by Finnian Bastada » Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:27 am
by Lanastan » Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:35 pm
by Kremistan » Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:57 pm
by Finnian Bastada » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:13 am
by Maxedon » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:16 pm
HomeLand Safety wrote:Fuck all of you your all a bunch of fucking liberal hippies, you think that the nation should be tolerant of it...well there is a certain point when things should be fucking controlled...Ground Zero is a place where people lost there lives..to a twisted Muslim who wont leave us the fuck alone...they think its a fucking holy war killing innocent civilians...blowing up the nation who is trying to help them...So yes its "One Nation Under God, Not Allah" So fuck you and your damn liberal views...
by Finnian Bastada » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:57 pm
by Finnian Bastada » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:57 pm
by Anemos Major » Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:28 pm
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Finnian Bastada » Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:00 pm
Anemos Major wrote:Who's doing what in which wargame, when and why?
by Slakonian » Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:05 pm
Turmenista wrote:>USA/Obama drops bombs in Syria for over a year, nobody bats an eye or says a word.
>Russia/Putin drops bombs in Syria for a day and-
WE INTERRUPT THIS SHITPOST TO INFORM YOU THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA ARE TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!
by Finnian Bastada » Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:12 pm
by Kremistan » Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:21 pm
by Finnian Bastada » Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:57 pm
Kremistan wrote:Alright. I'm sure they've got some naval power between me and the Straight, so I'm gonna need to clear that up. The problem is, if I just punch one hole in their line, they'll just reform the blockade behind me and cut off my escape route. So, i'm going to need to decimate their navy, and naturally, I can't do that alone. I'm thinking that if we coordinate a large airstrike with sub and air-launched cruise missiles, we can clear ourselves a hole large enough to prevent any flanking maneuvers. And if we gain control of the seas, we can wreck all sorts of havoc with carriers, subs, and naval artillery that we wouldn't be able to do while we continuously were looking over our shoulders, watching for the enemy.
Questions? Comments? Suggestions?
by Kremistan » Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:24 am
by Anemos Major » Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:34 pm
Kremistan wrote:Sounds like a plan. Hopefully, my BrahMos missiles will yield better results in this engagement. I'm still thinking an inundation strike would be best, considering that they all have a fleet of some sort. I think our best bet is to totally overwhelm their defenses, so we probably shouldn't be pulling punches.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Kremistan » Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:29 pm
by Anemos Major » Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:33 pm
Kremistan wrote:Okay. So, unless I'm wrong, anti-fleet operations are as follows, then:
I. Anti-SAM flights
II. Inundation with ASMs
III. Sub cleanup
Follow that up with the hammering of any forces on the ground and a rapid push towards our respective objectives.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Kremistan » Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:06 pm
by Finnian Bastada » Sat Aug 14, 2010 10:23 pm
Anemos Major wrote:
Remember, subs have SAMs.
I'll probably be launching a variety of Wild Weasel raids (i.e. the countermeasure Rafale takes point, backed by Rafales armed with HARMs; SAM fired, CMs dropped, Rafale One goes into evasive action and overflight blows SAM with HARMs). If the enemy is holing themselves up in the strait, however, cruise missiles might work; mind you, they have to be holing themselves up and remaining immobile, otherwise cruise missiles won't have a chance of hitting their ships.
I say we mount low-altitude, long range anti-ship missile strikes, and keep an overwatch group active to take out their submarines when and if their surface to fire SAMs.
As for the landing, massive firepower and beach blitzing sounds about right.
by Anemos Major » Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:02 pm
Finnian Bastada wrote:
What Subs have SAM's? I have never heard of such a vessel. any ways yeah wild weasel style attacks on SAM sites as well as having UAV's Airborne during cruise missile attacks so we can further pinpoint their anti-air sites and destroying their fleet we should also probably work on destroying their air forces as well.
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Finnian Bastada » Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:24 pm
by Anemos Major » Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:04 am
Finnian Bastada wrote:I don't see the point to mounting SAM's on Submarines but the French will do anything for shits and giggles I guess. I figured when the cruise missiles began arriving the SAM's would target those and our UAV's would be able to pin point the AA sites
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr
by Kremistan » Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:14 am
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Arakhkhar, Eusan Federation, The Grand Economic Consortium, Wolfstruppen
Advertisement