahead of Overall RD and RF. If H2H is what matters in breaking a tie, then the rest of H2H should follow before you move on to overall. And frankly, my "always have a one-game playoff in decisive ties" proposal last IBS was way more unusual than this. And the tiebreakers for non-decisive ties were identical to Jeck's proposal, as was the procedure to determine home team for the one-game playoff in decisive ties. So this is nothing new.
by Gregoryisgodistan » Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:47 am
by Gregoryisgodistan Special Admin Zone » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:14 am
Gregoryisgodistan wrote:I'm also willing to throw in Gregoryisgodistan Special Administrative Zone (known here as Gregoryisgodistan Special Admin Zone due to character limits) as a numbers puppet to get to 24, but I would request that it be cut first if we get more than that. Will confirm from my computer when I'm on it.
by Northern Sunrise Islands » Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:59 pm
by Oakbrook and Calvarie » Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:11 pm
Pro: Deer
Anti: Anti-Deer Things
by Gregoryisgodistan » Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:00 pm
by Celter » Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:03 pm
by Super-Llamaland » Sat Apr 12, 2014 7:50 pm
Super-Llamaland wrote:all accepted. Twice again, depending on when you read this, signups will either be updated or about to be.
by Gregoryisgodistan » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:08 pm
by New Wolfopolis » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:26 pm
by Mochria » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:26 pm
New Wolfopolis wrote:I'll throw in Mochria if it'll help round out numbers, if not, I'll get rid of it.
by Super-Llamaland » Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:26 pm
by Hicana » Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:47 pm
by New Wolfopolis » Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:56 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement