...
Ah.
Advertisement
by Krytenia » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:03 pm
by Liventia » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:15 pm
Legalese wrote:Eastfield Lodge wrote:Technically, anyone before the invention of rankings.
Which would technically make Crosshill the lowest-ranked winner, being unranked. However, so was everyone else, you would suspect - I'm suspecting the only person around that played in it would be able to shed more light - so calling the nation that "set the benchmark for excellence for the next hundred years." the lowest-ranked winner misses the point.
In the KPB era, Audio andDorian & SonyaThe Sylvanaes Queendom appear to share the record for lowest sequential rank from a winner with 39th. I don't believe anyone's kept a record of the winner with the fewest KPB points in the KPB era.
by Alasdair I Frosticus » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:33 am
Liventia wrote:Legalese wrote:
Which would technically make Crosshill the lowest-ranked winner, being unranked. However, so was everyone else, you would suspect - I'm suspecting the only person around that played in it would be able to shed more light - so calling the nation that "set the benchmark for excellence for the next hundred years." the lowest-ranked winner misses the point.
In the KPB era, Audio andDorian & SonyaThe Sylvanaes Queendom appear to share the record for lowest sequential rank from a winner with 39th. I don't believe anyone's kept a record of the winner with the fewest KPB points in the KPB era.
In the early editions (WC1 aside) ranks were calculated based on finish in the previous cup – the lowest ranked winner was, afaik, WC4's Dennisov.
by The Sova Empire » Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:39 am
by Farfadillis » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:12 am
Alasdair I Frosticus wrote:Rankings only began with WC3, I believe - in both WC1 & 2, the first 32 nations to sign up were the entire field, and this was done entirely on a first-come, first-served basis (except for the host).
by Liventia » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:17 am
Farfadillis wrote:Alasdair I Frosticus wrote:Rankings only began with WC3, I believe - in both WC1 & 2, the first 32 nations to sign up were the entire field, and this was done entirely on a first-come, first-served basis (except for the host).
Well, IIRC, I remember visiting a site that was incredibly old but featured the post-WC1 rankings. Maybe they were Post WC2? I think it would be worth finding again. But I was about to finish elementary school back then, so feel free to ignore me.
by Felix » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:33 am
Farfadillis wrote:Alasdair I Frosticus wrote:Rankings only began with WC3, I believe - in both WC1 & 2, the first 32 nations to sign up were the entire field, and this was done entirely on a first-come, first-served basis (except for the host).
Well, IIRC, I remember visiting a site that was incredibly old but featured the post-WC1 rankings. Maybe they were Post WC2? I think it would be worth finding again. But I was about to finish elementary school back then, so feel free to ignore me.
by Farfadillis » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:45 am
Felix wrote:Farfadillis wrote:
Well, IIRC, I remember visiting a site that was incredibly old but featured the post-WC1 rankings. Maybe they were Post WC2? I think it would be worth finding again. But I was about to finish elementary school back then, so feel free to ignore me. :P
I think I was at the beginning of elementary school when the first World Cup happened...
Man do I feel young. >.>
Liventia wrote:Farfadillis wrote:
Well, IIRC, I remember visiting a site that was incredibly old but featured the post-WC1 rankings. Maybe they were Post WC2? I think it would be worth finding again. But I was about to finish elementary school back then, so feel free to ignore me. :P
I highly doubt that, WC1 and 2 would be ten years ago now…
by Zwangzug » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:53 am
by The Royal Kingdom of Quebec » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:58 am
Zwangzug wrote:Post-WC1 rankings
by Felix » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:00 am
Farfadillis wrote:Felix wrote:I think I was at the beginning of elementary school when the first World Cup happened...
Man do I feel young. >.>
Nevermind that last bit, I was actually starting Primary School, hich according to Wikipedia is Elementary School, which isn't what I meant, which was kindergarten... man, foreign education is confusing. I still don't know what college is.
On a more related note, if we had one more Atlantian in the World Cup, exactly half of the participating teams would be from AO.
In total there are 15 from AO, 9 from Rushmore, 3 from Esportiva and 5 from other regions. I think we (AO) might be starting to take this a little too far.
by Equestrian States » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:00 am
Zwangzug wrote:The even older version
by Farfadillis » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:08 am
Zwangzug wrote:I think I might know what Farfadillis is talking about, and if not, well, maybe you can enjoy the retro tour. This is, needless to say, from way before my time as well, but some of the old pages link to it.
NSWCC
The even older version
Post-WC1 rankings
by Krytenia » Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:24 pm
Farfadillis wrote:In total there are 15 from AO, 9 from Rushmore, 3 from Esportiva and 5 from other regions. I think we (AO) might be starting to take this a little too far.
by Vilita » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:02 pm
Krytenia wrote:Farfadillis wrote:In total there are 15 from AO, 9 from Rushmore, 3 from Esportiva and 5 from other regions. I think we (AO) might be starting to take this a little too far.
To be honest, some of us AOldies (Vilita, Star, myself...technically) would comment with "only fifteen? SLACKERS!"
by Farfadillis » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:16 pm
by Qazox » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:33 pm
by Filopines » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:05 pm
Felix wrote:Farfadillis wrote:
Nevermind that last bit, I was actually starting Primary School, hich according to Wikipedia is Elementary School, which isn't what I meant, which was kindergarten... man, foreign education is confusing. I still don't know what college is.
On a more related note, if we had one more Atlantian in the World Cup, exactly half of the participating teams would be from AO.
In total there are 15 from AO, 9 from Rushmore, 3 from Esportiva and 5 from other regions. I think we (AO) might be starting to take this a little too far.
Yeah...
*grumbles on how there should have been 4*
Seriously though, wow, 15 from AO. So I guess AO is the Europe of NS WC?
by Maklohi Vai » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:09 pm
by Equestrian States » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:10 pm
by Farfadillis » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:10 pm
by Felix » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:14 pm
Equestrian States wrote:The Cup of Harmony group draw has been posted.
by Equestrian States » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:17 pm
Equestrian States wrote:Will the monks earn a victory for Orthodoxy (despite their somewhat peculiar behavior as humans), or will they once again exhibit humility and fall short of the glory of the second round?
by Saintland » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:20 pm
Equestrian States wrote:The Cup of Harmony group draw has been posted.
by The Sova Empire » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Quebec and Shingoryeo
Advertisement