by United Earthlings » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:46 pm
by Democratic Colonies » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:17 pm
United Earthlings wrote:(11.) While the products on this storefront are based on Real Life products any Similarity to Real Life products is purely coincidence.
by United Earthlings » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:18 pm
Democratic Colonies wrote:
That's funny. You should become a comedy writer.
by Zinaire » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:36 pm
United Earthlings wrote:Democratic Colonies wrote:
That's funny. You should become a comedy writer.
Thank you, but if you knew the reason while I posted that clause you wouldn't be laughing or if you were, you'd probably die from laughter for how truly sad it is that I had to put in the first place such a clause in of all things a fictional business [storefront]. However, oddly enough if you will believe that simple clause has saved me a lot of headache over the years, so for a little bit of irony, I think it worked out quite well. Universal Balance Restored!
by Ekraysia » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:46 am
by United Earthlings » Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:54 pm
Zinaire wrote:
I think you should develop a gun that gets rid of sentences that don't make sense.
Ekraysia wrote:Hey, you may won't remember me, I used to be Antigr.
Anyhoo, I thought you'd vanished from the forums a couple of years ago.
by Ekraysia » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:49 am
United Earthlings wrote: I don't remember Ekraysia, but I do remember Antigr. How's s/he been? I even oddly enough still have one of his old telegrams sitting in my inbox.
On a more series note, you do know you can undelete your own nation right? A mod is no longer neccessary.
by Democratic Colonies » Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:19 pm
United Earthlings wrote:(11.) While the products on this storefront are based on Real Life products any Similarity to Real Life products is purely coincidence.
United Earthlings wrote:(11.) While the products on this storefront are based on Real Life products...
United Earthlings wrote:(11.) ...any Similarity to Real Life products is purely coincidence.
United Earthlings wrote:(11.) Advance metals, materials and technologies are used so that the products listed here exceed those that they are based on and those of other nations.
United Earthlings wrote:(9.) Production Rights Agreement- Production Rights Agreement: By buying production rights to said product, you acquire the right to not only produce said product in your nation for life but you also acquire the advance manufacturing methods we use and any modifications you make to said product is yours and yours alone. UEMS can not claim any rights to said product. However, you may not sell, transfer, share or loan the manufacturing methods or production rights of said product to other nations if you have not made any modifications to that said product. Violation of the Production Rights Agreement will result at least in the removal of the production rights and at worse a state of war. [OCC Note: Upon request at the time of order, should you inquire to know what exact manufacturing methods your nation will be acquiring, I will state so via a private message in due time. Additional Note: Those manufacturing methods are copyrighted {trade marked} by me {UEMS}, so please respect that.]
by United Earthlings » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:30 pm
Democratic Colonies wrote:This statement from the 11th point of the regulations and notices section is highly problematic. I'm going to break it down, as it makes two assertions.
So the storefront has products based on real life products. You have seen real life products and based these storefront products on these real life products in a deliberate action. Basing things on other things is a deliberate choice.
So you saw real life products and based these storefront products on these real life products in a deliberate action... by coincidence?
That is not how basing things on other things work. One cannot see Painting A, base Painting B on Painting A, and then claim that any similarity to Painting A is purely coincidence. The concepts of basing things on other things, and being similar to other things by coincidence, are mutually exclusive.
Continuing, I believe that the claim that the similarity of the UEMS storefront products to real life products is purely coincidence is rather absurd. You are saying that the Barret M82 rifle are two totally different rifles and the fact that they look exactly the same and share the exact same specifications are entirely coincidental. That's a bit of a big coincidence, don't you think?
Now, continuing on with the 11th point of the UEMS regulations and notices,
(11.) Advance metals, materials and technologies are used so that the products listed here exceed those that they are based on and those of other nations.
As UEMS has been active for some years now, and has processed over 929 sales, perhaps it's about time that the UEMS actually provides some information about what advanced metals, materials and technologies are used to make the UEMS Barret M82 rifle better than the RL Barret M82 rifle?
Now, leaving the 11th point alone for now, I will backtrack a bit. The 9th point of the regulations and notices section has an OOC notice attached. Bolding is mine:
It is implied that with the purchase of production rights to the UEMS Barret M82 rifle, advanced manufacturing methods are a part of the transaction as well. Again, as UEMS has been active for some years now, and has processed over 929 sales, perhaps it's about time that the UEMS actually provides some information about what advanced manufacturing methods are used to make UEMS products like the UEMS Barret M82 rifle better than the RL Barret M82 rifle?
by Zinaire » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:47 pm
A few things, first wrong thread dude-as I told DC-comments-complaints-concerns-questions-bring them to the OCC thread I created.
Third, I don't know if it was your intention or not, but as it stands your only coming off sounding like a dick.
Fourth, the above following sentence-[You may have better sales, but they're not from a particularly prestigious clientele]-is beyond hilarious and nearly cracked me up especially since from all people it's coming from you. I'll give you some time to think about that statement I bolded and if still don't see the unbelievable irony in it, then well I'll be more then glad to point it out to you.
Fifth and final point, I'm not the webmaster nor a moderator of Nationstates, it's not my job to teach everyone the various written and unwritten rules of Nationstates.
I've tried to provided as much information as I can in my storefront as it relates to storefront rules. Whether one chooses to read and comprehend those rules is beyond my ability. So, no if you would take the time to read through all those links and posted rules I was kindly enough to provide, you'd see I've covered pretty much everything.
by United Earthlings » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Zinaire wrote:I realize that there's an OOC thread, but you seem to prefer posting in the other one.
That makes two of us. Many of your comments to DC were either extremely patronizing ("You understanding now what I’m getting at when I’m referring to market quality or do I need to explain further?") or just downright rude ("I'm sure there was a point you were trying to make in your statement above and therefore show I was using poor logic, but I'm sorry I'm just not seeing it, in fact from what I read").
Yes, I did make numerous purchases from you when I first started RPing. At the time, no one had been kind enough to tell me the rules regarding RL products, and you certainly weren't going to as it would harm your sales. That was more than a year ago though, and some of us have improved our RPing in that time.
The moderators are hardly the only ones who can tell people how things work around here. More often than not, it's other players who are stepping up and telling newbies how things are done. If you want to use your lack of authority as an excuse to essentially run a scam (I don't know what else to call it when someone sells something that is available for free), good for you, but it's not a particularly convincing argument.
All you do in your rules is go on about how these aren't actually RL products, how they're much better, and how buying DPRs allows the buyer to use your top secret manufacturing methods and also make much better products. That's all very interesting, especially because the product descriptions you link to are for the RL product. If you're not even going to tell the buyer how what they're buying is better, I don't see the point.
Any decent RPer will also recognize "classified", "top secret", and "advanced" technologies as nothing more than hand-waving. If you actually know why your products are so great, why don't you just post it on the thread? The fact that you'll only reveal your secrets privately and "in due time" is really quite telling.
by Zinaire » Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:07 pm
United Earthlings wrote:I'm sorry no one was kind enough to inform you of all the rules, however some of that is your own fault as in all things you have to take some initiative for yourself. No one told me the rules either when I first started, but I took some of my own initiative and for the first few days read as much as a could and by god after a few poorly done roleplays I was picking them up.
United Earthlings wrote:I actually did inform you or more to the point, point you in the direction you should go to gather more information. In fact I'd rather you had harmed my sales by knowing the rules, then have regret after all this time. The sales aren't that important to me, I'm just glad to hear you've learned the rules and have improved your roleplaying abilities. Maybe in the future we can do a roleplay together?
United Earthlings wrote:True and I have step up quite a bit in helping tons of new players coming into the nationstates world. However, as I said before it's not my job here on nationstates to go around educating every single new person that arrives at the Nationstates Forums on what all the rules and guidelines are. Besides, that's what the stickies are for and if more newbies would take the time to read through them like I did, I wouldn't have to be arguing over the same moot point for the hundredth time.
United Earthlings wrote:I also didn't appreciate having all my hard work being called a scam no matter what your implied intent was, you want to talk about being patronizing and rude, well that makes three of us now. So, welcome to the club my friend!
United Earthlings wrote:The first paragraph I have already addressed, the second one I covered for the most part already too except for the following...
Fine, then they'll recognize it as hand-waving, image their surprise when their preconceived assumptions are shattered. Poor things never even had a chance...
United Earthlings wrote:Some of which makes them unique I actually do post, however if I posted every single thing. I know that eventually it would be copied by a great many deal of people and then I wouldn't exactly be unique anymore now would I. That's why I choose to do it privately, as that's how it's done in the real world or did you miss the part where I stated I try to run UEMS as I would if it was a real life business. Real Life Business don't make everything public, especially if like UEMS their a private company.
Here's a fun exercise for you since you seem incapable of grasping what I'm trying to convey about intellectual property rights and how some things about them are kept "classified", Go Ahead and send an email or letter to the Coca-Cola Company headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia asking them if they could post on the internet or send you their exact formula for how they make their #1 product their known for: Coca-Cola soda. Let me know what their response is. I have a feeling it’s not what your expecting.
by United Earthlings » Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:14 pm
Zinaire wrote:I don't suppose you could find a link to that post, because I really don't remember that happening.
I just went through the stickies and found no mention of DPRs. Furthermore, it may not be your job, but it certainly smacks of profiteering that you don't tell people they already have the DPRs and that you continue to sell them. It also doesn't really make any sense that you can resell them. We all assume that RL companies grant us all DPRs, but I don't see why they would allow you to resell them.
Oh, I figured I joined the club a while ago. Really though, what would you call it if, say, someone came up to you outside the library and said you had to pay a cover charge (no pun intended)?
Your explanation for DC basically amounted to "I change the product in one of any number of possible ways, but it would take too long to actually say what I did." That's not exactly disproving my allegations of hand-waving. If you want constructive criticism, try this: sell fewer products and actually put some time into them.
You don't seem to be grasping that this is NS, and not the real world. On NS, people post information that would be secret in the real world all the time. Luckily, there's the concept of SIC. The player's OOC curiosity about why your products are so great is sated, and, ICly, the country has no actual knowledge. To be perfectly honest, the theft of products and such on here is pretty rare, and when it happens, it's easily dealt with.
This is an OOC thread, so go ahead and tell us what exactly makes your M82 so special.
by Exetonia » Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:49 am
by United Earthlings » Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:03 pm
Exetonia wrote:Would you be willing to use my factbook as a way of looking at my economy. I refuse to subscribe to the idea of a 100% tax rate and have been working on a nation with a fixed population of around 1.5 billion. I'm hoping that my budget isn't way off and that it may entice you to look and god ooh, nice work, yes you may.
Exetonia wrote:On that note, to any naytsayers, I know I can manufacture all these things I wish to purchase myself but, I don't want to pull the resources from other areas of my economy (automobile manufacture, mining etc) to do so. UEMS offers me a way of getting what I need without pulling the manual labour resources from elsewhere!
by Trescott » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:05 pm
by United Earthlings » Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:12 am
Trescott wrote:In response to to your first OOC post, i know it seems a little (if not totally) outrageous to order that many bombers, but having been consumed by a sense of protectiveness (and mild boredom), i couldn't resist the urge to stock up on those naval/airforces that i had been neglecting over the NS years.
For the most part, my nation (as i play it out) is a neutral/peaceful one, so i myself am confused at the fact as to why i'm stocking up on so many weapons. I guess i have a sense of trigger-happiness. Bang. Bang. Bang?
Regarding the order number, i thought this was my seventh purchase and decided to go to town. As the last order i made was tagged as #6. If i am mistaken... you may throw a pie at my face. Yes, a pie. I would preferably like the pie to be pumpkin pie or apple pie. They always have that nice natural ring to them...
Anyways, TG/post me the links, and i'll get on them.
by Merusainia » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:50 pm
by United Earthlings » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:40 am
Merusainia wrote:hello I am the dictator of merusainia and after the last war i have been thinking even though it was minimal damage with only a few tanks bunkers and men but i still think we need a affordable atomatic grenade launcher so i would like to purchase 100 ags-30 graneade launchers and the autherization to reproduce them
please reply
Sinceraly,
Mostal Mart
by Hogusholand » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:29 pm
by United Earthlings » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:54 pm
Hogusholand wrote:OCC You don;t have the german Puma IFV ??
by Archridge » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:35 am
1. PU-239 fission devices of 0.1 kT to 20-kT yields
Use: suitable for lightweight Nuclear Artillery shells and short-range tactical missile warheads
Price: $300 million USD per warhead or multi-warheads up to 20 kT.
by Platinea » Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:56 am
by United Earthlings » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:42 am
Archridge wrote:What size artillery round would be used for 0.1-1kt warheads? also is the price the same on all warheads regardless of size in each class?
Advertisement
Return to Global Economics and Trade
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement